Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:09:42.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common Ground with Paganism in Luke and in Josephus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

F. Gerald Downing
F. Gerald Downing
Affiliation:
Manchester, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Papers
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , October 1982 , pp. 546 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

[1] E.g. by Barrett, C. K., in Luke the Historian in recent Study (Philadelphia, 1970), p. 9 in passing, p. 34 apropos of Acts 5. 36Google Scholar; illustrations from other contemporary writers seem to warrant much more space; in Marshall, I. H., Luke: Historian and Theologian, one reference in passing to Josephus' freedom in composing speeches (p. 55), one to Josephus on geography (p. 70).Google ScholarWilson, S. G., The Gentiles and the Gentile Mission (Cambridge, 1973), manages I think to ignore Josephus completely.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[2] See below (nn. 4, 5, 10).

[3] See my ‘Redaction Criticism: Josephus' Antiquities and the Synoptic Gospels’, JSNT 9 (1980), 29–48, part IIGoogle Scholar; and my ‘Ethical Pagan Theism and the Speeches in Acts’, NTS 27 (1980), 544–63.Google Scholar

[4] Haenchen, E., The Acts of the Apostles (Oxford, 1971), pp. 225Google Scholar ff. Other commentators do not even pause to ponder (C. S. C. Williams, F. F. Bruce, Jackson and Lake). See Appended Note.

[5] O'Neill, J. C., The Theology of Acts (London, 1970), p. 145, referring to Eusebius, praep. ev. ix 18, 23, 27.Google Scholar

[6] O'Neill, op. cit., p. 150; Gärtner, B., The Areopagus Speech and Natural Revelation (Uppsala, 1955), passim.Google Scholar

[7] Hans, Conzelmann, ‘The Address of Paul on the Areopagus’, in Keck, L. E. and Martyn, J. L. (eds.), Studies in Luke-Acts, p. 219 and p. 224Google Scholar; cf. Haenchen op. cit., ad loc.

[8] Haenchen, op. cit., p. 529.

[9] Conzelmann, op. cit., pp. 226 f.

[10] Gärtner, op. cit., pp. 23, 29, 68, etc.

[11] Apion II 130, 262–8, 172; cf. J.W.I 425, II 358, Ant. IV 84, XIV 149 ff.; Apion I 21.

[12] Seen. 3 above.

[13] See, again, my ‘Ethical Pagan Theism’, NTS 27 (1980), 544–63 and n. 10, on entertainment in contemporary history-writing.Google Scholar

[14] Art. cit. Appended Note – I find another prayer very like those in Acts and in Josephus, in Philo, In Flaccum 120–125, containing all but the third item, though presenting a rather different order. The treatise is clearly intended for a non-Jewish readership: ‘O Lord (despota) …mighty king of mortals and immortals…’