Article contents
Lachmann's Argument
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
Abstract
- Type
- Short Studies
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967
References
page 368 note 1 The Originality of S. Matthew (1951), ch. v, ‘The Lachmann Fallacy’.Google Scholar
page 369 note 1 Moule, C. F. D., The Birth of the New Testament (1962), pp. 223–32.Google Scholar
page 369 note 2 The Synoptic Problem (1964).Google Scholar
page 370 note 1 I am grateful to the librarians of the University Colleges at Bangor and Cardiff for providing a photocopy.
page 372 note 1 Ut adpareat ibid utrumque secutum esse.
page 373 note 1 Passages in quotes are given by Lachmann in the Greek.
page 375 note 1 vel traiecta vel recisa.
page 377 note 1 Abbott, E. A. and Rushbrooke, W. G., The Common Tradition of the Synoptic Gospels (1884), p. viiGoogle Scholar; Farmer, , op. cit. p. 77.Google Scholar
page 377 note 2 Quentin, H., Essais de critique textuelle (1926), ch. III.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by