Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:59:57.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Covering Disasters, Natural or Otherwise: Media, Politics, and the Public Sphere in Post-Earthquake Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

George Gavrilis
George Gavrilis*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Columbia University, New York City
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 17 August 2000, the somber first anniversary of the Marmara earthquake, the mainstream Turkish media found a sole reason for celebration. Alongside lengthy reports of vigils in remembrance of the dead and protests of the state's anemic relief efforts, the media celebrated its partnership with civil society and all but declared an end to a state that was at once heavy-handed and ineffectual. Amplifying this theme, an article that compiled a list of the earthquake's “winners” and “losers” placed the media and civil society in the former category and a host of state agencies charged with disaster response in the latter one. Hürriyet, a high-circulation mainstream newspaper, described this praise as well deserved, stating that journalists had effectively “exposed all the naked truths” of the state's inability to provide for its population.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 24 , Spring 2001 , pp. 141 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aksoy, A., and Robins, K.. 1997. “Peripheral Vision: Cultural Industries and Cultural Identities in Turkey,” Environment and Planning, A, 29, pp. 1937-52.Google Scholar
Alpay, Şahin. 1993. “Journalists: Cautious Democrats,” pp. 70–88 in Turkey and the West: Changing Political and Cultural Identities, ed. Heper, Metin, Öncü, Ayşe, and Kramer, Heinz. London: I.B. Tauris and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Arat, Yeşim. 1991. “Social Change and the 1983 Governing Elite in Turkey,” in Structural Change in Turkish Society, ed. Kıray, Mübeccel. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University, Turkish Studies Publications.Google Scholar
Aytekin, Atilla E. 2000. “Deprem, toplum, kamusal ve bir mücadele alanı olarak devlet,” Birikim 130, pp. 66–71.Google Scholar
Bagdikian, Ben H. 1992. The Media Monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bozdoğan, Sibel. 1998. “The Predicament of Modernism in Turkish Architectural Culture: An Overview,” pp. 133-56 in Rethinking Modernity and Identity in Turkey, ed. Kasaba, Reşat and Bozdoğan, Sibel. Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Bucy, Erik P., and D'Angelo, Paul. 1999. “The Crisis of Political Communication: Normative Critiques of News and Democratic Processes,” Communication Yearbook 22, pp. 301-39.Google Scholar
Dalhgren, Peter. 1992. “Introduction,” pp. 1–23 in Journalism and Popular Culture, ed. Dahlgren, Peter and Sparks, Colin. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Edwards, Bob, and Foley, Michael W.. 1998. “Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and Social Capital in Comparative Perspective,” American Behavioral Scientist 42 (1), pp. 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm,” Journal of Communication 43 (4), pp. 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan, Mustafa. 1999. “Islam in Turkish Politics: Turkey’s Quest for Democracy without Islam,” Critique: Journal for Critical Studies of the Middle East 15, pp. 25–49.Google Scholar
Finkel, Andrew. 2000. “Who Guards the Turkish Press? A Perspective on Press Corruption in Turkey,” Journal of International Affairs 54 (1), pp. 147-66.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Göle, Nilüfer. 2000. “Snapshots of Islamic Modernities,” Daedalus 129 (1), pp. 91–117.Google Scholar
Heper, Metin. 1997. “Islam and Democracy in Turkey: Toward a Reconciliation?” Middle East Journal 51(1), pp. 32–45.Google Scholar
Kasaba, Resat, and Bozdoğan, Sibel. 2000. “Turkey at a Crossroad,” Journal of International Affairs 54 (1), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Kasaba, Reşat, and Bozdoğan, Sibel, eds. 1998. Rethinking Modernity and Identity in Turkey. Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Koru, Fehri. 1999. “The First Casualty Is the State,” Turkish Daily News (24 August).Google Scholar
Oliver, Pamela E., and Myers, Daniel J.. 1999. “How Events Enter the Public Sphere: Conflict, Location, and Sponsorship in Local Newspaper Coverage of Public Events,” American Journal of Sociology 105 (1), pp. 38–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özbek, Meral. 1998. “Arabesk Culture: A Case of Modernization and Popular Identity,” pp. 211-32 in Rethinking Modernity and Identity in Turkey, ed. Kasaba, Reşat and Bozdoğan, Sibel. Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. 2000. Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Marcella Ridlen. 1999. ‘Technological Change and Associational Life,” in Civic Engagement in American Democracy, ed. Skocpol, Theda and Fiorina, Morris P.. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Piers. 1999. “The CNN Effect: Can the News Media Drive Foreign Policy?” Review of International Studies 25, pp. 301-9.Google Scholar
Saktanber, Ayğe. 1997. “Formation of a Middle-Class Ethos and Its Quotidian: Revitalizing Islam in Modern Turkey,” pp. 140-56 in Space, Culture and Power: New Identities in Globalizing Cities, ed. Öncü, and Weyland, . London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Savvides, Philippos K. 1999. “Aftershocks in the Turkish State,” Politis (12 September).Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael. 1997. “Why Conversation Is Not the Soul of Democracy,” Critical Studies in Media Communication 14 (4), pp. 297–309.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael 1995. The Power of News. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schwedler, Jillian. 1995. “Introduction,” pp. 1–18 in Toward Civil Society in the Middle East? ed. Schwedler, J.. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack, and Ballentine, Karen. 1996. “Nationalism and the Marketplace of Ideas,” International Security 21, pp. 5–40.Google Scholar
Toprak, Binnaz. 1996. “Civil Society in Turkey,” pp. 87–118 in Civil Society in the Middle East, vol. 2, ed. Norton, A.R.. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
White, Jenny B. 1999. “Amplifying Trust: Community and Communication in Turkey,” pp. 162-79 in New Media in the Muslim World: The Emerging Public Sphere, ed. Eickelman, Dale and Anderson, Jon W.. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Yavuz, M. Hakan. 1999a. “Media Identities for Alevis and Kurds in Turkey,” pp. 180-99 in New Media in the Muslim World, ed. Eickelman, D. and Anderson, J.. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Yavuz, M. Hakan 1999b. “Search for a New Social Contract in Turkey: Fethullah Gülen, the Virtue Party and the Kurds,” SAIS Review 19 (1), pp. 114-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yumul, Arus, and Özkirimli, Umut. 2000. “Reproducing the Nation: ‘Banal Nationalism’ in the Turkish Press,” Media Culture and Society 22 (6), pp. 787–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarefsky, David. 1992. “Spectator Politics and the Revival of Public Argument,” Communication Monographs 59, pp. 411-14.Google Scholar