Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:24:28.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Get access

Extract

‘It has rightly been felt that in the words of Tacitus the authentic voice of ancient Rome is heard for the last time.’ So E. Fraenkel wrote in 1932, and nothing we have learned since about the literature and thought of later antiquity detracts at all from the truth of his words. The age of Trajan marks not the beginning, but the end of an epoch. Then, as scarcely thereafter, specifically Roman ideas of dignitas, grauitas, and uirtus, and that specifically Roman sense of continuity and tradition, still counted for much and conditioned both actions and attitudes. Tacitus speaks both for his own time and for the past.

The central conflict between Tacitus’ claim to write dispassionately and the manner in which he does in fact write can never be reconciled or removed. It is no less real because it partly arises from our acceptance of standards of historical accuracy quite unfamiliar to Tacitus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page no 43 note 1 Neue Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Jugendbildung viii (1932), 218 = Kleine Beiträge 2. 309.

page no 43 note 2 See Pöschl, V., ‘Der Historiker Tacitus’, Die Welt ah Geschichte xxii (1962), 110 Google Scholar = Tacitus (Wege der Forschung xcvii, Darmstadt, 1969), 161-76.