Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:39:40.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘The Lachmann Fallacy’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

W. R. Farmer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Studies
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , April 1968 , pp. 441 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dazu Westermann, a. a. O. S. 284 f., 298 u.ö

2 Finales ‘bis’ liegt auch vor in Hiob xiv. 14 ‘alle meine Dienstzeit wollte ich harren, bis daB (IS?) meine Ablosung kame’ und Ps. cxxiii. 2 ‘...so sehen unsre Augen auf den Herrn, unsern Gott, bis (7$) er sich unser erbarmt’

3 ‘Lachmann's Argument’, N.T.S. XIII, no. 4 (July 1967), 368–78.

1 The Originality of Matthew(1951), p. 63.

2 Cp. pp. 36 ff.

3 ‘A “Skeleton in the Closet” of Gospel Research’, Biblical Research, VI (1961), 23–6.

4 William, Wrede, Das Messiasgeheimnis in den Evangelien(1901), pp. 148–9.Google Scholar Cp. Farmer, William R., ‘The Two Document Hypothesis as a Methodological Criterion in Synoptic Research’, A.T.R. xlviii (October 1966), 380–96. See especially pp. 387–9 and the note on Werner George Kümmel's Introduction to the New Testament (1966).Google Scholar