Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T03:01:52.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Floating Words: Their Significance for Textual Criticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

J. M. Ross
J. M. Ross
Affiliation:
64 Wildwood Road, London NW11 6UU, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is often held that where a word or passage is not found in all the manuscripts, but occupies different places in the manuscripts in which it does occur, that is a sign (though not an incontestable proof) that it was not in the original text but has been interpolated.

Type
Short Studies
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 153 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I had previously written about this case in NovT 25 (1983) 62.Google Scholar

2 Cf. Harald Riesenfeld's study reproduced as chap. V of The Gospel Tradition. (Fortress, Philadelphia, 1970).Google Scholar

3 In his article ‘The Silenced Wives of Corinth’, New Testament Textual Criticism (Essays in Honour of Metzger, Bruce M.; ed. Epp, E. J. and Fee, G. D.; Oxford Univ., 1981) 219.Google Scholar