Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:15:44.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new perspective on women’s care burden and employment in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2021

Çisel Ekiz Gökmen Open the ORCID record for Çisel Ekiz Gökmen [Opens in a new window]
Çisel Ekiz Gökmen*
Affiliation:
Mugla Sıtkı Koçman University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Labour Economics and Industrial Relations, Kotekli, 48000 Mugla, Turkey Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Women’s intra-household care burden is one of the main reasons behind women’s low employment rates in Turkey. Many empirical studies have tested this relationship by focusing on the existence of dependent household members, if any. They have largely overlooked the use of care services and the time spent on caring for dependent household members to evaluate women’s care burden.

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between women’s care burden and employment prospects and status in Turkey from the perspective of access to care services and the time dimension of the care burden. This relationship is analyzed through the logit model by using latest available data from the 2014–2015 Time Use Survey. The article shows that the time spent by women caring for dependent household members, and access to care services, are the most important factors influencing women’s employment probability in Turkey. Benefiting from informal childcare services increases the employment probability of women approximately twenty-seven times, while benefiting from formal childcare services increases two times and informal adult-care services 2.6 times. Ensuring the accessibility of institutional care services improves women’s employment status by enabling women’s transition from part-time to full-time jobs, and from unskilled to professional jobs.

Keywords

womenemploymentcare burdentime uselogit model
Type
Article
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 66 , May 2022 , pp. 11 - 34
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acar-Savran, Gülnur, and Nesrin, Tura Demiryontan. Kadının Görünmeyen Emeği. İstanbul: Yordam, 2008.Google Scholar
Antonopoulos, Rania, Kim, Kijong, Masterson, Thomas, and Zacharias, Ajit. Why President Obama Should Care about “Care”: An Effective and Equitable Investment Strategy for Job Creation. Public Policy Brief No. 108. New York: Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, 2010.Google Scholar
Ayvaz-Kızılgöl, Özlem. “Kadınların İşgücüne Katılımının Belirleyicileri: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz.” Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 13, no. 1 (2012): 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, David and Robins, Philip K.. “Child-Care Costs and Family Labor Supply.” Review of Economics and Statistics 70, no. 3 (1988): 374–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Can, Başak. “Caring for Solidarity? The Intimate Politics of Grandmother Childcare and Neoliberal Conservatism in Urban Turkey.” New Perspectives on Turkey 60 (2019): 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, Arnaud and Viitanen, Tarja K.. “The Causality between Female Labour Force Participation and the Availability of Childcare.” Applied Economics Letters 9, no. 14 (2002): 915–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayıoğlu, Meltem and Cem, Başlevent. “Türkiye’de Gelir Dağılımının ve Yoksulluğun Toplumsal Boyutları.” In Türkiye’de Refah Devleti ve Kadın, edited by Dedeoğlu, Saniye and Adem, Y. Elveren, 127–57. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2012.Google Scholar
Dayıoğlu, Meltem and Murat, Kırdar. Türkiye’de Kadınların İşgücüne Katılımında Belirleyici Etkenler ve Eğilimler. T.C. DPT ve Dünya Bankası Refah ve Sosyal Politika Analitik Çalışma Programı, 2010. Accessed September 9, 2021. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/403561468311115746/pdf/754670NWP0Box300Participation0Women.pdf.Google Scholar
Dedeoğlu, Saniye. “Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rolleri Açısından Türkiye’de Aile ve Kadın Emeği.” Toplum ve Bilim Dergisi 86 (2000): 139–70.Google Scholar
Ecevit, Yıldız. “Feminist Sosyal Politika Bağlamında, Türkiye’de Çocuk Bakımı ve Eğitimine İki Paradigmadan Doğru Bakmak.” In Geçmişten Günümüze Türkiye’de Kadın Emeği, edited by Toksöz, Gülay and Makal, Ahmet, 220–65. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2012.Google Scholar
Ekiz-Gökmen, Çisel. “Farklı Sosyo-Kültürel Yapılarda Evli Kadınların İşgücü Piyasasına Katılımı Üzerine Bir İnceleme.” In Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu Uluslararası Ekonomi Konferansı UEK-TEK, edited by M. Aykut Attar and Hüseyin Karamelikli, 1340–65. Ankara: Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu Vakfı, 2016.Google Scholar
Ekiz-Gökmen, Çisel. “Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Zaman Yoksulluğu: Hane İçi Ücretli ve Ücretsiz Emek Sunumu.” Çalışma ve Toplum 55, no. 4 (2017): 1967–2000.Google Scholar
Gündüz, Umut and İpek, İlkkaracan. “Estimation of the Market Value of the Unpaid Work in Turkey and a Comparison to the EU Economies.” Çalışma ve Toplum 1 (2019): 479–507.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. “Effects of Child-Care Programs on Women’s Work Effort.” Journal of Political Economy 82, no. 2 (1974): 136–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell and Anne, Machung. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking, 2012.Google Scholar
