Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:11:23.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theses on the “National Truth”: Border Crossings between History Writing and Historical Fiction in Attilâ İlhan's Gâzi Paşa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Erol Köroğlu*
Affiliation:
Department of Turkish Language and Literature, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey, [email protected]

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to read Attilâ İlhan's novel Gâzi Paşa, a historical novel about the Turkish Independence War, with a focus on the distinction between history writing and historical novel. I begin my analysis of this novel from the narratological perspective developed by Dorrit Cohn, who emphasizes two aspects of this distinction: different reference fields of history and fiction, and fiction's distinctive ability in reaching into the minds of characters. These aspects will help me to unravel the production of meaning in Gâzi Paşa through its ambivalent and intentional border crossings between the two fields. Then, I will explain this intentional textual swing through an analysis of its roman à thèse features, which I ground on Susan Rubin Suleiman's description of the genre. Finally, the essay will discuss Gâzi Paşa's authorial intention that aims at instructing an audience through a narrative of charisma, founded on a specific representation of Mustafa Kemal for the purpose of propagating a black-and-white perception of history and politics.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adıvar, Halide Edip. The Turkish Ordeal. New York: The Century Co., 1928.Google Scholar
Atay, Falih Rıfkİ. Çankaya, İstanbul: Bateş, 1998.Google Scholar
Baker, Stephen. The Fiction of Postmodernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Balabanlılar, Mürşit, ed. Türk Romanında Kurtuluş Savaşı. İstanbul: Türkiye iş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2003.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Rustle of Language. Translated by Howard, Richard. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Cilasun, Emrah. “Trabzon'da Çeteciliğin Serüvenine Doğru Küçük Bir Ufuk Turu: ‘Ya Devlet Başa, Ya Kuzgun Leşe.’Toplumsal Tarih, no. 149 (2006): 5257.Google Scholar
Cohn, Dorrit. The Distinction of Fiction. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuddon, J. A.The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Termsand Literary Theory. 4 ed. London: Penguin, 1999.Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomir. “Fictional and Historical Narrative: Meeting the Postmodern Challenge.” In Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis, edited by Herman, David, 247-73. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Dubrow, Heather. Genre. New York: Methuen, 1982.Google Scholar
Duff, David, ed. Modern Genre Theory. Essex: Longman, 2000.Google Scholar
Evin, Ahmet Ö. Origins and Development of the Turkish Novel. Minneapolis: Bibliotheca Islamica, 1983.Google Scholar
Finn, Robert. The Early Turkish Novel 1872-1900. İstanbul: Isis Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Fleishman, Avrom. The English Historical Novel: Walter Scott to Virginia Woolf. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Fowler, Alastair. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens: A Study of Play Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
İlhan, Attilâ. Allahın Süngüleri: “Reis Paşa”, İstanbul: Türkiye iş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2002.Google Scholar
İlhan, Attilâ. Dersaadet'te Sabah Ezanları. Ankara: Bilgi, 1981.Google Scholar
İlhan, Attilâ. Gâzi Paşa. İstanbul: Türkiye iş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2006.Google Scholar
İlhan, Attilâ. ‘o karanlıkta biz’, İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2003.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Historical Novel. Translated by Mitchell, Hannah and Mitchell, Stanley. Middlesex: Penguin, 1962.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. Theory of the Novel. Translated by Bostock, Anna. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar
McHale, Brian. Postmodernist Fiction. London: Routledge, 1987.Google Scholar
Norton, Anne. Reflections on Political Identity. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Nureddin, Vâlâ. Bu Dünyadan Nâzım Geçti, İstanbul: Remzi, 1965.Google Scholar
Özakman, Turgut. Şu Çılgın Türkler. Ankara: Bilgi, 2005.Google Scholar
Roberts, Geoffrey, ed. The History and Narrative Reader. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg. “Characters, Persons, Selves, Individuals.” In Theory of the Novel: A Historical Approach, edited by McKeon, Michael, 537-53. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Sezer, Sennur. “Attilâ İlhan'dan Bağımsızlığa Aydınlara, Geçmişe Dair Sorular.” Radikal Kitap, 6 January 2006.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan Rubin. Authoritarian Fictions: The Ideological Novel as a Literary Genre. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Tanzimat'tan Bugüne Edebiyatçılar Ansiklopedisi. 2 vols. Vol. 1. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2001.Google Scholar
Timur, Taner. Osmanlı-Türk Romanında Tarih, Toplum, Kimlik, İstanbul: Afa, 1991.Google Scholar
Türkeş, A. Ömer. “Romana Yazılan Tarih.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 91 (2001/2002): 166213.Google Scholar
Turna, Burak, and Uçar, Orkun. Metal Fırtına. İstanbul: Timaş, 2004.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. Metahistoıy: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.Google Scholar