Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:46:58.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of leaf water content on the C3–CAM transition in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1997

WERNER B. HERPPICH
Affiliation:
Institut für Ökologie der Pflanzen, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, D-48143 Münster, Germany
MARGARETHA HERPPICH
Affiliation:
Institut für Ökologie der Pflanzen, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, D-48143 Münster, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Changes in leaf water content, night-time accumulation of malic (Δ-malate) and citric acid (Δ-citrate) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC, EC 4 . 1 . 1 . 31) activity were followed for 60 d after germination in well watered and salt-stressed plants of the facultatively halophytic ephemeral Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. To separate the effects of development, salt stress and water deficit on crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) induction plants were stressed initially 10 d after germination and then successively at 1-wk intervals (five sets). Related to dry mass or organic matter (i.e. dry mass corrected for the mass of inorganic ions) water content started to decrease during the late embryonal phase of the life cycle. Water content on a dry mass basis was always lower in salt-stressed than in well watered individuals. However, on an organic matter basis no difference was detectable. This indicated that salt treatment did not reduce leaf water content but falsified the basis (dry mass). Increases in leaf succulence and in pressure potential prevented long-term water deficit in well watered and in salt-stressed plants. Instead, these changes displayed enhanced vacuolisation, which is an essential prerequisite for the development of CAM. The end of that differentiation process might allow the initiation of nocturnal malic acid accumulation in a threshold response. At the onset of each salt treatment, short-term water deficits occurred due to an incomplete osmotic adaptation independent of plant age. As Δ-malate only appeared when plants were c. 35 d old this water deficit was unlikely to be a decisive CAM-inducing factor. About 2 wk after germination water content began to decline during the light periods in plants of all treatments. This pattern disappeared again when CAM had been fully established. Daytime transpirational water loss is therefore unlikely to be the decisive factor because it failed to induce the metabolic shift in young plants. Environmental stress (e.g. salt or drought) can therefore only induce Δ-malate when leaf and plant differentiation has reached a certain stage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Trustees of the New Phytologist 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)