Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:37:34.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fruitless Attempts? The Kurdish Initiative and Containment of the Kurdish Movement in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Marlies Casier ,
Joost Jongerden  and
Nic Walker
Marlies Casier
Affiliation:
Middle East and North Africa Research Group, Centre for Third World Studies, Ghent University, Universiteitsstraat 8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, [email protected].
Joost Jongerden
Affiliation:
Critical Technology Construction, Social Sciences Group, Wageningen University, CTC-WUR Bode 164, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, the Netherlands, [email protected].
Nic Walker
Affiliation:
Independent Researcher, 27 Rye Close, London SE4, U.K., [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following the victory of the Kurdish party DTP (Demokratik Toplum Partisi, Democratic Society Party) in Turkey's southeastern provinces in the local elections of March 2009, Turkey witnessed the AKP (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, Justice and Development Party) government's Kurdish initiative, the closure of the victorious Kurdish party, and waves of arrests of Kurdish activists and politicians. This rush of action constituted a renewed effort to contain and roll back the political and societal influence of the Kurdish movement. But what is it exactly that the government and the state were attempting to contain, and why? This article considers the recent moves of the ruling AKP, the judiciary, and the Turkish Armed Forces in regard to the “Kurdish problem” in Turkey's southeast, interpreting them as different responses to the regional success of the Kurdish movement.

Keywords

Turkey's Kurdish questionKurdish Democratic InitiativePKK/Kurdistan Workers’ PartyBDP/Freedom and Democracy PartyKCK/Union of Communities in KurdistanAKP/Justice and Development Party
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 44 , Spring 2011 , pp. 103 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akkaya, Ahmet Hamdi, and Jongerden, Joost. “The PKK in the 2000s: Continuity through breaks?” In Nationalisms and Politics in Turkey: Political Islam, Kemalism and the Kurdish Issue, edited by Casier, Marlies and Jongerden, Joost, 143-62. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Aslan, Senem. “Incoherent State: The Controversy over Kurdish Naming in Turkey.” European Journal of Turkish Studies, no. 10 (2009), http://ejts.revues.org/index4142.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydınlı, Ersel. “Decoding Turkey's Struggle with the PKK.” Security Dialogue, no. 33 (2002): 209-25.Google Scholar
Bal, Ihsan. “The Intraparty Clash of Pro-Kurdish DTP.” USAK articles-analyses (2009), http://www.usak.org.tr/EN/makale.asp?id=964.Google Scholar
Bal, Ihsan. “The Kurdish Issue: Today and Its Future. The Democratic Initiative and the DTP's Capacity to Use This Channel.” USAK articles-analyses (2010), http://www.usak.org.tr/EN/makale.asp?id=1288.Google Scholar
Bali, Aslı Ü. “Unpacking Turkey's ‘Court-Packing’ Referendum.” Middle East Report Online (2010), http://www.merip.org/mero/mero110510.html.Google Scholar
Barkey, Henry, and Graham Fuller, E.Turkey's Kurdish Question. New York: Rowman Littlefield Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
Casier, Marlies. “Contesting the ‘Truth’ of Turkey's Human Rights Situation: State-Associations interactions in and outside the Southeast.” European Journal of Turkish Studies, no. 10 (2009), http://ejts.revues.org/index4190.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casier, Marlies, Hilton, Andy, and Jongerden, Joost. ““Road Maps” and Roadblocks in Turkey's Southeast.” Middle East Report Online (2009), http://www.merip.org/mero/mero103009.html.Google Scholar
Cizre, Ümit. “Demythologizing the national security concept: the case of Turkey.” Middle East Journal 57, no. 2 (2003): 213-29.Google Scholar
Cizre, Ümit. “The Emergence of the ‘Government's Perspective’ on the Kurdish issue.” Insight Turkey 11, no. 2 (2009): 1–12.Google Scholar
Çandar, Cengiz. “The Kurdish Question: The Reasons and Fortunes of the ‘Opening’.” Insight Turkey 11, no. 2 (2009): 13-9.Google Scholar
Çarkoğlu, Ali. “Turkey's Local Elections of 2009: Winners and Losers.” Insight Turkey 11, no. 2 (2009): 1–18.Google Scholar
Çınar, Menderes. “Turkey's Present ancien régime and the Justice and Development Party.” In Nationalisms and Politics in Turkey: Political Islam, Kemalism and the Kurdish Issue, edited by Casier, Marlies and Jongerden, Joost, 13–27. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Doğan, Yonca Poyraz, and Yavuz, Ercan. “Erdoğan makes emotional appeal for unity on Kurdish initiative.” Today's Zaman, August 12, 2009, http://www.todayszaman.com/news-183728-erdogan-makes-emotional-appeal-for-unity-on-kurdish-initiative.html.Google Scholar
