Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:53:06.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Play of Memory, Counter-Memory: Building İzmir on Smyrna’s Ashes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Biray Kolluoğlu-Kırlı
Biray Kolluoğlu-Kırlı*
Affiliation:
Sociology Department, SUNY-Binghamton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Were the relationships between streets, homes, and groups inhabiting them wholly accidental and of short duration, then men might tear down their homes, district, and city, only to rebuild another on the same site according to a different set of plans. But even if stones are moveable, relationships established between stones and men are not so easily altered.

(Halbwachs 1980, p. 133)

As you approach contemporary İzmir from the bay, the city that lies ahead of you invokes images of a fortress city. It is enveloped by an unbroken concrete wall made up of tall apartment buildings, one morphing into the other, only to be interrupted by narrow streets. Republic Square, located at the very tip of the bay, resembles a gate to this immense fortress. If you walk half a kilometer eastward through this opening, you will arrive at a large green space at the heart of the city, quite unusual for, modern cities in Turkey. This is the Kültürpark, where İzmirians go to jog, play tennis, have their wedding ceremonies, take their children to play, and watch theatrical and musical performances. Its trees and flower gardens infuse life in a city that has fallen prey to the invasion of concrete as a result of unplanned over-urbanization. Toward the end of each summer, the park becomes even livelier with the opening of the annual Izmir International Fair on the grounds. The Fair attracts some four million visitors every year, and even though the majority are İzmirians, people from other parts of Turkey also flock to İzmir to view the pavilions of Japan, China, U.S.A., and England, as well as those showcasing Turkey’s national firms (Fuar Kataloğu 2000).

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 26 , Spring 2002 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

