^{Page 50 note 1} See Kundsin, Topologische Ueberlieferungsstoffe im Johannes Evangelium.

^{Page 51 note 1} See Manson's, T. W. article in The Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, May 1947.Google Scholar

^{Page 51 note 2} R. Bultmann rearranges the order of John as follows: iv. 43–54, vi. 1–59, V. 1–47. Das Evangelium des Johannes, pp. 148f.

^{Page 52 note 1} Schmidt, K. L. throws a little doubt upon this natural inference, Der Rahmen der Geschichle jesu, p. 191.Google Scholar

^{Page 53 note 1} It is possible the ἤθελον οὖν λαβεἴν (John vi. 21) is a reminiscence ofἤθελον οὖν παρελθεīν α⋯ὐτο⋯ὐσ (Mark vi. 28).

^{Page 55 note 1} Cf. Barrett, , op. cit. p. 255, ‘One of the main and most characteristic Marcan themes reappears in these verses, that of concealment and revelation.’ See V. Taylor, The Gospel according to St Mark, pp. 122 ff.Google Scholar

^{Page 55 note 2} Here John follows Luke vii. 38 rather than Mark xiv. 3.

^{Page 56 note 1} There is no distinction between and in the LXX version of Psalm xxii (xxi). 19.

^{Page 56 note 2} In the New Testament the word σπόγγος is used only in this context and it is likely that Matthew and John took it from Mark xv. 36.