No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
The early evidence for the martyrdom of Peter in Rome is extremely exiguous. Perhaps the most important passage is I Clement v. 4. Certainly none other until the end of the second century is equally explicit as to Peter's fate. Therefore it is of some interest that I Clem. v. 4 can itself be completely explained as exegesis of Acts iii-v and xii, especially of v. 17 and xii. 17.
page 86 note 1 Most recently by Strobel, A., ‘Passa-Symbolik und Passa-Wunder in Act. xii. 3 ff.’, NT.S. IV (1958), 210 ff.Google Scholar The fullest exposition of the parallelism is that by Davis, G. Jr, ‘Was Peter Buried in Rome?,’ J.B.R. xx (1952), 167 ff. This demonstrates the point-by-point correspondence of the story in Acts xii. to the passion story, using elements from John, Matthew and Mark, as well as Luke. (For a number of this article's references to scholarly material I am indebted to Professor A. Nock and Mr D. O'Connor.)Google Scholar
page 87 note 1 
is added by the groups to which Nestle refers as the Hesychian text, the Koine, the Caesarean text, the Old Latin, and other witnesses.
page 87 note 2 Smaltz, W., ‘Did Peter Die in Jerusalem?,’ J.B.L. LXIV (1945), 255 ff.Google Scholar
page 87 note 3 Smaltz, Soloc. cit. and Davis, , loc. cit., also Robinson, D., ‘Where and When Did Peter Die?,’ J.B.L. LXXI (1945), 255 ff.Google Scholar
page 87 note 4 So, especially, Davis, loc. cit.Google Scholar
page 87 note 5 Smaltz, So, loc. cit.Google Scholar