Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:06:11.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nostalgia for an Imaginary Home: Memory, Space, and Identity in the New Turkish Cinema

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

F. Asuman Suner*
Affiliation:
Department of Communication and Design, Bilkent University

Extract

Since the mid-1990s we have been witnessing the emergence of a “new Turkish cinema.” A number of young directors, among them Zeki Demirkubuz, Derviş Zaim, Yeşim Ustaoğlu, Serdar Akar, and Nuri Bilge Ceyhan, made their first feature films during this period and have proved to be quite prolific since then. Acclaimed by critics in Turkey and abroad, recent Turkish films have received invitations from major international festivals and have won prestigious awards. The new Turkish cinema has also generated its own brand of audience. While Turkish films had largely disappeared from theaters for most of the 1980s due to severe economic adversities in the film industry, local viewers had, in any case, distanced themselves from Turkish cinema on the grounds of its presumed “banality,” the term “Turkish film” having become almost synonymous with “bad taste” for a decade prior to the arrival of the new Turkish cinema. Since the 1990s, however, Turkish films have once again begun to attract audiences to theaters, signaling that the long lost reputation of Turkish cinema may have been restored.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abisel, Nilgün. 1994. Türk Sineması Üzerine Yazılar, Istanbul: Imge.Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston. 1994. The Poetics of Space: The Classic Look at How We Experience Intimate Places. Boston: Beacon PressGoogle Scholar
Bora, Tanil. 2001/2002. “Son Yirmi Yılı Ayrıştırmak İçin Notlar,” Birikim, 152(53), pp. 5560.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1986 (1901). The Psychopathology of Everyday Life. London: The Hogart Press.Google Scholar
Game, Ann. 1995. “Time, Space, Memory with Reference to Bachelard,” in Featherstone, Mikeet al. (Eds.), Global Modernities. London: Sage, pp. 192208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, Natalia Chan Sui. 2000. “Rewriting History: Hong Kong Nostalgia Cinema and Its Social Practice,” in Desser, David and Fu, Poshek (Eds.), The Cinema of Hong Kong: History, Arts, Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 252272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyssen, Andreas. 1995. Twilight Memories: Marking Time in a Culture of Amnesia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1991. Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1983. “Postmodernism and Consumer Society,” in Foster, Hal (Ed.), The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture. Seattle: Bay Press, pp. 111125.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar and Ayşe, Öncü. 1993. Istanbul and the Concept of World Cities. Istanbul: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.Google Scholar
Keyman, E. Fuat. 2002. “Globalleşme ve Türk Kapitalizminin Kültürel Ekonomisi,” Toplum ve Bilim, 93, pp. 83109.Google Scholar
Keyman, E. Fuat. 2000. Türkiye ve Radikal Demokrasi, Istanbul: Alfa.Google Scholar
Maktav, Hilmi. 2001/2002. “Türk Sinemasında Yeni Bir Dönem,” Birikim, 152-3, pp. 225233.Google Scholar
Sarıbay, Ali Yaşar. 2000. “Türkiye'de Demokrasi ve Sivil Toplum,” in Keyman, Fuat and Sarıbay, Ali Yaşar (Eds.), Global Yerel Ekseninde Türkiye, istanbul: Alfa, pp. 99118.Google Scholar
Suner, Asuman. 2002. “1990'lar Türk Sinemasından Taşra Görüntüleri: Masumiyet'te Döngü, Kapatılmışlık, Klostrofobi…ve İroni,” Toplum ve Bilim, 92, pp. 176203.Google Scholar
Suner, Asuman. 2001. “Bir Bağlantı Koparma Aracı Olarak Türkiye'de Cep Telefonu: Kriz, Göç ve Aidiyet,” Toplum ve Bilim, 90, pp. 114130.Google Scholar
Tekeli, Şirin. 1995. “Women in Turkey in the 1980s,” in Tekeli, Şirin (Ed.), Women in Modern Turkish Society. London: Zed Books, pp. 122.Google Scholar