Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:47:42.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Public choice and foreign affairs: Democracy and international relations in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Ersin Kalaycıoğlu*
Affiliation:
Sabancı University, Orhanlı, Tuzla, 34956, İstanbul, [email protected]

Abstract

In a democracy it is through the process of voting that people find an opportunity to register their likes and dislikes of domestic and foreign policy decisions most effectively. In Turkey, the recent national elections on 22 July 2007 provided an opportunity to observe the nexus between voters’ choices and foreign policy issues. Questions pertaining to problems facing the country and the campaign issues fail to give any clue as to whether people paid attention to foreign policy in making their choices among the political parties of the country. However, a closer examination of the factors determining the vote indicates that, although party identification and satisfaction with the performance of the economy and the expectations of the government in managing the economy played major roles, attitudes towards the European Union (EU), nationalism, and globalization closely followed in magnitude those two factors in determining the voters’ party preferences across the left-right spectrum. While AKP supporters had the most favorable attitude towards the EU, MHP supporters appeared highly nationalistic, and CHP voters seemed most influenced by positive orientations to openness to the world.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Çarkoğlu, Ali. “Ideology or Economic Pragmatism? Profiling Turkish Voters in 2007.Turkish Studies, vol. 9, no. 2 (2008): 317–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çarkoğlu, Ali, and Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. Turkish Democracy Today: Elections, Participation and Stability in an Islamic Society. London: I. B. Tauris, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergüder, Üstün. “Changing Patterns of Electoral Behavior in Turkey.Boğaziçi University Journal 8-9 (1980-1981): 4569.Google Scholar
Ergüder, Üstün, and Hofferbert, Richard I.. “The 1983 General Elections in Turkey: Continuity or Change in Voting Patterns.” In Stote, Democracy and the Military: Turkey in the 1980s, edited by Heper, Metin and Evin, Ahmet, 81192. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esmer, Yılmaz. “At the Ballot Box: Determinants of Voting Behavior.” In Politics, Parties, and Elections in Turkey, edited by Sayan, Sabri and Esmer, Yılmaz, 91114. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esmer, Yılmaz. “Parties and the Electorate: A Comparative Analysis of Voter Profiles of Turkish Political Parties.” In Turkey: Political, Social and Economic Challenges in the 1990s, edited by Balım, Çiğdem, 7489. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. “Attitudinal Orientation to Party Organizations in Turkey in the 2000s.9, no. 2 (2008): 297316.Google Scholar
Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. “Elections and Party Preferences in Turkey: Changes and Continuities in the 1990s.Comparative ‘ Political Studies 27, no. 3 (1994): 402–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. “Justice and Development Party at the Helm: Resurgence of Islam or Restitution of Right of Center Predominant Party?Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association Palmer House, Chicago, Illinois, 3-6 April 2008.Google Scholar
Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. “The Shaping of Party Preferences in Turkey: Coping with the Post-Cold War Era.New Perspectives on Turkey, no. 20 (1999): 4776.Google Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. Contemporary Turkish Politics. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. “The Turkish Party System: Institutionalization, Polarization, and Fragmentation.Middle Eastern Studies 17, no. 2 (1981): 228–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, Alan. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar