Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:12:53.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responses to ozone in 12 provenances of European beech (Fagus sylvatica): genotypic variation and chamber effects on photosynthesis and dry-matter partitioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1999

G. PALUDAN-MÜLLER
Affiliation:
The Royal Veterinary & Agricultural University, Department of Economics and Natural Resources, Arboretum, Kirkegårdsvej 3A, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark
H. SAXE
Affiliation:
The Royal Veterinary & Agricultural University, Department of Economics and Natural Resources, Arboretum, Kirkegårdsvej 3A, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark
J. W. LEVERENZ
Affiliation:
The Royal Veterinary & Agricultural University, Department of Economics and Natural Resources, Arboretum, Kirkegårdsvej 3A, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

Seedlings of 12 provenances of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) were exposed to ambient, non-filtered air (NF) or NF+50 nl l−1 ozone (NF50) for 8 h d−1 in open-top chambers (OTCs), from 1 June to 4 October 1995. In 1996 exposure was continued from 31 May to 1 October at four levels: charcoal-filtered air (CF), NF, NF50 and NF+100 nl l−1 ozone (NF100). Provenances were grown for both seasons in outside reference plots. All treatments were replicated. Ozone did not affect gas exchange in the provenances until late in the second season. NF100 reduced photosynthesis by 18% in August 1996 compared to CF. In September, photosynthesis was reduced by 22% in NF50 and by 29% in NF100. After two seasons, ozone reduced the root:shoot ratio by 24% when comparing CF and NF100; this was caused by reductions in the root biomass. Ozone did not affect height growth or stem diameter, and there were no ozone×provenance interactions for any growth parameter. There was, however, a significant ozone×provenance interaction for photosynthesis, showing northwest European provenances to be more sensitive to ozone than southeast European provenances when comparing dose–response estimates. This is interpreted in terms of genetic adaptation of the photosynthetic apparatus to regional growing conditions. Seedlings in the chambers grew 45% taller, and had 28% more shoot biomass and 29% smaller root biomass, resulting in a 44% reduction of root:shoot ratios compared to seedlings outside. Increased temperature and decreased PAR inside the chambers relative to the outside were probably the main causes for the differences. The magnitude of the chamber effects in OTCs raises doubts about conclusions drawn from ozone exposures in such chambers. This and previous ozone experiments with OTCs may have reached inaccurate conclusions concerning the size of ozone responses due to chamber effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Trustees of the New Phytologist 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)