No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Report About Peter in I Clement V. 4
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
Extract
The early evidence for the martyrdom of Peter in Rome is extremely exiguous. Perhaps the most important passage is I Clement v. 4. Certainly none other until the end of the second century is equally explicit as to Peter's fate. Therefore it is of some interest that I Clem. v. 4 can itself be completely explained as exegesis of Acts iii-v and xii, especially of v. 17 and xii. 17.
- Type
- Short Studies
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960
References
page 86 note 1 Most recently by Strobel, A., ‘Passa-Symbolik und Passa-Wunder in Act. xii. 3 ff.’, NT.S. IV (1958), 210 ff.Google Scholar The fullest exposition of the parallelism is that by Davis, G. Jr, ‘Was Peter Buried in Rome?,’ J.B.R. xx (1952), 167 ff. This demonstrates the point-by-point correspondence of the story in Acts xii. to the passion story, using elements from John, Matthew and Mark, as well as Luke. (For a number of this article's references to scholarly material I am indebted to Professor A. Nock and Mr D. O'Connor.)Google Scholar
page 87 note 1 
is added by the groups to which Nestle refers as the Hesychian text, the Koine, the Caesarean text, the Old Latin, and other witnesses.
page 87 note 2 Smaltz, W., ‘Did Peter Die in Jerusalem?,’ J.B.L. LXIV (1945), 255 ff.Google Scholar
page 87 note 3 Smaltz, Soloc. cit. and Davis, , loc. cit., also Robinson, D., ‘Where and When Did Peter Die?,’ J.B.L. LXXI (1945), 255 ff.Google Scholar
page 87 note 4 So, especially, Davis, loc. cit.Google Scholar
page 87 note 5 Smaltz, So, loc. cit.Google Scholar