Article contents
The Alleged Matthaean Errata
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
Abstract
- Type
- Short Studies
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963
References
page 391 note 1 S. Vernon MacCasland, J.B.L. (June 1961), pp. 143-8.
page 391 note 2 I Kings xxiii. 31.
page 391 note 3 II Kings xxv. 27–30.
page 391 note 4 Ahaziah, II Kings viii. 25–x. 28; Joash, II Kings xi. 12–20; Amaziah, II Kings xiv. 1–20.
page 391 note 5 Life, par. 1.
page 391 note 6 Dan. v. 11, 18. R. P. Gougherty, Nabonidus and Belshazzar (1929).
page 392 note 1 Chamberlain, V.T. (1955), pp. 366–72.Google Scholar
page 393 note 1 Grimm-Thayer, , Greek-English Lexicon of the N. T. (Edinburgh, 1888), p. 422.Google Scholar
page 393 note 2 Gen. xii. 10 and xlvi. 6.
page 393 note 3 II Kings xxv. 26.
page 393 note 4 But packs everything into Thursday night and Friday morning.
page 393 note 5 Jaubert, La date de la Cène (Paris, 1957), Tableau de Concordance at the end.
page 394 note 1 Mark v. 17; x. 46–52; xi. 1–10.
page 394 note 2 Narborough in A New Commentary of Holy Scripture (S.P.C.K. 1928), N.T.p. 39.Google Scholar
page 394 note 3 Papias in Eus. H.P. iii. 39.
page 394 note 4 Butler, The Originality of St Matthew (Cambridge, 1951), p. 12, and two articles on the Didache: J.T.S. xi (1960), 265–83, and xii (1961), 38.Google Scholar
page 394 note 5 Carr, Gospel According to St Matthew (Cambridge, 1913), p. xvii.Google Scholar
page 394 note 6 Augustine, De cons. ev. 11.
- 2
- Cited by