Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:54:31.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power or Leisure? Remarks on the Architecture of the European Summer Embassies on the Bosphorus Shore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

Paolo Girardelli
Paolo Girardelli*
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi University Department of History, 34342 Bebek, İstanbul, Turkey
*
[email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study is part of a larger project on the Landscapes of the Eastern Question, contextualizing the architecture of diplomacy in İstanbul as a symbolic and material refraction of changing power balances and representational strategies. In Beyoğlu, where most of the main diplomatic residences were located, the embassies were originally Ottoman wooden konak structures, but, in time, the increasing influence of Russia, Great Britain and France fostered their monumentalization and the adoption of European academic classicism. By contrast, the summer embassies on the European shore of the Bosphorus remained largely local in terms of technology, image, materials, and spatial layout until the end of the Ottoman Empire. The paper argues that, for many diplomats, a stately winter residence representing national identity, along with a summer house in the spirit of the local traditions, would be used as a communicative and performative resource in the drama of European-Ottoman relations. It also evaluates foreign settlement on the northern shore of the Bosphorus as conforming to a strategy of surveillance and control in keeping with the strategic relevance and contested status of the straits.

Keywords

İstanbulurban and architectural historyEuropean presenceArchitecture and diplomacyBosphoruslandscape and settlementOttoman-European relationseighteenth and nineteenth centuriesthe Eastern Question
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 50: Special Issue on “Ambivalent Architectures” from the Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic , Spring 2014 , pp. 29 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agstner, Rudolf. “Der Palazzo di Venezia in Konstantinopel als k.k. Internuntiatur und k.u.k. Botschaft bei der Hohen Pforte 1799–1918 und das Palais in Yeniköy als Sommersitz der k.u.k. Botschaft 1899–1918.” In Österreich in Istanbul, edited by Agstner, Rudolf and Samsinger, Elmar, 19–108. Vienna: Lit Verlag, 2010.Google Scholar
Ahmad, Feroz. “Ottoman Perceptions of the Capitulations, 1800–1914.” Journal of Islamic Studies 11, no. 1 (2000): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki Girardelli, Miyuki. “Léon Parvillée’s Early Years in Istanbul: Cezayirlioğlu Mansion and the Church of Surp Krikor Luzavoriç in Kuzguncuk.” in Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Turkish Art, edited by Hitzel, Frédéric, 89–95. Ankara, Kültür Bakanlığı, 2013.Google Scholar
Ardaman, Emel. “Perspective and Istanbul, the Capital of the Ottoman Empire.” Journal of Design History 20 (2007): 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artan, Tulay. Architecture as a Theatre of Life: Profile of the Eighteenth Century Bosphorus. PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, 1989.Google Scholar
Awad, Mohamed. “The Metamorphoses of Mansheyah.” Mediterraneans 8-9 (Fall 1996): 42–57.Google Scholar
Bachman, Martin. “Epochenwalde am Bosphorus: Die bauliche Entwicklung auf dem Gelände der deutschen Sommerresidenz in Tarabya/Boğaziçi’nde Çağdönümü: Alman Sefareti’nin Tarabya Yazlık Rezidansı’ndaki Mimari Gelişim.” in Deutsche Präsenz am Bosphorus/Boğaziçi’ndeki Almanya, edited by von Kummer, Matthias (İstanbul: Consulate General of Germany, 2009): 117-35.Google Scholar
Baratta, Antonio. Costantinopoli effigiata e descritta. Genova: Fontana, 1840.Google Scholar
Bareilles, Bertrand. Constantinole, sés cités franques et levantines: Péra, Galata, banlieue. Paris: Editions Bossard, 1918.Google Scholar
Batur, Afife. “Late Ottoman Istanbul.” in Istanbul: World City. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı, 1996: 154–175. Exhibition catalog.Google Scholar
Berridge, Geoff R.British Diplomacy in Turkey, 1583 to the Present: A Study in the Evolution of the Resident Embassy. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berridge, Geoff R.et al.The Palgrave Macmillan Dictionary of Diplomacy, 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Bertelé, Tommaso. Il palazzo degli ambasciatori di venezia a Costantinopoli e le sue antiche memorie. Bologna: Casa editrice Apollo, 1932.Google Scholar
Borgese, Giuseppe Antonio. Autunno di Costantinopoli. Milano: Treves, 1929.Google Scholar
The Builder 4, no. 167 (1846).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casa, Jean-Michel. Le Palais de France á Istanbul/Istanbul’da bir Fransız Sarayı. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 1995.Google Scholar
Cerasi, Maurice. “The Formation of Ottoman House Types: A Comparative Study in Interaction with Neighboring Cultures.” Muqarnas 15 (1998): 116-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cezar, Mustafa. “The Architectural Decoration of Dolmabahce and Beylerbeyi Palaces.” in National Palaces 1992, 8–29. İstanbul: Milli Saraylar Yayınları, 1992.Google Scholar
Clifford, James. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cockerell, Charles R.Travels in Southern Europe and the Levant, 1810–1817: The Journal of C.R. Cockerell, R.A., edited by his son Samuel Pepys Cockerell. London, New York and Bombay: Longmans, Green and Co., 1903.Google Scholar
Coller, Ian. “East of Enlightenment: Regulating Cosmopolitanism between Istanbul and Paris in the Eighteenth Century.” Journal of World History 21, no. 3 (2010): 447–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crinson, Marc. Empire Building: Orientalism and Victorian Architecture. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Zeynep, Çelik. “Bouvard’s Boulevards: Beaux Arts Planning in Istanbul.” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 43, no. 4 (1984): 341–355.Google Scholar
