Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:15:54.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turkey's experience with neoliberal policies since 1980 in retrospect and prospect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Fikret Şenses
Fikret Şenses*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Middle East Technical University, 06531 Ankara, Turkey, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper provides a critical assessment of Turkey's economic performance under the neoliberal economic policies which have been instrumental in generating a profound transformation in its socioeconomic structure since 1980. The paper draws special attention to the government's loss of policy autonomy and the democratic deficit at the initial and implementation stages of this transformation. It then evaluates Turkey's economic performance on the basis of indicators with medium and long-term impacts, such as investment, saving, industrialization, unemployment, and income distribution. This assessment shows that the neoliberal model has failed to fulfill its promises, with the Turkish economy failing to achieve performance equal to that under the previous import-substitution strategy or in comparable countries. The paper then identifies the main problem areas confronting the economy: the current account deficit, the labor market, insufficient industrial progress and income distribution, and poverty. To solve these problems, it calls for both a radical rethinking of the neoliberal policy regime and for proactive state intervention to stimulate saving and investment as part of a new development strategy, giving primary importance to industrialization, employment creation, and more equitable income distribution.

Keywords

Neoliberalismdemocracypoverty and income distributionindustrialization strategyrole of the statenew international economic order
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 47: Special Issue on Turkey's Experience with Neoliberal Policies and Globalization , Fall 2012 , pp. 11 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akçoraoğlu, Alparslan. “Employment, Economic Growth and Labor Market Performance: The Case of Turkey.” Ekonomik Yaklaşım 21, no. 77 (2010): 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydın, Zülküf. “Neo-Liberal Transformation of Turkish Agriculture.” Journal of Agrarian Change 10, no. 2 (2010): 149–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boratav, Korkut. “On İkı Yıllık Bir Bölüşüm Bilançosu.” (2011), http://haber.sol.org.tr/yazarlar/korkut-boratav/on-iki-yillik-bir-bolusum-bilancosu-40202.Google Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon. “Kicking Away the Ladder: Infant Industry Promotion in Historical Perspective.” Oxford Development Studies 31, no. 1 (2003): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebiri, Kutlay. “Turkish Apertura, Part I.” METU Studies in Development 7, no. 3–4 (1980): 209–253.Google Scholar
The Economist, March 27, 2011.Google Scholar
Fischer, Stanley. “Issues in Medium-Term Macro Economic Adjustment.” World Bank Research Observer 1, no. 2 (1986): 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyn, Andrew. Explaining Labor’s Declining Share of National Income, C–24 Policy Brief No. 4, http://www.g24.org/PDF/pbn04.pdf.Google Scholar
Seyfettin, Gürsel and Dinçer, Mehmet Alper. İşsizlik Artmaya Devam Edecek, BETAM Araştırma Notu No.32. İstanbul: Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, 2009.Google Scholar
Littlelan, M.D. lan, M.D.Tibor, Scitovsky and Scott, Maurice F.Industry and Trade in Some Developing Countries: A Comparative Study. London: Published for the Development Centre of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development by Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Ronald I.“The International Capital Market and Economic Liberalization in LDCs.” The Developing Economies 22, no. 4 (1984): 476–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutlu, Servet. “The Economic Cost of Civil Conflict in Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 47, no. 1 (2011): 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onaran, Özlem. “Türkiye’de İhracat Yönelimli Büyüme Politikalarının istihdam Üzerindeki Etkileri.” In İktisat Üzerine Yazılar II: İktisadi Kalkınma, Kriz ve İstikrar - Oktar Turel’e Armağan, edited by Köse, Ahmet H.Şenses, Fikret and Yeldan, Erinç, 579–601. İstanbul: İletişim, 2003.Google Scholar
Öniş, Ziya. “Power, Interests and Coalitions: The Political Economy of Mass Privatisation in Turkey.” Third World Quarterly 32, no. 4 (2011): 707–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öniş, Ziya and Şenses, Fikret. “Global Dynamics, Domestic Coalitions and a Reactive State: Major Policy Shifts in Post-War Turkish Economic Development.” METU Studies in Development 34, no. 2 (2007): 251–286.Google Scholar
Öniş, Ziya and Şenses, Fikret. “Rethinking the Emerging Post-Washington Consensus: A Critical Appraisal.” Development and Change 36, no. 2 (2005): 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özmucur, Süleyman. “Yeni Milli Gelir Serisi ve Gelirin Fonksiyonel Dağılımı, 1968–1994.” METU Studies in Development 23, no. 1 (1996).Google Scholar
Pamuk, Şevket. “Economic Growth and Institutional Change in Turkey before 1980.” In Understanding the Process of Economic Change in Turkey, edited by Tamer, Çetin and Yılmaz, Feridun3–19. New York: Nova Publishers, 2010.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey. “Trade and Exchange Rate Policies in Growth Oriented Adjustment Programs.” In Growth Oriented Adjustment Programs, edited by Corbo, Vittorio, Goldstein, Morris and Khan, Mohsin, 291–325. Washington DC: IMF and World Bank, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanayi ve Ticaret Bakanlığı. Türkiye Sanayi Stratejisi Belgesi 2011–2014. Ankara: Sanayi ve Ticaret Bakanlığı, 2010, http://www.sanayi.gov.tr/Files/Documents/sanayi_stratejis_belgesi_2011_2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Shafaaddin, Mehdi. “Towards an Alternative Perspective on Trade and Industrial Policies.” Development and Change 36, no. 6 (2005).Google Scholar
The State of Food Insecurity in the World: How Does International Price Volatility Affect Domestic Economies and Food Security? Rome: IFAD, WFP, FAO, 2011, http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i233oe/i2381eoo.pdf.Google Scholar
Şahinkaya, Serdar. “Türkiye Sanayi Strateji Belgesi (2011–2014) Üzerine Gözlemler.” http://www.mulkiye.org.tr/filesandimages/file/Sahinkaya.sanayi%obelgesi.pdf.Google Scholar
Şenses, Fikret. “Short-term Stabilization Policies in a Developing Economy: The Turkish Experience in 1980 in Long-Term Perspective.” METU Studies in Development 8, no. 1–2 (1981): 409–452.Google Scholar
“Trade Union Density.” OECD.StatExtracts (2012), http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=UN_DEN.Google Scholar
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜÍK), http://www.tuik.gov.tr.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2011. New York: UNDP, 2011.Google Scholar
World Bank. World Development Indicators, [various issues], Washington D.C.: World Bank, 2010–2011.Google Scholar
World Bank. World Development Report 2011. Washington DC: World Bank, 2011.Google Scholar
Yentürk, Nurhan and Başlevent, Cem. Türkiye’de Genç İşsizliği, Gençlik Çalışmaları Birimi Araştırma Raporu No.2. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Gençlik Çalışmaları Birimi, 2007, http://www.setav.org/ups/dosya/10409.pdf.Google Scholar