Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T23:25:31.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Babylonian Talmud on the Execution of Jesus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Raymond E. Brown
Raymond E. Brown
Affiliation:
Emeritus, Union Theological Seminary; 320 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In my The Death of the Messiah, preparatory to examining the Gospel accounts of the trial/interrogation of Jesus by the chief priest(s) and San-hedrin, I surveyed the extra-Gospel evidence for authoritative Jewish involvement in the death of Jesus, derived from Jewish, Christian, and pagan sources. From the Jewish evidence I discussed two items: the witness of Josephus (Ant. 18.3.3; #63–t) and a baraita from TalBab Sanhedrin 43a which I quoted from the London Soncino translation (Nezikin volume 3.281):

On the eve of Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, ‘He is going forth to be stoned because he has practised sorcery and enticed Israel to apostacy. Anyone who can say anything in his favour, let him come forward and plead on his behalf.’ But since nothing was brought forward in his favour he was hanged on the eve of Passover.

Type
Short Studies
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 158 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 (New York: Doubleday, 1994) 1.372–81, esp. 376–8.

2 He cites J. Z. Lauterbach's dating of it to the 5th or 6th century, and comments ‘I am not sure that this late date need be maintained.’

3 Indeed, in the next paragraph (1.377) I began a quest to see if there was any other evidence (reflected by Celsus or Justin) that would be earlier than ‘that approximate date’.

4 Nor, may I add parenthetically, did I neglect the question of whether Yeshu was Jesus of Nazareth (rather than Joshua b. Perahiah), for I pointed to the defence of the Jesus identification by O. Betz.

5 Silberman seems to question this because in the Gospel narratives there is no announcement of execution made forty days before the event. But in John (11.45–53) a Sanhedrin decided to put Jesus to death weeks before he died on Passover eve.