Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:23:50.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
New Surveys in the Classics , Volume 34: Roman Art , 2004 , pp. 1 - 4
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On Rome’s growth see e.g. Crawford (1992); on some of the cultural implications note e.g. Gruen (1992).

2 For increasing familiarity see Pollitt (1978). See also Toynbee (1951) on Greek artists in the Roman context.

3 Virgil, Aeneid 6.847–53 (c.26–19 BC). Cf. Horace, Epistles 2.1.156: ‘Captive Greece took captive her savage conqueror, and brought the arts to rustic Latium . . .’ (c. 12 BC).

4 Toynbee (1951).

5 An essential discussion of the problem of Roman art is to be found in Brendel (1979); see his p. 6 for the comparison with Greek and Egyptian art.

6 Note Beard and Henderson (2001), dealing with Graeco-Roman art and our relationship with it.

7 For gems and other ‘minor’ and luxury arts see Henig (1983b). On gems see also Zazoff (1983); Henig (1994), x–xii.

8 On some Romano-British and other provincial art see Chapter Three.