Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:51:58.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Claiming a Place Through Memories of Belonging: Politics of Recognition on the Island of Imbros1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Elif Babül
Elif Babül*
Affiliation:
Cultural and Social Anthropology, Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The establishment of the Turkish Republic in 1923 marks the official construction of a new community and new forms of belonging that were expected to replace the communities and forms of belonging characteristic of the Ottoman Empire. The convention signed at the end of the First World War on January 30, 1923, concerning “the compulsory exchange of Turkish nationals of the Greek Orthodox Religion established in Turkish territory, and of Greek nationals of the Muslim religion established in Greek territory” can be seen as the hallmark of this republican attempt to create a new homogenized republican community called the nation. Exchanging populations meant the mutual exclusion of the largest ethnic and religious minority groups from the post-World War I nationalized lands of Greece and Turkey.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 34: Special Issue on Social Memory , Spring 2006 , pp. 47 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper is a rethinking of my master's thesis in the light of the papers I delivered at two workshops, the workshop on “Politics of Remembering,” organized by Boğaziçi University's Sociology Department in April 2003, and the “Conference on Diaspora and Memory,” organized by the Amsterdam School of Cultural Analysis in March 2003. This paper is a revised version of an article to appear in a book compiled by ASCA from the presentations given at the “Conference on Diaspora and Memory.” The source material is mainly composed of the narratives of belonging of informants whom I interviewed in Imbros during my field research conducted in intervals between August 2001 and 2002. The research overall examines the regulation of the legitimate way of belonging to a place within national borders and addresses the larger issues of citizenship, governmentality, and sovereignty in republican Turkey. In this paper, however, I limit myself to one aspect of my general argument and look at the workings of Rum memories of belonging to Imbros and their diasporic articulations to make claims to, and be recognized on, the island. See A. Hoffmann, “Diasporic Articulations” (paper presented at the ASCA Conference on Diaspora and Memory, Amsterdam, March 26-28 2003). All the names of my informants cited in this paper are pseudonyms.

References

Akar, Rıdvan, and Demir, Hülya. İstanbul'un Son Sürgünleri: 1964'te Rumların Sınırdısı Edilmesi, İstanbul: İletişim, 1994.Google Scholar
Aktar, Ayhan. “Homogenizing the Nation, Turkifying the Economy: The Turkish Experience of the Population Exchange Reconsidered.” In Crossing Aegean: An Appraisal of the 1923 Compulsory Population Exchange between Greece and Turkey, edited by Hirschon, Renee, 79–96. New York: Berghahn Books, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandris, Alexis. The Greek Minority of Istanbul and Greek-Turkish Relations 1918–1974. Athens: Centre for Asia Minor Studies, 1992.Google Scholar
Alexandris, Alexis, “Imbros and Tenedos: A Study of Turkish Attitudes toward Two Ethnic Greek Island Communities since 1923.” Journal of the Hellenic Diaspora 7, no. 1 (1980): 5–31.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minesota: University of Minesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Birtek, Faruk. “Greek Bull in the China Shop of Ottoman Grand Illusion.” In Citizenship and the Nation-State in Greece and Turkey, edited by Birtek, Faruk and Dragonas, Thalia, 37–49. London: Routledge, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozbeyoğlu, Alanur Cavlin. “Differentiation in the Demographic Structure of Gökçeada since 1923.” Unpublished Master Thesis, Hacettepe University, 2001.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius. The Imaginary Institution of Society. London: Polity Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Clogg, Richard. Anatolica: Studies in the Greek East in the 18th and 19th Centuries. London: Variorum, 1996.Google Scholar
Clogg, Richard, “The Greek Diaspora: The Historical Context.” In The Greek Diaspora in the Twentieth Century, edited by Clogg, Richard, 1–23. New York: Macmillan, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortier, Anne Marie. Migrant Belongings: Memory, Space and Identity. Oxford: Berg, 2000.Google Scholar
Hirschon, Renee. Heirs of the Greek Catastrophe: The Social Life of Asia Minor Refugees in Piraeus. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hirschon, Renee, “‘Unmixing’ Peoples in the Aegean Region.” In Crossing the Aegean: An Appraisal of the 1923 Compulsory Population Exchange between Greece and Turkey, edited by Hirschon, Renee, 3–13. New York: Berghahn Books, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, A. “Diasporic Articulations.” Paper presented at the ASCA Conference on Diaspora and Memory, Amsterdam, March 26-28 2003.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. Feminist Theory from Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Karakasidou, Anastasia. Fields of Wheat, Hills of Blood: Passages to Nationhood in Greek Macedonia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oran, Baskın. “The Story of Those Who Stayed: Lessons from Articles 1 and 2 of the 1923 Convention.” In Crossing the Aegean: An Appraisal of the 1923 Compulsory Population Exchange between Greece and Turkey, edited by Hirschon, Renee, 97–117. New York: Berghahn Books, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oran, Baskın, Türk-Yunan İlişkilerinde Batı Trakya Sorunu. Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi, 1991.Google Scholar
Papataxiarchis, Evthmios. “The Turkish “Other” in 20th C. Creek Academic Discourse: “Asia Minor Refugee” and “Muslim Minority” Studies in Greece.” Paper presented at the A Turkish Greek Dialogue: Setting the Problem Areas and Searching for Solutions, Boğaziçi University, istanbul, May 26-27 2003.Google Scholar
Parla, Taha. Ziya Gökalp, Kemalizm ve Türkiye'de Korporatizm. İstanbul: İletişim, 1989.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Renato. Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston: Beacon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Safran, William. “Diasporas in Modem Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return.” Diaspora 1, no. 1 (Spring 1991): 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tekeli, İlhan. “Involuntary Displacement and the Problem of Displacement in Turkey from the Ottoman Empire to the Present.” In Population, Displacement and Resettlement: Development and Conflict in the Middle East, edited by Shami, Seteney. New York: Center for Migration Studies, 1994.Google Scholar
Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Boston: Beacon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Tsimouris, Georgios. “Reconstructing “Home” among the “Enemy”: The Greeks of Gökseada (Imvros) after Lausanne.” Balkanologie 5, no. 1-2 (2001): 257–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkan, Vamık, and Itzkowitz, Norman. Türkler ve Yunanlılar Çatışan Komşular, İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık, 2002.Google Scholar