Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:43:54.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Art and Power in Turkey: Culture, Aesthetics and Nationalism During the Single Party Era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Duygu Köksal
Duygu Köksal*
Affiliation:
The Atatürk Institute for Modern Turkish, History, Boğaziçi University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One prominent intellectual of the early Turkish Republic, İsmail Hakkı Baltacıoğlu, argued that the new Republic should be “a Republic of fine arts.” Indeed, the early Republican project in Turkey perceived culture and art as media through which the Republic could not only represent its achievements but also “create” itself. The present study focuses on the cultural policies and elite perceptions of culture during the single-party regime in Turkey. More specifically, it looks into the developments that took place in the plastic arts and in elite approaches towards aesthetics. This is done in order to shed light on young Turkey's cultural modernization. Examining the interaction between aesthetics and power, this discussion stands at the intersection of political studies and cultural history.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 31 , Fall 2004 , pp. 91 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ades, Dawn. “Paris 1937, Art and the Power of Nations.” In Art and Power, Europe under the Dictators 1930-45, edited by Ades, Dawnet al.London: Hayward Gallery, 1996.Google Scholar
Aksel, Malik. “Sanatta Güzellik Mevhumu.” Ülkü 7, no. 38 (1936).Google Scholar
Aksel, Malik. “Yirmi Yıllık Sanat Hareketleri.” Ülkü 5, no. 51 (new series) (1943).Google Scholar
Aktar, Ayhan. Varlık Vergisi ve Türkleştirme Politikaları, İstanbul: iletişim, 2000.Google Scholar
Akurgal, Ekrem. “Ortaçağ Devri Türk Sanatı.” Ülkü 1, no. 8 (new series) (1942).Google Scholar
Akurgal, Ekrem. “İslamiyet Devri Türk Sanatı.” Ülkü 12, no. 67 (1938).Google Scholar
Akurgal, Ekrem. “İslamiyet Devri Türk Sanatı.” Ülkü 12, no. 68 (1938).Google Scholar
Ali, Necip. “Halkevleri Yıldönümü Nutku.” Ülkü 3, no. 13 (1934).Google Scholar
Asaf, Burhan. “Niçin Sanatsızız.” Kadro, no. 13 (1932).Google Scholar
Asaf, Burhan. “Sanat Hakkında Düşünceler.” Varlık, 1, no. 16 (1934).Google Scholar
Asaf, Burhan. “Sanatın Salamurası Karşısında.” Kadro, no. 17 (1933).Google Scholar
Asaf, Burhan. “Sovyet Sergisi.” Ulus, no. 20 İlkkanun (1934).Google Scholar
Bali, Rıfat. Cumhuriyet Yıllarında Türkiye Yahudileri, Bir Türkleştirme Serüveni (1923-1945). İstanbul: İletişim, 2000.Google Scholar
Baltacıoğlu, İsmail Hakkı. “Güzel Sanatlar Cumhuriyeti.” Yeni Adam, no. 3 (1934).Google Scholar
Ben-Ghiat, Ruth. Fascist Modernities, Italy 1922-1945. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Berk, Nurullah. “Dördüncü inkılap Resim Sergisi.” Ari, no. 1 (1937).Google Scholar
Berk, Nurullah. “Kübizm Nedir?” Varlık 2, no. 39 (1935).Google Scholar
Berk, Nurullah. “Modern Sanat.” Varlık 2, no. 37 (1935).Google Scholar
Berk, Nurullah. “Sanat ve Devlet.” Ar 1, no. 12 (1938).Google Scholar
Berk, Nurullah Cemal. “Kübizm Nedir?” Varlık 2, no. 38 (1935).Google Scholar
Berk, Nurullah Cemal. “Modern Sanat.” Varlık 2, no. 36 (1935).Google Scholar
Berman, Russell A. “German Primitivism/Primitive Germany, the Case of Emil Nolde.” In Fascism, Aesthetics and Culture, edited by Golsan, Richard J.. Hanover and London: University Press of New England, 1992.Google Scholar
Bozdoğan, Sibel. Modernism and Nation Building, Turkish Architectural Culture in the Early Republic. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Browne, Matthew Cullerne. Socialist Realist Painting. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dasenbrock, Reed Way. “Paul de Man: The Modernist as Fascist.” In Fascism, Aesthetics and Culture, edited by Golsan, Richard. Hanoverand London: University Press of New England, 1992.Google Scholar
Elliot, David. “The Battle for Art.” In Art and Power, Europe under the Dictators 1930-45, edited by Ades, Dawnet al.London: Hayward Gallery, 1996.Google Scholar
Epikman, Refik. “Türk Plastik Sanat Hayatına Toplu Bir Bakış.” Ülkü 13, no. 78 (1939).Google Scholar
Epikman, Refik. “Türkiye'de Resim ve Heykel Sergileri.” Ülkü 15, no. 86 (1940).Google Scholar
Erol, Turan. Cünümüz Türk Resminin Oluşum Sürecinde Bedri Rahmi Eyüboğlu. İstanbul: Cem, 1984.Google Scholar
Ersanlı, Büşra. İktidar ve Tarih: Türkiye'de Resmi Tarih Tezinin Oluşumu (1929-1937). İstanbul: Afa, 1992.Google Scholar
Ertem, Sadri. “İnkılapçı Sanat, Geri Sanat,.” Varlık 1, no. 4 (1933).Google Scholar
Eyüboğlu, Bedri Rahmi. “3. Devlet Resim ve Heykel Sergisi.” Ülkü 1, no. 5 (new series) (1941).Google Scholar
Falasca-Zamponi, Simonetta. Fascist Spectacle: The Aesthetics of Power in Mussolini's Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güven, Ferid Celal. “Halkevleri ve Güzel Sanatlar.” Ülkü 13 (new series), no. 73 (1938).Google Scholar
Hewitt, Andrew. Fascist Modernities: Aesthetics, Politics, and the Avant-garde. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadıoğlu, Ayşe. “The Paradox of Turkish Nationalism.” Middle Eastern Studies 32, no. 2 (1996): 134-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Yakup Kadri. “Ankara, Moskova, Roma.” Kadro, no. 6 (1932).Google Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Yakup Kadri. “Bir Kıssa ve Bir Hisse.” Kadro, no. 14 (1933).Google Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Yakup Kadri. “Edebiyat Buhranına Dair.” Kadro, no. 8 (1932).Google Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Yakup Kadri. “Enderun Şairleri ve Halk Edebiyatı.” Kadro, no. 10 (1932).Google Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Yakup Kadri. “Eski Yeni.” Kadro, no. 12 (1932).Google Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Yakup Kadri. “Haile Unsuru.” Kadro, no. 4 (1932).Google Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Yakup Kadri. “Kültür ve Medeniyet.” Kadro, no. 15 (1933).Google Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Yakup Kadri. “Maksim Gorki ile Mülakat.” Kadro, no. 5 (1932).Google Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Yakup Kadri. “Moskova Edebiyat Konferansında.” Kadro, no. 33 (1934).Google Scholar
Karaömerlioğlu, Asım. “The People's Houses and the Cult of Peasantism in Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 34, no. 4 (1998): 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemal, Behçet. “Gönüllü Sanat.” Ülkü 4, no. 23 (1935).Google Scholar
Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. “Sanat Hakkında (Opening speech for the 1935 exhibition of the D group).” Varlık, no. 52 (1935).Google Scholar
Koçak, Cemil. Türkiye'de Milli Şef Dönemi, 1938-45. Ankara: Yurt Yayınları, 1986.Google Scholar
Landau, Jacob. Pan-Turkism in Turkey: From Irredentism to Cooperation. London: Hurst & Co, 1995.Google Scholar
Moore, Clement Henry. “The Single Party As Source of Legitimacy.” In Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society, The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems, edited by Huntington, Samuel P. and Moore, Clement Henry. New York, London: Methuen Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Mosse, George L.Masses and Man: Nationalist and Fascist Perceptions of Reality. New York: H. Fertig, 1980.Google Scholar
Nabi, Yaşar. “Hümanizma ve Milli Ruh.” Varlık 11, no. 163 (1940).Google Scholar
Nabi, Yaşar. “Sanatta ihtisaslaşma Cereyanı.” Varlık 4, no. 83 (15 İlkkanun) (1936).Google Scholar
