Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:33:39.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuity and Change in Social Policy Approaches toward Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Azer Kılıç
Azer Kılıç*
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Sosyal Politika Forumu, 34342, İstanbul, Turkey, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article discusses the development of social policy in Turkey from a gender perspective. Focusing on continuities and changes in the formal social security system and the labor market regulation, it aims to describe the place of women in social policy until today. I argue that social policy measures from the late Ottoman era to the single-party period laid the foundation for later gendered policy approaches through specific assumptions on women's roles and position. With the introduction of a modern social security system in the post-World War II period women have increasingly become integrated into the system, either as workers or as dependents of workers; however, assumptions about women's place in the family and the labor market did not change much. Familial dependency and traditional gender norms were assumed and reinforced through certain gender-differentiated policies, and women workers have been encouraged to go back home. Over the last two decades, however, the conceptualization of women in social policy formulations has shifted towards a policy that encourages female labor and equal treatment of genders.

Keywords

social policyprotective legislationgenderequality/differenceTurkey
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 38: Special Issue on Poverty and Social Exclusion , Spring 2008 , pp. 135 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2008

References

Acar-Savran, Gülnur. “AB'nin Toplumsal Cinsiyet Politikaları,” Birikim, 204 (April 2006): 40–54.Google Scholar
Acar-Savran, Gülnur. Beden, Emek, Tarih: Diyalektik Bir Feminizm İçin. İstanbul: Kanat, 2004.Google Scholar
Acar-Savran, Gülnur. “Sosyal Güvenlik Reformu Karşısında Feminist Politika,” Bianet (4 January 2008).Google Scholar
Acar-Savran, Gülnur. Interview. “Ev İşleri Bütün Bir Hayata Yayılır,” Pazartesi, 112 (February-March 2007): 41–50.Google Scholar
Acuner, Selma. “Avrupa Birliği ve Eşitlik Politikaları: Çetrefil Bir Yol!” Amargi, 2 (Fail 2006): 75–79.Google Scholar
Anonymous. “Pozitif Ayrımcılık Bize Fena Halde Gereklidir…” Petrol-iş Kadın, 9 (June 2004): 4–6.Google Scholar
Arat, Yeşim. “Türkiye’de Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Vatandaşlık.” In 75 Yılda Tebaa'dan Yurttas'a Doğru, edited by Ünsal, Artun, 67–74. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı, 1998.Google Scholar
Arın, Tülay and Ergin, Berin. “Türkiye’de Sosyal Güvence ve Kadınlar: Yasal Çerçeve ve Uygulama.” In Aydınlanmanın Kadınları, edited by Arat, Necla, 212-70. İstanbul: Cumhuriyet Kitapları, 1998.Google Scholar
Bianet, . “Her işyerine Kreş, Erkeklere Doğum izni” (09 April 2003).Google Scholar
Bianet, . “Kadın istihdamı için Talepler: Pozitif Ayrımcılık” (11 December 2007).Google Scholar
Bianet, . “Kadınlar Örgütlenip Haklarını Almalı” (27 August 2007).Google Scholar
Bianet, . “Kadınlar Sosyal Güvenlik Reformuna Karşı Eylem Hazırlığında” (31 December 2007).Google Scholar
Bianet, . “Kreş de Olsa Fon da Kurulsa Hükümetin Kadına Bakışı Aynı,” (15 January 2008).Google Scholar
Bock, Gisela and James, Susan. “Introduction: Contextualizing equality and difference.” In Beyond Equality and Difference: Citizenship, Feminist Politics, and Female Subjectivity, edited by Bock, Gisela and James, Susan, 3–13. London, NY: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Bora, Aksu. Kadınların Sınıfı: Ücretli Ev Emeği ve Kadın Öznelliğinin inşası, İstanbul: İletişim, 2005.Google Scholar
Bruning, Gwennaele and Plantenga, Janneke, “Parental Leave and Equal Opportunities: Experiences in Eight European Countries,” Journal of European Social Policy, 9, 3 (1999): 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. “Poverty and Citizenship: An Overview of the Social Policy Environment in Republican Turkey,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 36 (2007): 27–46.Google Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe and Keyder, Çağlar. “Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation,” Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 3 (2006): 211-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çalışma, ve SosyalBakanlığı, Güvenlik. “Proposal for Reform in the Social Security System,” 29 July 2004. Retrieved in 23 October 2005 online from: <http://www.calisma.gov.tr>.Google Scholar
Çanlı, Mehmet. “Eytam idaresi ve Sandıkları (1851-1926).” In Türkler, 57–73. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, 2002.Google Scholar
Çanlı, Mehmet. “Eytam İdaresi-Sandıkları ve Osmanlı Devletinde Yetimlerin Ekonomik Haklarının Korunması.” In Savas Çocukları: Öksüzler ve Yetimler, edited by Gürsoy-Naskali, Emine and Koç, Aylin, 59–86. İstanbul: (s.n.), 2003.Google Scholar
Ecevit, Yıldız. “Women's Labour and Social Security.” In Bridging the Gender Cap in Turkey: A Milestone towards Faster Socio-economic Development and Poverty Reduction, edited by Acar, Feride. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit: World Bank, 2003.Google Scholar
EU. “Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security”Google Scholar
EU. “Council Directive 86/613/EEC of 11 December 1986 on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity, including agriculture, in a self-employed capacity, and on the protection of self-employed women during pregnancy and motherhood.”Google Scholar
EU. “Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the implementation of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of pregnant workers, women workers who have recently given birth and women who are breastfeeding.”Google Scholar
EU. “Council Directive 96/34/EC of 3 June 1996 on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC.”Google Scholar
EU. “Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions.”Google Scholar
Forestieri, Valentine, “Information Note on Women Workers and Gender Issues on Occupational Safety and Health.” Geneva: International Labor Office, 2000. Available at: <http://www.ilo.org/public/eng-lish/protection/safework/gender/womenwk.htm#N_10_>.Google Scholar
Güzel, Ali, and Okur, Ali Rıza. Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku. 9 ed. İstanbul: Beta, 2003.Google Scholar
İlkkaracan, İpek. “Göç, Kadının Ekonomik Konumu, Hareket Özgürlüğü ve Aile içi Güç Dinamikleri,” İktisat Dergisi, 337 (March 1998): 62–67.Google Scholar
Kala, Eyüp Sabrı. “Osmanlılarda Sosyal Güvenlik – Sosyal Sigortalar, (1865–1923).” MA Thesis, İstanbul University, 1994.Google Scholar
KESK. “Olumlu Eylem ve Güçlendirme Raporu,” 2004. Available at <http://www.kesk.org.tr/in-dex.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=56&ltemid=119>>Google Scholar
Koray, Meryem. Sosyal Politika. Ankara: İmge, 2005.Google Scholar
Kümbetoğlu, Belkıs. Women's Informal Sector Contribution to the Household Survival in Urban Turkey. Ph.D. Dissertation, İstanbul University, 1992.Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola. “The Constitution of Identity: Gender, Feminist Legal Theory, and the Law and Society Movement.” In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, edited by Sarat, Austin, 471-86. Maiden: Blackwell, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jane and Davies, Celia. “Protective Legislation in Britain, 1870-1990: Equality, Difference and Their Implications for Women,” Policy and Politics, 19, 1 (1991): 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makal, Ahmet. Türkiye’de Tek Partili Dönemde Çalışma ilişkileri: 1920-1946. Ankara: İmge, 1999.Google Scholar
Maliye Bakanlığı Bütçe ve Mali Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü. Kamu Personeli Emeklilik Mevzuatı I (1876-1930). Ankara: Maliye Bakanlığı Bütçe ve Mali Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü, 1994.Google Scholar
Maliye Bakanlığı Bütçe ve Mali Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü. Kamu Personeli Emeklilik Mevzuatı II (1930-1950). Ankara, Maliye Bakanlığı Bütçe ve Mali Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü, 1995.Google Scholar
