Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:16:18.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transforming state–civil society relations: centralization and externalization in refugee education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2020

Maissam Nimer Open the ORCID record for Maissam Nimer [Opens in a new window]
Maissam Nimer*
Affiliation:
Istanbul Policy Center, Sabancı University, Istanbul, Turkey; Migration Research Center, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey. Address: Bankalar Cad. No: 2 Minerva Han 34420 Karaköy, İstanbulTurkey. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the context of the arrival of Syrians as of 2011 and the subsequent humanitarian assistance received in light of the EU–Turkey deal in 2016, there has been increased control over civil society organizations (CSOs) in Turkey. Through the case study of language education, this paper examines the relationship between the state and CSOs as shaped by the presence of Syrian refugees and how it evolved through the autonomy of state bureaucracy. It demonstrates that increased control led to the proliferation of larger projects, the deterrence of smaller CSOs, and a hierarchy between organizations prioritizing those that are aligned with the state. It argues that this policy is not only the result of the increased lack of trust between state and civil society but also an attempt to channel funds through state institutions to handle an unprecedented number of refugees while externalizing some of its functions. At the same time, this emerging relationship effectively allows the state to avoid making long-term integration policies and facing growing tensions among the public. This study is based on a qualitative study encompassing interviews with state officials as well as stakeholders in different types of CSOs that deliver language education for adults.

Keywords

migrationrefugeescivil society organizationsstatelanguage educationSyriansTurkeystate institutionsbureaucracy
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 63 , November 2020 , pp. 32 - 54
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Author’s note: I wish to thank Didem Danış, Umut Türem, and Volkan Yılmaz, for their invaluable comments on earlier versions of this paper. I am also grateful to the very initial comments of members of AYAK group. I also wish to thank Tuygun Oruç for contributing to the fieldwork and sharing her ideas and enthusiasm in the process. The names of concerned individuals and institutions are not divulged to preserve the confidentiality, maintain trust, and preserve the integrity of this paper.

