Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:02:41.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of geminivirus infection and growth irradiance on the vegetative growth and photosynthetic production of Eupatorium makinoi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

S. FUNAYAMA
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–8572, Japan Present address: Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Machikaneyama-cho 1-16, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan (fax +81 6 6850 5808; e-mail [email protected]).
I. TERASHIMA
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–8572, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Eupatorium makinoi plants with or without geminivirus infection were grown in shading frames with 70, 15 and 5.5% sunlight. Growth characteristics of these plants in the early vegetative phase were compared by means of growth analysis. We also measured leaf photosynthetic gas exchange rates and examined relationships between leaf photosynthesis and whole-plant growth. Relative growth rate (RGR=(1/W)×(dW/dt), where W is plant dry mass) of virus-infected plants was lower than that of uninfected plants under all three light conditions. The reduction of RGR by infection was increased with irradiance. The net assimilation rate (NAR=(1/A)×(dW/dt), where A is total leaf area of the plant) was also reduced both by infection and shading. NARs that were estimated from light-response curves of leaf photosynthesis, in situ measurements of irradiance, and respiration rates of leaves, stems and below-ground parts, agreed very well with the values obtained by conventional growth analysis techniques. Decreases in the estimated NAR value from infection and shading were mostly explained by the decreases in leaf photosynthesis. These results clearly showed that lowered RGR in virus-infected plants was attributed mainly to impaired photosynthesis in virus-infected leaves.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Trustees of the New Phytologist 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)