Oktay, Aygül. “İş Yerinde Cinsel Taciz ve istismar,” Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7 (2001): 75–89.Google Scholar
Os, Nicole A. N. M. Van. “Asker Ailelerine Yardım: Osmanlı Devleti ve Muinsiz Aile Maaşı.” In Devletin Silâhlanması: Ortadoğu ve Orta Asya’da Zorunlu Askerlik, 1775-1925, edited by Zürcher, Erik J., 105-21. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2003.Google Scholar
Özbay, Ferhunde (ed). Küresel Pazar Açısından Kadın Emeği ve İstihdamındaki Değişmeler. Türkiye Örneği. İstanbul: İnsan Kaynağını Geliştirme Vakfı, 1998.Google Scholar
Özbek, Nadir. Cumhuriyet Türkiyesi'nde Sosyal Güvenlik ve Sosyal Politikalar, İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı, 2006.Google Scholar
Özbek, Nadir. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nda Sosyal Devlet: Siyaset, iktidarve Meşruiyet, 1876-1914. İstanbul: İletişim, 2004.Google Scholar
Özcan, Tahsin. “Osmanlı Toplumunda Sosyal Güvenlik Üzerine Bazı Gözlemler.” In Osmanlı, 110-15. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye yayınları, 1999.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. “Deconstructing Equality-versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Post-structuralist Theory for Feminism,” Feminist Studies, 14, 1 (Spring 1988): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TBMM. Zabıt Ceridesi, Term 3, Session 3, vol. 20, 1930.Google Scholar
TBMM. Zabıt Ceridesi, Term 7, Session 2, vol. 18, 1945.Google Scholar
TBMM. Zabıt Ceridesi, Term 8, Session 3, vol. 19, 1949.Google Scholar
TBMM. Zabıt Ceridesi, Term 8, Session 3, vol. 20, 1949.Google Scholar
TBMM. Tutanak Dergisi, Term 4, Session 2, vol. 13, 1975.Google Scholar
TBMM. Tutanak Dergisi, Term 17, Legislation Year 2, vol. 14, 1985.Google Scholar
TBMM. Genel Kurul Tutanağı, Term 19, Legislation Year 5, 13 November 1995. Available at: <http.7/wvrtv.tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa/tutanak_ss.birlesim_baslangic?P4=549&P5=T&web_user_i d=3507868&PAG E1=1 &.PAG E2=54>..>Google Scholar
TBMM. Tutanak Dergisi, Term 22, Legislation Year 1, vol. 24, 2003.Google Scholar
TBMM. Tutanak Dergisi, Term 22, Legislation Year 2, vol. 57, 2004.Google Scholar
TBMM. “Devlet Memurları Kanunu ve iş Kanununda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun Tasarısı ve Avrupa Birliği Uyum; Sağlık, Aile, Çalışma ve Sosyal işler ile Plan ve Bütçe Komisyonları Raporları (1948),” in Tutanak Dergisi, Term 22, Legislation Year 3, Order no. 834, 2005. Available at: <http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/sirasayi/donem22/yil01/ss834m.htm>..>Google Scholar
TBMM. Tutanak Dergisi, Term 22, Legislation Year 4, vol. 117, 2006.Google Scholar
TBMM. Tutanak Dergisi, Term 22, Legislation Year 4, vol. 121, 2006.Google Scholar
TBMM. “Plan ve Bütçe Komisyonu Raporu,” Esas no: 1/1008, 1/8, 1/14, 1/408, 1/568, 1/571, 1/574, 2/79, 2/151, 2/152, 2/156, 2/196, 2/208, 2/301, 2/313, 2/322, 2/335, 2/423, 2/459, 2/558, 2/593, 2/654, Decision no.: 83, 6 April 2006. Available at: <http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/sirasayi/do-nem22/yil01/ssll39m.htm>..>Google Scholar
Toksöz, Gülay and Erdoğdu, Seyhan. Sendikacı Kadın Kimliği. Ankara: İmge, 1998.Google Scholar
Toprak, Zafer. “Sosyal Politika Tarihimizin ilk Önlemler Paketi: Müessesat-ı Sınaiyyede Çocukların ve Kadınların Çalıştırılması (1910).” Toplum ve Bilim 27 (Fail 1984): 229-37.Google Scholar
Türk-İş, . “Türkiye'de Emek Piyasasında Kadınların Durumu,” 2005. Available at <http://www.tur-kis.org.tr/icerik/avparkadin.dooGoogle Scholar
UNDP. Human Development Report 1995: Gender and Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Yazıcı, Berna. Social Work and the Politics of the Family at the Crossroads of Welfare Reform in Turkey. Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University, 2007.Google Scholar
Yücel, Yelda. “2000'li Yıllarda Ekonomi ve Kadınlar Cephesinde Görünüm,” Pazartesi, 112 (February-March 2007): 70–73.Google Scholar
Zırhlı, Fatma Şenden. Sosyal Cüvenlik ve Kadın, İstanbul: Minerva, 2000.Google Scholar