Naci, Elif. “Resim ve Felsefe.” Varlık 1, no. 3 (1933).Google Scholar
Nayır, Yaşar Nabi. “Ahlak Savaşı.” Varlık 12, no. 214 (1942).Google Scholar
Oktay, Ahmet. Türkiye'de Toplumcu Gerçekçiliğin Kaynaklan. Ankara: BFS, 1987.Google Scholar
Ongun, Cemil Sena. “Bedii Kıymetlerde Anarşi.” Varlık 13, no. 216 (1942).Google Scholar
Ongun, Cemil Sena. “Gençlik Meselesi.” Varlık 13, no. 226 (1942).Google Scholar
Ongun, Cemil Sena. “Harbin Mahiyet ve Felsefesi.” Varlık 11, no. 178 (1940).Google Scholar
Ongun, Cemil Sena. “Harp ve Ahlak.” Varlık 12, no. 203 (1941).Google Scholar
Ongun, Cemil Sena. “Millet ve Ahlak.” Varlık 13, no. 219 (1942).Google Scholar
Ongun, Cemil Sena. “Sanat Felsefesi.” Varlık 2, no. 40 (1935).Google Scholar
Ongun, Cemil Sena. “Türk Ahlakının Sosyal ve Kişisel Prensipleri.” Varlık 13, no. 234 (1943).Google Scholar
Owen, Roger. State, Power and Politics in the Making of the Modern Middle East. 2 ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. “Established Revolution vs. Unfinished Revolution: Contrasting Patterns of Democratization in Mexico and in Turkey.” In Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society, The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems, edited by Huntington, Samuel P. and Moore, Clement Henry, 380–405. New York, London: Methuen Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. “The Nature of the Kemalist Political Regime.” In Atatürk, The Founder of a Modern State, edited by Kazancıgil, Ali and Ozbudun, Ergun. London: C. Hurst & Co., 1981.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, Günay Göksu. Turan'dan Bozkurt'a: Tek Parti Döneminde Türkçülük (1931-1946). İstanbul: İletişim, 2001.Google Scholar
Özsezgin, Kaya. Cumhuriyetin 75. Yılında Türk Resmi. Ankara: Türkiye iş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 1998.Google Scholar
Parla, Taha. Türkiye'de Siyasal Kültürün Resmi Kaynaklan, Cilt 3, Kemalist Tek Parti İdeolojisi ve CHP'nin Altı Oku. İstanbul: İletişim, 1995.Google Scholar
Peker, Recep. “Hukuk Fakültesi'nde inkılap Dersleri.” Hakimlyet-i Milliye (1934).Google Scholar
Rıfkı, Falih. “Faşizm Havası (Roma, Tiran, Atina).” Hakimiyet-i Milliye (1931).Google Scholar
Rıfkı, Falih. “Moskova, Roma.” Hakimiyet-i Milliye (1932).Google Scholar
Rıfkı, Falih. Moskova, Roma. Ankara: Muallim Ahmet Halit Kitabevi, 1932.Google Scholar
Rıfkı, Falih. “Toprak (Roma, Tiran, Atina).” Hakimiyet-i Milliye (1931).Google Scholar
Sami, Ali. “Propaganda ve Resim.” Ülkü 4, no. 19 (1934).Google Scholar
Schnapp, Jeffrey. “Epic Demonstrations: Fascist Modernity and the 1932 Exhibition of the Fascist Revolution.” In Fascism, Aesthetics and Culture, edited by Golsan, Richard J.. Hanover and London: University Press of New England, 1992.Google Scholar
Sırrı, Nahid. “Ankara'daki Resim ve Heykel Sergisi.” Ülkü 9, no. 53 (1937).Google Scholar
Suman, Nusret. “Resim Sergisi Dolayısıyla.” Ülkü 2, no. 13 (new series).Google Scholar
Süreyya, Şevket. “Ziya Cökalp.” Kadro, no. 2 (1932).Google Scholar
Süreyya, Şevket. “Benerci Kendini Niçin Öldürdü?” Kadro, no. 4 (1932).Google Scholar
Tansuğ, Sezer. Çağdaş Türk Sanatı, İstanbul: Remzi, 1991.Google Scholar
Tokin, M. Füruzan. “Türk Rönesansı.” Varlık 11, no. 169 (1940).Google Scholar
Tonguç, İsmail Hakkı. “Sovyet Sanatkarları Resim Sergisi.” Ülkü 4, no. 24 (1935).Google Scholar
Tunçay, Mete.T.C.'nde Tek Parti Yönetiminin Kurulması (1923-1931). Ankara: Yurt Yayınlan, 1981.Google Scholar
“Varlık Ne İçin Çıkıyor?” Varlık 1, no. 1 (1933).Google Scholar
Vicdani, Malik. “Türk Resim Sanatı.” Varlık 1, no. 2 (1933).Google Scholar
Ziya, Mimar Aptullah. “İnkılap ve Sanat.” Varlık 1, no. 5 (1933).Google Scholar
Zürcher, Erik J.Turkey: A Modern History. London, New York: I. B. Tauris, St. Martin's Press, 1998.Google Scholar