Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:51:13.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impacts of the Tax System on Poverty and Social Exclusion: A Case Study on Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Fatoş Gökşen ,
Gökhan Özertan ,
İsmail Sağlam  and
Ünal Zenginobuz
Fatoş Gökşen
Affiliation:
Koç University, Rumeli Feneri Yolu, Sarıyer 34450 İstanbul, Turkey, [email protected]
Gökhan Özertan
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi University, Bebek, İstanbul, Turkey, [email protected]
İsmail Sağlam
Affiliation:
TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Turkey, [email protected]
Ünal Zenginobuz
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi University, Bebek, İstanbul, Turkey, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article makes use of two different data sets on Turkey to explore the relationship between the tax structure and issues such as democratic representation, citizenship rights, and poverty and social exclusion. The first of these data sets is the extensive Household Consumption Survey (2003) by the Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). This extensive survey data allows a very comprehensive quantitative analysis of the tax burden on the consumption baskets of households in different income groups, as well as in different regions of Turkey. The second data set incorporates qualitative data on Turkish citizens' views and attitudes towards different aspects of the Turkish tax system—such as its fairness (justice), transparency, and efficiency in generating funds for public activities—obtained through focus group meetings and in-depth interviews conducted with citizen groups and various stakeholders in cities in different regions in Turkey. The quantitative findings presented in the study clearly reveal that, if anything, taxes are expected to exacerbate the problem of inequality and poverty in Turkey. Heavily relying on regressive consumption taxes results in the poor paying a disproportionate amount of their income as indirect taxes, more so for those in Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia where poverty is more extreme. On the other hand, the qualitative part reveals that ordinary citizens find the current tax system highly unfair and feel that they receive very little in terms of public services in return for the taxes they pay. In spite of the merits attributed in theory to taxation as a means to provide services and thereby legitimize the state, the payment of taxes is met with considerable reluctance. Most of this reluctance is attributable to factors such as the citizens' inability to pay, and a lack of clarity with respect to the obligations and reasons for paying. It also emerges that the unwillingness to pay is a protest against the degradation of public services and the perceptions of unfairness, corruption, and other administrative failings.

Keywords

tax systemTurkeypovertysocial exclusioncitizenshipdemocracyaccountability
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 38: Special Issue on Poverty and Social Exclusion , Spring 2008 , pp. 159 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, Anthony Barnes. Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhalla, Ajit, and Lapeyre, Frédéric. “Social Exclusion: Towards an Analytical and Operational Framework.” Development and Change 28, no. 3 (1997): 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Richard M. “Tax Administration and Tax Reform: Reflections on Experience.” In Tax Policy in Developing Countries, edited by Khalilzadeh-Shirazi, Javad and Shah, Anwar, 38–56. Washington, D. C.: World Bank, 1991.Google Scholar
Burchardt, Tania, Le Grand, Julian, and Piachaud, David. “Social Exclusion in Britain 1991-1995.” Social Policy and Administration 33, no. 3 (1999): 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Robin, and Stern, Nicholas. “Taxation and Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 31, no. 2 (1993): 762–830.Google Scholar
Coady, David. “Fiscal Reform in Developing Countries.” In Fiscal Reforms in the Least Developed Countries, edited by Patel, Chandra Kant, 18–46. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Coady, David, and Drèze, Jean. “Commodity Taxation and Social Welfare: The Generalized Ramsey Rule.” International Tax and Public Finance 9, no. 3 (2002): 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daunton, Martin. Just Taxes: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1914-1979. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heady, Christopher, and Room, Graham. “Patterns of Social Exclusion: Implications for Policy and Research.” In Poverty and Social Exclusion in Europe, edited by Barnes, Matt, 146–154. Northhampton: Edward Elgar, 2002.Google Scholar
Herb, Michael. “No Representation Without Taxation? Rents, Development, and Democracy.” Comparative Politics 37, no. 3 (2003): 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Philipp T., and Norberg, Kathryn. Fiscal Crises, Liberty, and Representative Government, 1450-1789. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jantscher, Milka Casanegra de. Problems in Administering a Value-added Tax in Developing Countries: An Overview, Report No. DRD246, Development Research Department: World Bank, 1987.Google Scholar
Keen, Michael, and Simone, Alejandro. “Tax Policy in Developing Countries: Some Lessons from the 1990s and Some Challenges Ahead.” In Helping Countries Develop: The Role of Fiscal Policy, edited by Gupta, S., Clements, B. and Inchauste, G., 302–352. Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund, 2004.Google Scholar
Madanipour, Ali. Social Exclusion in European Cities: Processes, Experiences and Responses. London: Kingsley, 1995.Google Scholar
Maliye Bakanlığı Hesap Uzmanları Kurulu “Türkiye'de Kayıt Dışı Ekonominin Boyutu.” Ankara: T.C. Maliye Bakanlığı, 2005.Google Scholar
Mayes, David G. “Introduction.” In Social Exclusion and European Policy, edited by Mayes, D., Berghman, J. and Salais, R.. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2001.Google Scholar
Munck, Ronaldo. Globalization and Social Exclusion: A Transformative Perspective. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ong, Aihwa. Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham: Duke University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Paley, Julia. “Toward an Anthropology of Democracy.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (2002): 469–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlings, Gregory. “Cultural Narratives of Taxation and Citizenship: Fairness, Groups and Globalisation.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 38 (2003): 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Friedrich. “Shadow Economies around the World: What Do We Really Know?” European Journal of Political Economy 21, no. 3 (2005): 598–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Hilary, and Miller, S. M.. “Social Exclusion: The European Approach to Social Disadvantage.” Indicators 2, no. 2 (2003): 5–21.Google Scholar
Tanzi, Vito, and Zee, Howell H.. “Tax Policy for Emerging Markets: Developing Countries.” National Tax Journal 53 (2000): 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The State Institute of Statistics, Turkey and World Bank Joint Poverty Assessment Report. Vol. 1, 2004.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990. New York: Basii Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Zenginobuz, Ünal. “A Growth-Oriented Tax Policy for Turkey.” Paper presented at the The Turkish Enlargement Business Council of the European Round Table of Industrialists, İstanbul 2005.Google Scholar
Zenginobuz, Ünal, Gökhan, Özertan, Ismail Sağlam, , and Gökşen, Fatoş. Yurttaşların Cebinden Devletin Kasasına: Türkiye'de Kim Ne Kadar Vergi Ödüyor? İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Research Papers, ISS/EC 2006-18, 2006.Google Scholar