“DTP'de Hedef 100 Belediye.” Aktüel Bakış, http://www.aktuelbakis.com/Politika/6656.html.Google Scholar
Duran, Burhanettin. “Approaching the Kurdish Question via adil düzen: An Islamist Formula of the Welfare Party for Ethnic Coexistence.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, no. 18 (1998): 111-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grojean, Olivier. “La production de l'Homme nouveau au sein du PKK.” European Journal of Turkish Studies, no. 8 (Thematic Issue ‘Surveiller, normaliser, réprimer’) (2008), http://ejts.revues.org/index2753.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heper, Metin. The State and the Kurds in Turkey. The Question of Assimilation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
“İller, Gümrükler ve Türkiye Geneli Halkoylaması Geçici Sonuçları, Anayasa Değişikliklerinin Halkoyuna Sunulması.” Yüksek Seçim Kurulu Başkanlığı, http://www.ysk.gov.tr/ysk/ReferandumSecimSonucServ?bilmece1=zgyf2j.Google Scholar
Imset, İsmet G.The PKK. A Report on Separatist Violence in Turkey (1973–1992): Turkish Daily News Publications, 1992.Google Scholar
Jongerden, Joost. “Crafting Space, Making People: The Spatial Design of Nation in Modern Turkey.” European Journal of Turkish Studies, no. 10 (2009), http://ejts.revues.org/index4014.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongerden, Joost. “Dams and Politics in Turkey: Utilizing Water, Developing Conflict.” Middle East Policy 17, no. 1 (2010): 137-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongerden, Joost. The Settlement Issue in Turkey and the Kurds. An Analysis of Spatial Policies, Modernity and War. Leiden: Brill, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongerden, Joost, and Akkaya, Ahmet Hamdi. “Born from the Left: The making of the PKK.” In Nationalisms and Politics in Turkey: Political Islam, Kemalism and the Kurdish Issue, edited by Casier, Marlies and Jongerden, Joost, SAYFA SAYISI !!! London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Karasu, Mustafa. Radikal Demokrasi. Neuss: Weşanân Mezopotamya, 2009.Google Scholar
“Koma Komalen Kürdistan Sözleşmesi.” Wesanên Serxwebun, 2005.Google Scholar
Marcus, Aliza. “Troubles in Turkey's Backyard.” Foreign Policy (2010), http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/07/09/troubles_in_turkey_s_backyard.Google Scholar
Navaro-Yashin, Yael. Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton, NJ: Princton University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oran, Baskın. “The Minority Report Affair in Turkey.” Regent Journal of International Law 5 (2007), http://baskinoran.com/makale/Minorityreportaffair-RegentJournal.pdf.Google Scholar
“Ovada Siyasetin Bedeli: 6 Parti Kapatma ve Binlerce Tutuklu Siyasetçi.” Günlük, February 2, 2011, http://www.gunlukgazetesi.net/haber.asp?haberlD=6261&haberBaslik=Ovada%2osiyasetin%2obedeli:%206%20parti%20kapatma%20ve%20binlerce%20tutuklu%20Siyaset%C3%A7İ&action=haber_detay&module=nuce.Google Scholar
Öktem, Kerem. “The patronising embrace: Turkey's new Kurdish strategy.” (2008), http://www.sfst.ch/typo3/fileadmin/user_upload/dateien/OP_Oktem_08-02.pdf.Google Scholar
Özok-Gündoğan, Nilay. “‘Social Development’ as a Governmental Strategy in the Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP).” Unpublished MA Thesis, Boğaziçi University, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, David. The Kurdish Nationalist Movement: Opportunity, Mobilization and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalbert-Yücel, Clémence. “The Invention of a Tradition: Diyarbakir's Dengbêj Project.” European Journal of Turkish Studies, no. 10 (2009), http://ejts.revues.org/index4055.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Seçim 2009.” NTV, http://secim2009.ntvmsnbc.com/default.htm.Google Scholar
Tezcür, Güneş M. “When democratization radicalizes.” Journal of Peace Research, no. 47 (2010): 775-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. Contention and democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. Cambridg Turkish Statistical Institute. “Local government elections.” http://www.tuik.gov.tr/secimdagitimapp/yerel.zul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Nicole F. “Activists in Office: Pro-Kurdish Contentious Politics in Turkey.” Ethnopolitics, no. 5 (2006): 125-44.Google Scholar
Watts, Nicole F.. “The Missing Moderate: Legitimacy Resources and pro-Kurdish Party Politics in Turkey.” In The Kurdish Policy Imperative, edited by Lowe, Richard and Stansfield, Gareth. London: Chatham House, 2010.Google Scholar
Watts, Nicole F.. “Re-considering State-Society Dynamics in Turkey's Kurdish Southeast.” European Journal of Turkish Studies, no. 10 (2009), http://ejts.revues.org/index4196.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeğen, Mesut. “The Kurdish Question in Turkey.” In Nationalisms and Politics in Turkey: Political Islam, Kemalism and the Kurdish Issue, edited by Casier, Marlies and Jongerden, Joost, 67–84. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar