¹ The New Testament in Greek: The Gospel According to St Luke. Edited by the American and British Committees of The International Greek New Testament Project. Oxford. Part One: Chapters 1–12,1984; Part Two: Chapters 13–24, 1987.Google Scholar

² These include Aland, K., Gnomon 56 (1984) 481–97.Google Scholar and Theologische Revue 80 (1984) 441–8;Google ScholarAmphoux, C., Études Théologiques et Religieuses 86/3, 448–50;Google ScholarKilpatrick, G. D., The Expository Times 95 (1983–1984) 312;CrossRefGoogle ScholarTZ 1987, No. 4;Google ScholarNeirynck, F., ETL 61 (1985) 196–9;Google ScholarO'Callaghan, J., Biblica 65 (1984) 591–3. I am grateful to Dr W. L. Petersen for giving me an advance copy of his review in JBL, and to Kobus Petzer for a typescript of his forthcoming review in the South African journal Neotestamentica.Google ScholarMy own review of Part One (in which I had not been involved) appeared in SJT 39 (1986) 563–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarAmongst the many articles on the Project, the most recent provide a valuable background to the present contribution: Elliott, J. K., ‘The International Project to Establish a Critical Apparatus to Luke's Gospel’, NTS 29 (1983) 531–8;CrossRefGoogle Scholar‘The Purpose and Construction of a Critical Apparatus to a Greek New Testament’, in Schrage, W. (ed.), Studien zum Text und zur Ethik des Neuen Testaments. Festschrift zum 80. Geburtstag von Heinrich Greeven (Berlin, 1986).Google ScholarThe earliest history of the Oxford Critical Greek Testament is partly recorded by a series of articles by von Dobschütz which appeared in ZNW between 1923 and 1926 (Volumes 22–25).Google ScholarFor the transition from this to the International Project, see Kilpatrick, G. D., ‘The Oxford Greek New Testament’, JTS 43 (1942) 30–4;CrossRefGoogle Scholarand Manson's, T. W.Google Scholar review of Legg's Matthew, ibid., 83–92. Articles in NTS on the Project are as follows: Metzger, B. M., ‘Report of Progress of the American Section of the International Greek New Testament Project’, 2 (1955–1956) 222 f.;Google ScholarDuplacy, J., ‘Une tâche importante en difficulté: l'édition du Nouveau Testament Grec’, 14 (1967) 457–68, reprinted in Études de critique textuelle du Nouveau Testament (ed. Delobel, J.; Leuven, 1987) 69–80;Google ScholarRobinson, J. M., ‘International Greek New Testament Project’, 16 (1969–1970) 180–3;Google ScholarElliott, J. K., 29 (1983) 531–8.Google ScholarOther relevant material includes: Colwell, E. C. et al. , ‘The International Greek New Testament Project: a Status Report’, JBL 87 (1968) 187–97;Google ScholarHiggins, A. J. B., ‘The Arabic Diatessaron in the new Oxford Edition of the Gospel According to St Luke in Greek’, JTS 37 (1986) 415–19;CrossRefGoogle ScholarParvis, M. M., ‘The International Project to Establish a New Critical Apparatus of the Greek New Testament’, Crozer Quarterly 27 (1950) 301–8;Google Scholarand Wikgren, A. P. (eds.), New Testament Manuscript Studies. The Materials and the Making of a Critical Apparatus (Chicago, 1950);Google ScholarSuggs, J., ‘Greek Patristic Evidence: The International Project for a New Apparatus’, in La Bible et les Pères, ed. Benoit, A. and Prigent, P. (Paris, 1971) 197–217.Google Scholar

³ For the original decision to use the Textus Receptus, see Manson, , 88 f.Google Scholar

⁴ Hodges, Zane C. and Farstad, Arthur L. (eds.), The Greek New Testament According to the Majority Text (Nashville, 1982, 2nd ed., 1985).Google Scholar