Zeynep, Çelik. The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Flood, Finbarr Barry. Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval “Hindu-Muslim” Encounter. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gavin, Carney E. S.Imperial Self-Portrait: The Ottoman Empire as Revealed in the Sultan Abdul-Hamid II’s Photographic Albums. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University, Office of the University Publisher, 1989.Google Scholar
Girardelli, Paolo. “Sheltering Diversity: Levantine Architecture in Late Ottoman Istanbul.” in Multicultural Urban Fabric and Types in the South and Eastern Mediterranean, edited by Cerasi, Mauriceet al., 113-40. Beirut: Herausgegeben vom Orient-Institut, Beiruter Texte und Studien, 2007.Google Scholar
Girardelli, Paolo. “Italian Architects in an Ottoman Context: Perspectives and Assesments.” İAE (İstanbul Araştırmaları Enstitüsü) Yıllığı 1 (2012): 101–122.Google Scholar
Göçek, Fatma Müge. “Ethnic Segmentation, Western Education, and Political Outcomes: Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Society.” Poetics Today 14, no. 3, (1993): 507–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Graphic, May 3, 1877.Google Scholar
de Groot, Alexander. “Protection and Nationality: The Decline of the Dragomans.” in Istanbul et les langues orientales: actes du colloque organisé par l’IFEA et l’INALCO a l’occasion du bicentenaire de l’Ecole des langues orientales, İstanbul, 29-31 mai 1995, edited by Hitzel, Frédéric, 235–255. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1997.Google Scholar
de Groot, Alexander. “The Historical Development of the Capitulatory Regime in the Ottoman Middle East from the Fifteenth to the Nineteenth Centuries.” Oriente Moderno 22, no. 3 (2003).Google Scholar
Gül, Murat. The Emergence of Modern Istanbul: Transformation and Modernisation of a City. London and New York: I. B. Tauris, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltem O., Gürel “Dolmabahce as a Liminal Space.” in 150. Yılında Dolmabahçe Sarayı Uluslararası Sempozyumu, Bildiriler 1, edited by Kahraman, K., 261–274. İstanbul: Milli Saraylar Yayınları, 2007: 261-74.Google Scholar
Hamadeh, Shirine. “Ottoman Expressions of Early Modernity and the ‘Inevitable’ Question of Westernization.” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 63, no. 1 (March 2004): 32–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamadeh, Shirine. The City’s Pleasures: Istanbul in the Eighteenth Century. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2008.Google Scholar
İrez, Feryal and Aksu, Hüsamettin. Boğaziçi Sefarethaneleri. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 1992.Google Scholar
Karpat, Kemal. Ottoman Population, 1830–1914: Demographic and Social Characteristics. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kasimova, Irina. Pycckuŭĸ მϐopeu ϐ Cmaмϭyπe/İstanbul’da bir Rus Saraı/The Russian Palace in Istanbul. İstanbul: Tuskon, 2012.Google Scholar
Levant Herald, December 2, 1872.Google Scholar
Memmo, Andrea. Elementi dell’architettura Lodoliana, ossia l’arte del fabbricare con solidità scientifica ed eleganza non capricciosa. Zadar and Milan: Societa editrice dei classici dell’architettura civile, 1831.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. Colonizing Egypt. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Lady Mary Wortley, Letters Of The Right Honourable Lady M——Y W——Y M——E, Reprint of the 1790 London edition: Project Gutenberg, 2006, http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/17520/pg17520.htmlGoogle Scholar
Öncel, A. Derin. Apartman: Galata’da Yeni Bir Konut Tipi. İstanbul: Kitap Yayınevi, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzi, Massimiliano. Aspettando la pace. Il Levante ottomano nei documenti diplomatici napoletani, 1806– 1812. Rossano: Studio Zeta, 1992.Google Scholar
Pinon, Pierre. “Notes sur les résidences de France en Turquie durant la première moitie du 19e siècle.” in L’empire ottoman, la Republique de Turquie et la France, Varia Turcica 3, edited by Batu, H. and Bacqué-Grammont, J. L., 151–168. İstanbul; Paris: Isis, 1986.Google Scholar
Pinon, Pierre. “Résidences de France dans l’Empire ottoman: notes sur l’architecture domestique.” in Les villes dans l’Empire ottoman: activités et societés 2, edited by Panzac, Daniel, 47–84. Paris: CNRS, 1994.Google Scholar
Rozakis, Christos L. and Stagos, Petros N.The Turkish Straits. Dordrecht, The Netherlands and Boston: M. Nijhoff, 1987.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Steven T.The Politics of Dependency: Urban Reform in Istanbul. Westport, CT., and London: Greenwood Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Saint-Priest, Comte de. Mémoires: Règnes de Louis XV et de Louis XVI: La révolution et l’émigration. Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1929.Google Scholar
Sezer, Yavuz. “Bir Türk Âşiânı Yapmak: Yirminci Yüzyıl Başlarında Geleneksel Osmanlı Evinin Tarihî Miras ve Mimari Model Olarak Algılanışı.” in Mimar Kemalettin ve Çağı: Mimarlık, Toplumsal Yaşam, Politika, edited by Cengizkan, Ali, 103–116. Ankara: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası ve Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü, 2009.Google Scholar
Stamboul, August 12, 1913.Google Scholar
Ubicini, Abdolonyme. La Turquie actuelle. Paris: L. Hachette, 1855.Google Scholar
Venturi, Franco. The End of the Old Regime in Europe, 1776–1789, vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yurdusev, A. Nuri, ed. Ottoman Diplomacy: Conventional or Unconventional? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaccagnini, Giuseppe. La vita a Costantinopoli. Torino: Bocca, 1909.Google Scholar
Zandi-Sayek, Sibel. Ottoman İzmir: The Rise of a Cosmopolitan Port, 1840–1880. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Zarinebaf, Fariba. Crime and Punishment in Istanbul, 1700–1800. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010.Google Scholar