Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:08:15.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eine übersehene Angabe zu den Toledoth Jeschu

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

E. Bamel
E. Bamel
Affiliation:
Cambridge, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Studies
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , July 1989 , pp. 479 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 479 note 1 Über ihn Brockelmann, C., Geschichte der arabischen Literatur 1 (1943) 385Google Scholar, Fritsch, E., Islam und Christentum im Mittelalter (Breslau, 1930) 22Google Scholar (‘die beste apologetische Leistung des Islam’).

page 479 note 2 Zit. Fritsch 70.

page 479 note 3 Strack, H. L., Jesus, die Häretiker und die Christen (Leipzig, 1910) 15.Google Scholar

page 479 note 4 Etwa in der Strassburger Handschrift (Krauss, S., Das Leben Jesu nach jüdischen Quellen [Berlin, 1902] 47).Google Scholar

page 479 note 5 ύπομνματα Rufin: gesta/acta.

page 480 note 1 αύτν (I.11.10) ist die schwierigere Lesart und darum vorzuziehen; näheres bei W. Horbury, ‘A Critical Examination of the Toledoth Jeshu’ (Diss. Cambridge, 1971) 387–95, insbesondere S. 393 f.