References

Adamson, Fiona B. and Tsourapas, Gerasimos. “The Migration State in the Global South: Nationalizing, Developmental, and Neoliberal Models of Migration Management.” International Migration Review (October 24, 2019). http://doi:10.1177/0197918319879057.Google Scholar
Adepoju, Aderanti, Van Noorloos, Femke, and Zoomers, Annelies. “Europe’s Migration Agreements with Migrant-Sending Countries in the Global South: A Critical Review: Europe’s Migration Agreements.” International Migration 48, no. 3 (2009): 42–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altenried, Moritz, Bojadžijev, Manuela, Höer, Leif, Mezzadra, Sandro, and Wallis, Mira. “Logistical Borderscapes: Politics and Mediation of Mobile Labor in Germany after the ‘Summer of Migration’.” South Atlantic Quarterly 117, no. 2. (2018): 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydin-Duzgit, Senem, Keyman, E. Fuat, and Biehl, K.S.. “Changing Parameters of Migration Cooperation: Beyond the EU–Turkey Deal?” IPC Report. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center, December 2019.Google Scholar
Bee, Cristiano, and Kaya, Ayhan. “Youth and Active Citizenship in Turkey: Engagement, Participation and Emancipation.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 17, no. 1 (2017): 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Andrea. “The Shape and Sustainability of Turkey’s Booming Humanitarian Assistance.” Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement 5, no. 2 (2014). http://doi:10.4000/poldev.1741.Google Scholar
Bode, Ingo. “Disorganized Welfare Mixes: Voluntary Agencies and New Governance Regimes in Western Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 16, no. 4 (2006): 346–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy. “Coding in Grounded Theory Practice.” In Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis, edited by Charmaz, Kathy, 42–71. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage, 2006.Google Scholar
Danış, Didem, and Nazlı, Dilara. “A Faithful Alliance between the Civil Society and the State: Actors and Mechanisms of Accommodating Syrian Refugees in Istanbul.” International Migration (August 24, 2018). http://doi:10.1111/imig.12495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirdjian, Lala. “Introduction: Education, Refugees and Asylum Seekers: A Global Overview.” In Education, Refugees and Asylum Seekers, edited by Demirdjian, Lala, 1–33. New York: Continuum, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirdjian, Lala. “The Provision of Education in the Palestinian Refugee Camps, in Lebanon.” In Education, Refugees and Asylum Seekers, edited by Demirdjian, Lala, 105–26. New York: Continuum, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Jessica Leigh. “State Control of Civil Society Organizations: The Case of Turkey.” Democratization 24, no. 2 (2017): 244–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Timothy M. “The Venezuelan Government and the Global Field: The Legislative Battle over Foreign Funding for Nongovernmental Organizations.” Sociological Forum 31, no. 1 (2016): 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyden, Goran. No Shortcuts to Progress: African Development Management in Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Inalcık, H. “Tarihsel Baglamda Sivil Toplum ve Tarikatlar.” In Küreselleşme Sivil Toplum ve İslam, edited by Sarıbay, A.Y. and Keyman, E.F., 74–87. Istanbul: Vadi Yayınları, 1998.Google Scholar
Kagan, Michael. “‘The UN “Surrogate State” and the Foundation of Refugee Policy in the M’ by Michael Kagan.” Scholarly Works, 2012. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/781/.Google Scholar
Kalaycıoglu, E. “Sivil Toplum ve Neopatrimonyal Siyaset.” In Küreselleşme Sivil Toplum ve İslam, edited by Sarıbay, A.Y. and Keyman, E.F., 74–87. Istanbul: Vadi Yayınları, 1998.Google Scholar
Keane, John. “Introduction.” In Civil Society and the State: New European Perspectives, edited by Keane, John, 1–32. London; New York: Verso Books, 1988.Google Scholar
Kubicek, Paul. “The Earthquake, Civil Society, and Political Change in Turkey: Assessment and Comparison with Eastern Europe.” Political Studies 50, no. 4 (2002): 761–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccarthy, Aslıhan. “Chapter 12 State–Civil Society Relations in Education Provision for Syrian Refugees in Turkey.” In Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, edited by Sengupta, Enakshi, Blessinger, Patrick, and International Higher Education Teaching and Learning Association, 13: 175–88. Melbourne: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2018.Google Scholar
Mencütek, Zeynep Şahin. Refugee Governance, State and Politics in the Middle East. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migdal, Joel S. State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohan, Giles. “The Disappointments of Civil Society: The Politics of NGO Intervention in Northern Ghana.” Political Geography 21 (2002): 125–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, Christine. “Changing the Prism: New Theoretical Approaches for Education in Emergencies.” In The Contested Role of Education in Conflict and Fragility, edited by Gross, Zehavit and Davies, Lynn, 63–81. The World Council of Comparative Education Societies. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oktem, Kerem. “Turkey’s New Diaspora Policy: The Challenge of Inclusivity, Outreach and Capacity.” IPC-Mercator Policy Brief. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center, August 2014.Google Scholar
Oszlak, Oscar. “Critical Approaches to the Study of State Bureaucracy: A Latin American Perspective.” International Social Science Journal 31, no. 4 (1979): 661–81.Google Scholar
Rottmann, Susan Beth. “Integration in Turkey – Country Report.” RESPOND – Multilevel Governance of Mass Migration in Europe and Beyond Project (#770564, Horizon2020) Working Paper Series, 2020.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunata, Ulaş, and Tosun, Salih. “Assessing the Civil Society’s Role in Refugee Integration in Turkey: NGO-R as a New Typology.” Journal of Refugee Studies (September 17, 2018). http://doi:10.1093/jrs/fey047.Google Scholar
Wiktorowicz, Quintan. “Civil Society as Social Control: State Power in Jordan.” Comparative Politics 33, no. 1 (2000): 43. http://doi:10.2307/422423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Volkan. “The Emerging Welfare Mix for Syrian Refugees in Turkey: The Interplay between Humanitarian Assistance Programmes and the Turkish Welfare System.” Journal of Social Policy (December 18, 2018): 1–19. http://doi:10.1017/S0047279418000806.Google Scholar
Youngs, Richard, and Kucukkeles, Mujge. “New Directions for European Assistance in Turkey.” IPC Report. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center, March 2017. http://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/New-Directions-for-European-Assistance-in-Turkey_Richard-Youngs_Mujge-Kucukkeles.pdf.Google Scholar