Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T05:19:45.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-Market Mechanisms of Market Formation: The Development of the Consumer Durables Industry in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Ayşe Buğra
Ayşe Buğra*
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi University, Department of Economics.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper discusses the role played by the extensive, nation-wide network of sales agents organized by the leading Turkish manufacturer of consumer durables, Arçelik, in the formation of mass consumption markets in the post-Second World War era. The case study attempts to draw attention to a relatively less explored dimension of the industrialization experience of developing countries by shifting the usual emphasis on the structure of production toward the organization of consumption. This shift of emphasis serves to highlight certain society-specific mechanisms of market formation which compensate the limitations of the market-forming role of the state in the context of twentieth-century late industrialization.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 19 , fall 1998 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aglietta, M. 1979. A Theory of Economie Regulation. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Amin, S. 1971. Accumulation à l'echelle mondiale. Paris: Editions Anthropos.Google Scholar
Amsden, A. 1990. “Third World Industrialization: ‘Global Fordism’ or A New Model?,” New Left Review, 182, pp. 5–31.Google Scholar
Ayda Bir (monthly Arçelik newspaper; various issues).Google Scholar
Biggart, N. Woolsey and Hamilton, G.. 1992. “On the Limits of a Firm-Based Theory to Explain Business Networks: The Western Bias of Neo-Classical Economics,” in Nohria, N. and Eccles, R.G. (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, Action. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 471–490.Google Scholar
Boyer, R. 1991. “The Eighties: The Search for Alternatives to Fordism,” in Jessop, B.et al.(eds.), The Politics of Flexibility. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 106–132.Google Scholar
Brewer, J. and Porter, R. 1993. Consumption and the World of Goods. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buğra, A. 1994. State and Business in Modern Turkey. A Comparative Study. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. 1987. The Romantic Ethic and The Spirit of Modern Consumerism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cole, S. and Miles, I. 1984. Worlds Apart. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
Dauten, C. 1956. Financing the American Consumer, Consumer Credit Monograph No. 1, St. Louis, Missouri: American Investment Company of Illinois.Google Scholar
Easton, G. and Araujo, L.. 1989. “The Network Approach: An Articulation,” Advances in International Marketing, 3, pp. 97–119.Google Scholar
Ekşioğlu, U. 1985. “Arçelik'te 27 Yıl,” Ayda Bir, October.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J.. 1994. “Network Analysis, Culture, and Problem of Agency,” American Journal of Sociology, 99, pp. 1411–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, D. 1982. “Interrelations between Consumption, Economic Growth and Income Distribution in Latin America since 1800,” in Baudet, H. and Meulen, H. van de (eds.), Consumer Behavior and Economic Growth in the Modern Economy. London: Croom Helm, pp. 133–177.Google Scholar
Furtado, C. 1983. Accumulation and Development. The Logic of Industrial Civilization. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Gelpi, R.-M. et Bruyere, F.J. La. 1994. Histoire du credit à la consommation: Doctrines et pratiques. Paris: Decouverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp. 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunder-Frank, A. 1972. Lumpenbourgeoisie-Lumpendevelopment. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, M.L. 1990. “Welfare State Struggles, Consumption and the Politics of Rights,” Capital and Class, 42, pp. 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Postmoder nity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. 1988. Economics and Institutions. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lash, S. and Urry, J. 1994. Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lee, M. 1993. Consumer Society Reborn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipietz, A. 1987. Mirages and Miracles. The Crises of Global Fordism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lipietz, A. 1982. “Towards Global Fordism?,” New Left Review, 132, pp. 33–47.Google Scholar
McKendrick, N., Brewer, J., Plumb, J.H. 1982. The Birth of A Consumer Society. The Commercialization of Eighteenth Century England. London: Europa Publications.Google Scholar
National Commission on Consumer Finance. 1972. Consumer Credit in the United States, report presented to the American Congress.Google Scholar
National Consumer Finance Association. 1962. The Consumer Finance Industry: A Monograph Prepared for the Commission on Money and Credit. Engle wood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Nerfin, M. (ed.) 1977. Another Development. Approaches and Strategies. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjold Foundation.Google Scholar
Piore, M.J. and Sabel, C.. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation, New York: Reinhart Inc.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. 1957. “The Economy as Instituted Process,” in Polanyi, K.et al. (eds.), Trade and Market in the Early Empires. Chicago: Gateway, pp. 243–269.Google Scholar
Powell, W.M. and Smith-Doerr, L.. 1994. “Networks and Economic Life,” in Smelser, N.J. and Swedberg, R. (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, pp. 243–269.Google Scholar
Melin, L. 1989. “The Field of Force Metaphor,” Advances in International Marketing, 3, pp. 161–179.Google Scholar
Solakoğlu, C. 1987. “Taksitli Satışlarda Bugünkü Düzen ve Uygulamada Taksitli Satışlar,” unpublished paper presented at the Conference on Sales by Installments organized by Istanbul Chamber of Commerce, Istanbul.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics. 1963. Statistical Yearbook of Turkey 1963. Ankara.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics. 1968. Statistical Yearbook of Turkey 1968. Ankara.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics. 1991. Statistical Indicators: 1923-1990. Ankara.Google Scholar
Stewart, F. 1985. Planning to Meet Basic Needs. New York: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunkel, O. 1973. “Transnational Capitalism and National Disintegration in Latin America,” Social and Economic Studies, 19, pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
Unesco. 1963. Statistical Yearbook. Paris.Google Scholar
Vorstermans, J.J. 1966. Consumer Credit: Various Economic Aspects With Specific Reference to Canada, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Catholic University of Tilburg.Google Scholar
Yüksel, A.S. 1978. “Taksitli Satışlar için ne Yapılabilir?,” Milliyet, 10 February 1978.Google Scholar