Equilibrium and kinetic isotope fractionations during incomplete reactions
result in minute differences in the
ratio between the two stable N isotopes, 15N and
14N, in various N pools. In ecosystems such variations (usually
expressed in per mil [δ15N] deviations from
the
standard atmospheric N2) depend on isotopic signatures of inputs
and outputs, the input–output balance, N transformations and
their specific isotope effects, and compartmentation
of N within the system. Products along a sequence of reactions, e.g. the
N mineralization–N uptake pathway,
should, if fractionation factors were equal for the different reactions,
become progressively depleted. However,
fractionation factors vary. For example, because nitrification discriminates
against
15N in the substrate more than
does N mineralization, NH4+
can become isotopically heavier than the organic N from which it is derived.
Levels of isotopic enrichment depend dynamically on the stoichiometry
of
reactions, as well as on specific abiotic
and biotic conditions. Thus, the δ15N of a specific N
pool is not a constant, and δ15N of a N compound added
to
the system is not a conservative, unchanging tracer. This fact, together
with
analytical problems of measuring δ15N
in small and dynamic pools of N in the soil–plant system, and the
complexity of the N cycle itself (for instance
the abundance of reversible reactions), limit the possibilities of making
inferences based on observations of 15N
abundance in one or a few pools of N in a system. Nevertheless, measurements
of δ15N might offer the advantage
of giving insights into the N cycle without disturbing the system by adding
15N tracer.
Such attempts require, however, that the complex factors affecting
δ15N in plants be taken into account, viz. (i)
the source(s) of N (soil, precipitation, NOx, NH3,
N2-fixation), (ii) the depth(s) in soil from which N is taken
up,
(iii) the form(s) of soil-N used (organic N, NH4+,
NO3−), (iv) influences of mycorrhizal symbioses
and
fractionations during and after N uptake by plants, and (v) interactions
between these factors and plant phenology.
Because of this complexity, data on δ15N can only be
used alone when certain requirements are met, e.g. when a
clearly discrete N source in terms of amount and isotopic signature is
studied.
For example, it is recommended
that N in non-N2-fixing species should differ more than
5‰ from N derived by N2-fixation, and that several
non-N2-fixing references are used, when data on δ15N
are used to estimate N2-fixation in poorly described ecosystems.
As well as giving information on N source effects, δ15N
can
give insights into N cycle rates. For example, high
levels of N deposition onto previously N-limited systems leads to increased
nitrification, which produces
15N-enriched NH4+ and
15N-depleted NO3−. As many forest
plants
prefer NH4+ they become enriched in 15N
in such
circumstances. This change in plant δ15N will subsequently
also
occur in the soil surface horizon after litter-fall,
and might be a useful indicator of N saturation, especially since there
is
usually an increase in δ15N with depth
in soils of N-limited forests.
Generally, interpretation of
15N measurements requires additional independent data and modelling,
and
benefits from a controlled experimental setting. Modelling will be greatly
assisted by the development of methods
to measure the δ15N of small dynamic pools of N in soils.
Direct
comparisons with parallel low tracer level 15N
studies will be necessary to further develop the interpretation of variations
in δ15N in soil–plant systems. Another
promising approach is to study ratios of
15N[ratio ]14N together with other pairs of stable
isotopes, e.g.
13C[ratio ]12C or 18O[ratio ]16O,
in the same ion or molecules. This approach can help to tackle the
challenge of distinguishing isotopic
source effects from fractionations within the system studied.