Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:22:57.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Timing of Capital Account Liberalization: The Turkish Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Hasan Ersel
Hasan Ersel*
Affiliation:
Yapı ve Kredi Bank, Istanbul, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Liberalization programs are aimed at the removal of the restrictions placed upon the working of the market mechanism. These restrictions may be broadly classified under two categories. The first category of restrictions is aimed at the control of domestic markets, particularly financial markets. The underlying idea behind liberalization programs is that the removal of such restrictions will have a positive impact on the efficiency of domestic markets. The second group of restrictions are of an indirect nature and are aimed at the protection of the domestic economy from the effects of developments in international markets. Liberalization programs advocate the removal of the restrictions that prevent the integration of these markets. The removal of these restrictions is expected to increase competition, and enhance efficiency in resource allocation.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 15 , Fall 1996 , pp. 45 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altınkemer, M. and Ekinci, N.. 1992. “Capital Account Liberalization: The Case of Turkey,” New Perspectives on Turkey, Fall, pp. 89–108.Google Scholar
Atiyas, I and Ersel, H.. 1994. “The Impact of Financial Reform: The Turkish Experience,” in Caprio, G. Jr., Atiyas, I. & Hanson, J.A. (Eds.) Financial Reform: Theory and Experience, Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–139.Google Scholar
Kruger, A.O. 1984. Problems of Liberalization, in Harberger, A. (Ed.) World Economic Growth. San Fransisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, R.I. 1973. Money and Capital in Economic Development. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
O'Connell, S.A. and Zeldes, S. P.. 1986. Rational Ponzi Games. White, Rodney L. Center for Financial Research Discussion Paper No. 1886, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Özatay, F. 1996. “The Lessons from the 1994 Crisis in Turkey: Public Debt (Mis)management and Confidence Crisis,” Yapı Kredi Economic Review, Vol. 7, No.1, June, pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
Özatay, F. 1994. The Sustainability of Public Sector Deficits: The Case of Turkey. CBRT Research Department Discussion paper, No. 9402, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Ankara.Google Scholar
Tirole, J. 1982. “On the Possibility of Speculation Under Rational Expectations,” Econometrica, 50, No. 5, September, pp. 1163–1182.Google Scholar
Togan, S. 1994. Foreign Trade Regime and Trade Liberalization in Turkey During the 1980s Avebury: Aldershot.Google Scholar
Uygur, E. 1994. Financial Liberalization and Economic Performance in Turkey. Ankara: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Publication.Google Scholar