ILO. Care Work and Care Jobs for the Future of Decent Work. Geneva: ILO, 2018. Accessed September 9, 2021. www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_633135.pdf.Google Scholar
ILO. World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends for Women 2018 Global Snapshot. Geneva: ILO, 2018. Accessed September 9, 2021. www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_619577.pdf.Google Scholar
ILO. World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2020. Geneva: ILO, 2020. Accessed September 9, 2021. www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_734455.pdf.Google Scholar
İlkkaracan, İpek, ed. Emek Piyasasında Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliğine Doğru İş ve Aile Yaşamını Uzlaştırma Politikaları. İstanbul: Kadının İnsan Hakları Yeni Çözümler Derneği ve İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi BMT-KAUM, 2010.Google Scholar
İlkkaracan, İpek, “Why So Few Women in the Labor Market in Turkey?” Feminist Economics 18, no. 1 (2012): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İlkkaracan, İpek and Kijong, Kim. The Employment Generation Impact of Meeting SDG Targets in Early Childhood Care, Education, Health and Long-Term Care in 45 Countries. Geneva: ILO, 2019.Google Scholar
İlkkaracan, İpek, Kim, Kjong, and Kaya, Tolga. Sosyal Bakım Hizmetlerine Kamu Yatırımlarının İstihdam, Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği ve Yoksulluğa Etkileri: Türkiye Örneği. İstanbul: İmak Yayınları, 2015.Google Scholar
İnce-Yenilmez, Meltem. “Female Employment and Care Economy in Turkey.” Journal of Sociological Research 22, no. 1 (2019): 69–95.Google Scholar
Kılıç, Dilek and Selcen, Öztürk. “Türkiye’de Kadınların İşgücüne Katılımı Önündeki Engeller ve Çözüm Yolları: Bir Ampirik Uygulama.” Amme İdaresi Dergisi 47, no. 1 (2014): 107–30.Google Scholar
Kıral, Gülsen and Selin, Karlılar. “Türkiye’de Kadın İşgücüne Katılımını Etkileyen Faktörler: Adana İli Üzerine Bir Uygulama.” Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 26, no. 3 (2017): 272–86.Google Scholar
Kiren-Gürler, Özlem and Şenay, Üçdoğruk. “Türkiye’de Cinsiyete Göre Gelir Farklılığının Ayrıştırma Yöntemiyle Uygulanması.” Journal of Yaşar University 2, no. 6 (2007): 571–89.Google Scholar
Lichtenwalter, Sara. “Gender Poverty Disparity in US Cities: Evidence Exonerating Female-Headed Families.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 32, no. 2 (2005): 75–96.Google Scholar
Claudia, Martínez A. and Marcela, Perticará. “Childcare Effects on Maternal Employment: Evidence from Chile.” Journal of Development Economics 126 (2017): 127–37.Google Scholar
Memiş, Emel, Öneş, Umut, and Kızılırmak, Burca. “Housewifisation of Women: Contextualizing Gendered Patterns of Paid and Unpaid Work.” In Gender and Society in Turkey: The Impact of Neo-liberal Policies, Political Islam and EU Accession, edited by Dedeoğlu, Saniye and Adem, Y. Elveren, 87–102. London and New York: IB Tauris, 2012.Google Scholar
MoNE, Millî Eğitim Istatistikleri Örgün Eğitim 2018/’19. Ankara: Resmi İstatistik Programı, 2019. Accessed September 9, 2021. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_09/30102730_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2018_2019.pdf.Google Scholar
OECD. “Work and Job Quality.” In How’s Life? 2020: Measuring Well-being, 88–103. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.Google Scholar
Öneş, Umut, Memiş, Emel, and Kızılırmak, Burca. “Türkiye’de Yoksulluk ve Hane İçi İş Zamanı Dağılımı: Analiz ve Politika Önerileri.” In 2000’ler Türkiye’sinde Sosyal Politika ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet, edited by Saniye Dedeoğlu and Adem Y. Elveren, 123–46. Ankara: İmge Kitapevi Yayınları, 2015.Google Scholar
Özer, Mustafa and Biçerli, Kemal. “Türkiye’de Kadın İşgücünün Panel Veri Analizi.” Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (2003–4): 55–86.Google Scholar
Paull, Gillian. “The Impact of Children on Women’s Paid Work.” Fiscal Studies 27, no. 4 (2006): 473–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekkurnaz, Didem. “Employment Status and Contraceptive Choices of Women with Young Children in Turkey.” Feminist Economics (2019): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribar, David C. “A Structural Model of Child Care and the Labor Supply of Married Women.” Journal of Labor Economics 13, no. 3 (1995): 558–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sallan-Gül, Songül. “Türkiye’de Yoksulluğun Kadınsılaşması.” Amme İdaresi Dergisi 38, no. 1 (2005): 25–45.Google Scholar
Tansel, Aysıt. “Economic Development and Female Labor Force Participation in Turkey: Time-Series Evidence and Cross-Province Estimates.” SSRN Electronic Journal (2001): 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TurkStat. Turkey in Statistics 2019. Ankara: Turkish Statistical Institute, 2020. Accessed September 9, 2021. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/yayin/views/visitorPages/index.zul.Google Scholar
Viitanen, Tarja K. “Cost of Childcare and Female Employment in the UK.” Labour 19 (2005): 149–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. Türkiye’de Çocuk Bakım Hizmetlerinde Arz ve Talep Durumu: Bir Karma Yöntem Çalışması. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2015. Accessed September 9, 2021. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/690781468000932565/pdf/98884-TURKISH-WP-P146295-PUBLIC-Box393197B-Binder-TR.pdf.Google Scholar