69. İzmir Enternasyonal Fuarı Kataloğu 2000.Google Scholar
Newspapers and periodicals: Ahenk; Hizmet; Anadolu; Belediyeler Dergisi; İzmir Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası Mecmuası.Google Scholar
Agnew, J. A., and Duncan, J. S., eds. 1989. The Power of Place: Bringing Together Geographical and Sociological Imagination. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Ahmad, F. 1993. The Making of Modern Turkey. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aksoy, Y. 1992. Izmir Rehberi. İzmir: Print Basım Hizmetleri Ltd.Google Scholar
Alonso, A. M. 1988. “The Effects of Truth: Representations cf the Past and the Imagining of Community,” Journal of Historical Sociology 1, no. 1, pp. 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. “The Politics of Space, Time, and Substance: State Formation, Nationalism, and Ethnicity,” Annual Review of Anthropology 23, pp. 379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities, rev. ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Arantes, A.A. 1996. “Symbolic Boundaries and Liminalities in Urban Space,” Theory, Culture and Society 13, no. 4, pp. 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atay, F.R. 1969. Çankaya. İ;stanbul: Doğan Kardeş Matbaası.Google Scholar
Balakrishnan, G., ed. 1996. Mapping the Nation. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Baskin, F. 1941. Eski ve Yeni Devirlerde İzmir Belediyesi. İzmir: Marifet Matbaası.Google Scholar
Behar, B.E. 1992. İktidar ve Tarih: Türkiye’de “Resmi Tarih” Tezinin Oluşumu (1927-1937). İstanbul: Afa Yayınları.Google Scholar
Berkes, N. 1963. Development of Secularism in Turkey. Montreal: McGill University Press.Google Scholar
Bilget, A., and Kemal, N. Y.. 1946. İktisadi Hayatımızda İzmir Fuarı. İzmir: Pazar Neşriyat Yurdu.Google Scholar
Bittner, S.V. 1998. “Green Cities and Orderly Streets: Space and Culture in Moscow, 1923-1928,” Journal of Urban History 25, no. 1, pp. 22–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, M.C. 1994. The City of Collective Memory: Its Historical Memory and Architectural Entertainments. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bozdoğan, S. 2001. Modernism and Nation Building: Turkish Architectural Culture in the Early Republic. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Carter, E., et al. 1993. Space and Place: Theories of Identity and Location. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Corrigan, P., and Sayer, D.. 1985. The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crang, M., and Thrift, N.. 2000. Thinking Space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Rendali, Steven F.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Emre, N. 1940. “Mimari Bakımdan İzmir Fuarı,” İktisadi Yürüyüş 2, no. 17, p. 17.Google Scholar
Ergut, T.E. 1998. Making a National Architecture: Architecture and the Nation-State in Early Republican Turkey. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Binghamton University Google Scholar
Evin, A. 1984. Modern Turkey: Continuity and Change. Istanbul: Schriften des Deutschen Orient-Instituts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, D. 2000. Lost Time: On Remembering and Forgetting in Late Modern Culture. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. 1980. The Collective Memory, trans. Ditter, Francis J. and Ditter, Vita Yazdi. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hayden, D. 1995. The Power of Place: Urban Landscapes as Public History. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ivanova, К. 1939. Parks of Culture and Rest in the Soviet Union. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Izmir Rehberi. 1934. Istanbul: İzmir ve Havalisi Asariatika Muhipleri Cemiyeti Neşriyatından.Google Scholar
Kayın, E. 2000. İzmir Oteller Tarihi. İzmir: İzmir Büyük Şehir Belediyesi Kültür Yayını.Google Scholar
Klein, N.M. 1998. The History of Forgetting: Los Angeles and the Erasure of Memory. London and New York: Verso, 1998.Google Scholar
Kusno, A. 1998. “Beyond the Postcolonial: Architecture and Political Cultures in Indonesia,” Public Culture 10, no. 10, pp. 549–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H. 2000. The Production of Space, trans. Nicholson-Smith, Donald. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, B. 1968. The Emergence of Modern Turkey, 2d ed. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, K. 1960. The Image of the City. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Malkki, L. 1992. “National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity Among Scholars and Refugees,” Cultural Anthropology 7 (1), pp. 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, D. 1994. “Double Articulation: A Place in the World,” pp. 110–21 in Displacements: Cultural Identities in Question, ed. Bammer, Angelika. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, D. 1993. “The City and the Imaginary,” trans. Koumantarakis, John, pp. 285–301 in Space and Place: Theories of Identity and Location, ed. et al, Carter. London: Lawrence and Washrag.Google Scholar
Nalbantoğlu, G.B. 1989. The Professionalization of the Ottoman Turkish Architecture. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Nora, P. 1996. Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ökçün, G. 1997. Türkiye İktisat Kongresi 1923-İzmir, Haberler, Belgeler, Yorumlar. Ankara: Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu.Google Scholar
Özgünel, N. Y. 2000. “İzmir Kültürpark-Fuar Fikrinin Doğuşu ve Suad Yurdoğlu,” İzmir Kent Kültürü Dergisi, no. 1, pp. 176–88.Google Scholar
Pöğün, Y. 2000. The Reflections of Modernization in Turkey on the Architectural Artifacts of İzmir Culturepark Between 1930 and 1950. Unpublished M.A. thesis, İzmir Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. 1989. “Place and Culture: Two Disciplines, Two Concepts, Two Images of Christ and a Single Goal,” pp. 140–56 in The Power of Place: Bringing Together Geographical and Sociological Imagination, ed. Agnew, John A. and Duncan, James S.. Boston: Un win Hyman.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, G.D. 2000. Munich and Memory: Architecture, Monuments, and the Legacy of the Third Reich. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, K. 1994.”The Politics of Memory: Black Emancipation and the Civil War Monument,” pp. 127–50 in Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity, ed. Gillis, John R.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Say, M. 1941. İjiyen Bakımından İzmir Şehri. İzmir: Bilgi Matbaası.Google Scholar
Schama, S. 1995. Landscape and Memory. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Serçe, E. 1998. Tanzimat’tan Cumhuriyete İzmir’de Belediye (1868-1945). İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Yayınlan.Google Scholar
Shaw, S., and Shaw, E. K.. 1977. History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Vol. II: Reform, Revolution, and Republic: The Rise of Modern Turkey, 1808-1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soja, E. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Sönmezdağ, U. 1978. Atatürk Ormanı ve Kurtuluş Abidesi-İzmir Tarihinde Sergi, Panayır, Fuar, ve Kültürpark. İzmir: İzmir Atatürk Ormanı Koruma Derneği Yayınları.Google Scholar
Tekeli, İ. 1978. “Cumhuriyet Döneminde (1923-1973) Türkiye’de Belediyeciliğin Evrimi,” in Türkiye’de Belediyeciliğin Evrimi, Türk İdareciler Derneği, ed. Türkcan, Ergun. Ankara.Google Scholar
Tuan, Y. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Uludağ, Z. 1998. “Cumhuriyet Döneminde Rekreasyon ve Gençlik Parkı Örneği,” pp. 65–75 in 75 Yılda Değişen Kent ve Mimarlık, ed. Sey, Yıldızet al. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yayınları.Google Scholar
Vale, L.J. 1992. Architecture, Power, and National Identity. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, E. 2000. “İzmir Kenti Üzerine Alternatif Tarih Yazımı,” İzmir Kent Kültürü Dergisi, no. 1, pp. 68–72.Google Scholar
Young, J.E. 1989.. “The Biography of a Memorial Icon: Nathan Rapoport’s Warsaw Ghetto Monument,” Representations, vol. 26, pp. 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J.E. 1992. “The Counter-Monument: Memory Against Itself in Germany Today,” Critical Inquiry, vol. 18, pp. 267–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yurtman, Lale Kıvılcım. 1996. 1933-1950 Yıllarında İzmir Enternasyonel Fuarı. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
Zube, Ervin H., ed. 1970. Landscapes: Selected Writings of J. B. Jackson. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar