Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T19:11:57.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The fragile growth regime of Turkey in the post-2001 period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

Hansjörg Herr  and
Zeynep M. Sonat
Hansjörg Herr*
Affiliation:
Berlin School of Economics and Law, Germany
Zeynep M. Sonat*
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin and Berlin School of Economics and Law, Germany
*
[email protected].
[email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After the 2001 crisis, Turkey continued to pursue the radical market-oriented reform strategy that had started in the early 1980s and followed the philosophy of the Washington Consensus. Gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the post-2001 period was relatively high, but it was a “jobless” growth caused by substantial productivity increases generated largely by intensifying the work process rather than by technological advancements. Economic growth in the post-2001 period benefited society very unequally. The growth regime of Turkey is vulnerable owing to high current account deficit; high currency mismatch, particularly in the corporate sector; high income inequality; high unemployment; and an unsatisfactory development of the industrial sector, despite some successes. We recommend a new development regime with selective capital controls, a balanced current account, an active industrial policy by the government, stronger trade unions and employers’ associations engaged in social dialogue combined with coordinated wage bargaining on the sectoral level, and last but not least, redistributive policies aiming to achieve a more equal income distribution.

Keywords

Turkeygrowth regimemonetary policyinternational capital flowsfinancial systemE12E42E61F34O11O53
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 51 , Fall 2014 , pp. 35 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alp, Harun, and Elekdağ, Selim. The Role of Monetary Policy in Turkey During the Global Financial Crisis. Working Paper No. 11/10. Ankara: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, 2011.Google Scholar
AMECO. “Annual Macro-Economic Database of the European Commission’s Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN).” 2014.Google Scholar
Aydıner-Avşar, Nursel, and Onaran, Ozlem. “The Determinant of Employment: A Sectoral Analysis for Turkey.” The Developing Economies 48, no. 2 (2010): 203-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bağdadioğlu, Enis. “İşler’2013.” Türkiye İşçi Sendikalari Konfederasyonu Yayın Organı. July 2012–July 2013, no: 399 (2013): 68–73.Google Scholar
Berument, Hakan, and Malatyalı, Kamuran. “Determinants of Interest Rates in Turkey.” Russian and East European Finance and Trade 37, no. 1 (2001): 5–16.Google Scholar
BRSA. Bankacılıkta Yapısal Gelişmeler. Vol. 6, Ankara: Bankacılık Düzenleme ve Denetleme Kurumu, 2012.Google Scholar
Çakar, Vesile. “Yabancı Sermayeli Banka Girişleri Ve Ulusal Bankacılık Sektörleri Üzerindeki Etkileri.” CBRT thesis, CBRT, 2003.Google Scholar
Calvo, Guillermo A., and Mishkin, Frederic S.. “The Mirage of Exchange Rate Regimes for Emerging Market Countries.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17, no. 4 (2003): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, Jose E., and Root, Hilton L.. The Key to the Asian Miracle. Making Shared Growth Credible. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Inst., 1996.Google Scholar
CBRT. “Annual CPI and Targets.” Ankara: CBRT, 2014.Google Scholar
CBRT. “Balance of Payments - Yearly Analytic Presentation (1975–2013).” Ankara: CBRT, 2014.Google Scholar
CBRT. “Electronic Data Delivery System.” Ankara: CBRT, 2014.Google Scholar
CBRT. Financial Stability Report. Vol. 5, Ankara: CBRT, 2007.Google Scholar
CBRT. Financial Stability Report. Vol. 9, Ankara: CBRT, 2009.Google Scholar
CBRT. Financial Stability Report. Vol. 15, Ankara: CBRT, 2012.Google Scholar
CBRT. Financial Stability Report. Vol. 17, Ankara: CBRT, 2013.Google Scholar
CBRT. Inflation Report 2006 - IV. Ankara: CBRT, 2006.Google Scholar
CBRT. Inflation Report 2007 - IV. Ankara: CBRT, 2007.Google Scholar
CBRT. Inflation Report 2008 - IV. Ankara: CBRT, 2008.Google Scholar
CBRT. Inflation Report 2011 - IV. Ankara: CBRT, 2011.Google Scholar
CBRT. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policy for 2009. Ankara: CBRT, 2008.Google Scholar
CBRT. Monetary Policy Report. Ankara: CBRT, 2002.Google Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon. “Globalization, Transnational Corporations, and Economic Development: Can the Developing Countries Pursue Strategic Industrial Policy in Globalizing World Economy.” in Globalization and Progressive Economic Policy, edited by Baker, D., Epstein, G., and Pollin, R., 97–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenery, Hollis B., and Strout, Alan M.. “Foreign Assistance and Economic Development.” The American Economic Review LVI, no. 4, Part I (1966).Google Scholar
Crone, Donald K. “States, Elites, and Social Welfare in Southeast Asia.” World Development 21, no. 1 (1993): 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detzer, Daniel, and Herr, Hansjörg. Theories of Financial Crises: An Overview. Working Paper Series No. 32. Institute for International Political Economy (IPE) Berlin, Berlin School of Economics and Law, 2014.Google Scholar
DPB. “İstatistikler.” Ankara: DPB, 2014.Google Scholar
Dullien, Sebastian, Herr, Hansjörg, and Kellermann, Christian. Decent Capitalism. London: Pluto, 2011.Google Scholar
Easterly, William. “The Ghost of Financing Gap.” Journal of Development Economics 60, no. 2 (1999): 423-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertuğrul, Ahmet, and Selçuk, Faruk. “A Brief Account of the Turkish Economy, 1980–2000.” Russian and East European Finance and Trade 37, no. 6 (2001): 6–30.Google Scholar
Eurofound, . “Capacity Building for Social Dialogue at Sectoral and Company Level: Turkey.”. Eurofound, 2007.Google Scholar
Eurostat, . “Statistics.” Luxembourg: Statistical Office of the European Union, 2014.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. “Transferable Lessons? Re-Examining the Institutional Prerequisites of East Asian Economic Policies”. In East Asian Development: New Perspectives, edited by Akyüz, Yılmaz, 66–86. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
Fischer, Stanley, Sahay, Ratna, and Végh, Carlos A.. “Modern Hyper- and High Inflations.” Journal of Economic Literature 40, no. 3 (2002): 837-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, Rainer. “Güler Sabanci: Die Anatolische Superfrau.” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, January 18, 2011.Google Scholar
Herr, Hansjörg. “Credit Expansion and Development – a Schumpeterian and Keynesian View of the Chinese Miracle.” Intervention. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 7, no. 1 (2010): 71–89.Google Scholar
Herr, Hansjörg. “The Labour Market in a Keynesian Economic Regime: Theoretical Debate and Empirical Findings.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33, no. 5 (2009): 949-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herr, Hansjörg, and Kazandziska, Milka. Macroeconomic Policy Regimes in Western Industrial Countries. London: Routledge, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herr, Hansjörg, and Priewe, Jan. “Beyond the »Washington Consensus«: Macroeconomic Policies for Development”. International Politics and Society 2/2005 (2005): 72–97.Google Scholar
HM. “Statistics.” 2014.Google Scholar
Ho, Corrinne, and McCauley, Robert N.. “Living with Flexible Exchange Rates: Issues and Recent Experience in Inflation Targeting Emerging Market Economies,” In “BIS Working Papers,” 130, (2003).Google Scholar
IMF. “International Financial Statistics.” IMF, 2013.Google Scholar
IMF. Turkey: 2011 Article IV Consultation – Staff Report; Staff Supplements; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Turkey. IMF Country Report, No. 12/16. IMF, 2012.Google Scholar
IMF. Turkey: Staff Report for the 2010 Article IV Consultation and Post – Program Monitoring – Supplementary Information; Staff Report; Informational Annex; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion. Country Report No. 10/278. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 2010.Google Scholar
Independent Social Scientists Alliance. 2005 Başında Türkiye’nin Ekonomik Ve Siyasal Yaşamı Üzerine Değerlendirmeler. Ankara: Türk Mühendis ve Mimar Odaları Birliği /TMMOB, 2005.Google Scholar
Independent Social Scientists Alliance. 2008 Kavşağında Türkiye: Siyaset, İktisat Ve Toplum. İstanbul: Yordam Kitap, 2008.Google Scholar
Kannan, Prakash. Perspectives on High Real Interest Rates in Turkey. IMF Working Paper Series. Vol. 08/251: IMF, 2008.Google Scholar
Kara, Hakan. Monetary Policy in Turkey after the Global Crisis. Working Papers No: 12/17. Ankara: Research and Monetary Policy Department, CBRT, 2012.Google Scholar
Kara, Hakan, and Öğünç, Fethi. Döviz Kuru ve İthalat Fiyatlarının Enflasyona Etkisi. Research Notes in Economics, Sayı 2011–14. Ankara: Research and Monetary Policy Department, CBRT, 2011.Google Scholar
Kara, Hakan, and Öğünç, Fethi. Exchange Rate Pass-through in Turkey: It Is Slow, but Is It Really Low? Working Papers No: 05/10. Ankara: Research and Monetary Policy Department, CBRT, 2005.Google Scholar
Kasman, Saadet, and Ayhan, Duygu. “Macroeconomic Volatility under Alternative Exchange Rate Regimes in Turkey.” Central Bank Review, CBRT 6, no. 2 (2006): 37–58.Google Scholar
KB. “Economic and Social Indicators.” 2012.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1936.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. Treatise on Money, Vol. 1: The Pure Theory of Money. London: MacMillan, Collected Writings, Vol. V, 1930.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. “Dutch Tulips and Emerging Markets.” Foreign Affairs 74, no. 4 (1995): 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutlay, Mustafa. “Internationalization of Finance Capital in Spain and Turkey: Neoliberal Globalization and the Political Economy of State Policies.” New Perspectives on Turkey 47, Fall (2012): 115-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MB. “Statistics.” 2014.Google Scholar
Minsky, Hyman P.John Maynard Keynes. New York: Columbia University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. Growing Unequal: Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar
OECD. OECD Economic Surveys: Turkey. Vol. 2006, Issue 15: OECD, 2006.Google Scholar
OECD. OECD Economic Surveys: Turkey. Vol. 2008, Issue 14: OECD, 2008.Google Scholar
OECD. OECD Economic Surveys: Turkey. Vol. 2010, Issue 13: OECD, 2010.Google Scholar
OECD. “Statistics.” OECD, 2014.Google Scholar
Official Gazette No. 24460. “Kamu Görevlileri Sendikalari Ve Toplu Sözlesme Kanunu, Kanun Numarası: 4688, Madde 29.” Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Labor and Social Security, 2001.Google Scholar
Official Gazette No. 28460. “Sendikalar Ve Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kanunu, Kanun Numarası: 6356, Madde 34.” Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Labor and Social Security, 2012.Google Scholar
ÖİB. “Privatization Implementations between 1985–2008.” 2008.Google Scholar
Öniş, Ziya, and Şenses, Fikret. Global Dynamics, Domestic Coalitions and a Reactive State: Major Policy Shifts in Post-War Turkish Economic Development. Discussion Paper 2007/7. Turkish Economic Association, 2007.Google Scholar
Öniş, Ziya, and Bayram, İsmail Emre. “Temporary Star or Emerging Tiger? Turkey’s Recent Economic Performance in A Global Setting.” New Perspectives on Turkey 39, Fall (2008): 47–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özatay, Fatih. “Merkez Bankası’nın Yeni Para Politikası: İki Hedef – Üç Ara Hedef – Üç Araç.” İktisat, İşletme ve Finans 26, no. 302 (2011): 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“A Promising Start. But Turkey’s Economy Still Has a Lot to Catch up On.” The Economist, May 17, 2005.Google Scholar
Roberts, Nina. “House Hunting In … Turkey.” The New York Times, August 22, 2012.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan. “The Economics of Hyperinflation. Besprechung Des Gleichnamigen Buches Von Bresciani-Turroni, C.” The Economic Journal 48, no. 191 (1938): 507-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. “Industrial Policy: Don’t Ask Why, Ask How.” Middle East Development Journal, Demo Issue 2008 (2008): 1–29.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. “The Turkish Economy after the Crisis.” Ekonomi-tek 1, no. 1 (2009): 41–61.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. “Who Needs Capital-Account Convertibility?”. In Should the IMF Pursue Capital Account Convertibility?, edited by Fischer, Stanley, 55–65. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Department of Economics, International Finance Section, 1998.Google Scholar
Şenses, Fikret. “Turkey’s Experience with Neoliberal Policies since 1980 in Retrospect and Prospect.” New Perspectives on Turkey 47, Fall (2012): 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sönmez, Mustafa. 100 Soruda Küresel Kriz Ve Türkiye. İstanbul: Yeni Alan Yayıncılık, 2009.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. “Capital-Market Liberalization, Globalization, and the IMF.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20, no. 1 (2004): 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E.. “Some Lessons from the East Asian Miracle.” World Bank Research Observer 11, no. 2 (1996): 151-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Uy, Marilou. “Financial Markets, Public Policy, and the East Asian Miracle.” World Bank Research Observer 11, no. 2 (1996): 249-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taymaz, Erol, and Voyvoda, Ebru. “Marching to the Beat of a Late Drummer: Turkey’s Experience of Neoliberal Industrialization since 1980.” New Perspectives on Turkey 47, Fall (2012): 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TBB, “Türkiye’de Bankacılık Sistemi. Banka Bazında Seçilmiş Konsolide Tablolar. Aralık 2012.” in İstatistiki Raporlar, 1-42. Report Code: DT21, 2013.Google Scholar
TBB. “Türkiye’de Yabancı Bankalar.” Bankacılar March 2005, no. 52 (2005).Google Scholar
Telli, Çağatay, Voyvoda, Ebru, and Yeldan, A. Erinç. “A General Equilibrium Assessment of Twin-Targeting in Turkey.” in Beyond Inflation Targeting. Assessing the Impacts and Policy Alternatives, edited by Epstein, Gerald A. and Yeldan, A. Erinç, 203–226. United Kingdom (UK): Edward Elgar, 2006.Google Scholar
Turkstat. “Gelir Ve Yasam Kosullari Arastirmasi, 2011, Sayı: 10902.” Ankara: Turkstat, 2012.Google Scholar
Turkstat. Household Labour Force Statistics 2011. Ankara: Turkstat, 2012.Google Scholar
Turkstat. Income and Living Conditions Survey 2009. Ankara: Turkstat, 2012.Google Scholar
Turkstat. “Income and Living Conditions Survey 2011.” Ankara: Turkstat, 2013.Google Scholar
Turkstat. “Statistics.” Ankara: Turkstat, 2014.Google Scholar
Turkstat. “Yoksulluk Çalışması, 2010,” in Haber Bülteni, no. 8642 (2012).Google Scholar
Uçkan, Banu. “Social Dialogue(Less) between Social Partners in Turkey: Dialogue Falling on Deaf Ears.” in Industrial Relations in Europe Conference (IREC). June 23-25, 2008. Greenwich, UK, 2008. 1–17.Google Scholar
Visser, Jelle. “Data Base on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts, 1960–2010 (ICTWSS).” Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies AIAS. University of Amsterdam, 2011.Google Scholar
Volkan, Ara, Saatçioğlu, Cem, and Korap, Levent. Impact of Exchange Rate Changes on Domestic Inflation: The Turkish Experience. Working Papers No. 2007/6. Turkish Economic Association, 2007.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. Curbing the Boom-Bust Cycle: Stabilizing Capital Flows to Emerging Markets. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics, 2005.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. “What Washington Consensus Means by Policy Reform.” in Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened, edited by Williamson, J., 7–40. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 1990.Google Scholar
World Bank. Turkey: Labour Market Study. Vol. 1, Report No. 33254: World Bank, 2006.Google Scholar
World Bank. “World Development Indicators.” World Bank, 2014.Google Scholar
Yeldan, A. Erinç. Macroeconomics of Growth and Employment: The Case of Turkey. Employment Working Paper No. 108. Geneva: International Labour Organization, 2011.Google Scholar
Yeldan, A. Erinç. Patterns of Adjustment under the Age of Finance: The Case of Turkey as a Peripheral Agent of Neoliberal Globalization. Working Papers Number 126. Amherst: Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 2007.Google Scholar
Yeldan, A. Erinç. “Turkey and the Long Decade with the IMF: 1998–2008.” in News Analysis, 1–5. International Development Economics Associates, 2008.Google Scholar