Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:40:27.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Policy Change in Countries without Mature Welfare States: The Case of Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Ayşe Buğra  and
Sinem Adar
Ayşe Buğra
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi University, Bebek, İstanbul, Turkey, [email protected]
Sinem Adar
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As part of the institutional changes in Turkey since the 1980s that laid down the foundations of a market economy, the transformation of the social security system has recently come on the agenda. This article discusses the possible outcome of this transformation by situating the case of Turkey in the context of the contemporary international social policy environment shaped by neo-liberal globalization.

It is possible to suggest that throughout the world a new system of welfare governance has recently emerged, which is characterized, first, by a novel emphasis on workfare as opposed to welfare. It modifies, second, redistributive action by the state through diverse partnerships between the state, private sector and voluntary initiatives in the provision of social care and public services. The impact of this new system of welfare governance on social policy is especially important in less developed countries where the role of the state in welfare provision is recently being taken more seriously. With the new emphasis on workfare accompanied by the increasing role of non-state actors, the newly introduced social policy measures might not necessarily consolidate the basis of citizenship rights but they might mainly serve to keep under control the socio-economic insecurity aggravated by the expansion of market relations. This observation is of particular significance for the analysis of the contemporary social policy environment in Turkey that this article presents.

Keywords

social policywelfare statesTurkeypovertysocial spending
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 38: Special Issue on Poverty and Social Exclusion , Spring 2008 , pp. 83 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrientos, Armando. “Latin America: Towards a Liberal-Informal Welfare Regime.” In Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America, edited by Cough, Ian and Wood, Ceof, 121–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Bode, Ingo. “Disorganized Welfare Mixes: Voluntary Agencies and New Governance Regimes in Western Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 16, no. 4 (2006): 346–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. “АKР Döneminde Sosyal Politika ve Vatandaşlık.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 108 (2007): 143–167.Google Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. “Immoral Economy of Housing in Turkey.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22, no. 2 (1998): 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. “Kriz Karşısında Türkiye'nin Geleneksel Refah Rejimi.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 89 (2001): 22–30.Google Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. “Poverty and Citizenship: An Overview of the Social-Policy Environment in Republican Turkey.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 39, no. 1 (2007): 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe, and Adar, Sinem. An Analysis of Social Protection Expenditures in Turkey in a Comparative Perspective. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Social Policy Forum Working Paper, 2007.Google Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe, and Keyder, Çağlar. “Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation.” Journal of European Social Policy 16, no. 3 (2006): 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buvinic, Mayra, Mazza, Jacqueline, and Deutsch, Ruthanne., eds. Social Inclusion and Economic Development in Latin America: Inter-American Development Bank, 2004.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G. “On the Political Economy of Recent Public Sector Development.” Journal of European Social Policy 11, no. 3 (2001): 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandhoke, Neera. “Governance and Pluralisation of the State: Implications for Democratic Practices in Asia?” Paper presented at the International Conference Governance in Asia: Culture, Ethnic, Institutional Reform, and Policy Change, City University of Hong Kong, 5-7 December 2002.Google Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon. “The Role of Social Policy in Economic Development: Some Theoretical Reflections and Lessons from East Asia.” In Social Policy in a Development Context, edited by Mkandawire, Thandika, 246–261. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çelik, Aziz. “Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararı ve Sosyal Korumanın Geleceği.” Birgün, 15-17 January 2007.Google Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio. “The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in Social Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 6, no. 1 (1996): 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, Ian. “Welfare Regimes in Development Contexts: A Global and Regional Analysis.” In Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America, edited by Gough, Ian and Wood, Geof, 15–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Gökkuşağı Altındaki Tüm Engeller Aşılacak.” Milliyet, 6 March 2006.Google Scholar
Gray, Anne. Unsocial Europe. London: Pluto Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hibou, Béatrice. “From Privatising the Economy to Privatising the State: An Analysis of the Continual Formation of the State.” In Privatising the State, edited by Hibou, Béatrice, 1–47. London: Hurst & Company, 2004.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne. “Options for Social Policy in Latin America: Neoliberal versus Social Democratic Models.” In Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies, edited by Esping-Andersen, Gosta, 141–190. London: Sage, 1996.Google Scholar
ILO “Global Employment Trends 2007.” http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/strat/downlo-ad/getb07en.pdf.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. “The Changing Governance of Welfare: Recent Trends in Primary Functions, Scale, and Models of Coordination.” Social Policy and Administration 33, no. 4 (1999): 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Huck-Ju. “East Asia and the Developmentalist Welfare State.” Development and Change 36, no. 3 (2005): 477–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD “OECD Policy Note: Poverty Alleviation.” Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs.” https://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/59/38120467.pdf.Google Scholar
“Özel Okul Yaptırmak Eğitime Yüzde 300 Destektir.” Zaman, 19 April 2005.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics Ai, no. 2 (1996): 143–179.Google Scholar
Pınarcıoğlu, M. Melih, and Işık, Oğuz. Nöbetleşe Yoksulluk: Gecekondulaşma ve Kent Yoksulları, Sultanbeyli Örneği İstanbul: İletişim, 2001.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
T. C. Sosyal Guvenlik Kurumu “Sosyal Sigortalar ve Genel Saglik Sigortası Kanunu.” http://www.sgk.gov.tr/doc/sosyalsigvegensagsigkanunu.doc.Google Scholar
T. C. Sosyal Guvenlik Kurumu “SGK istatistik Bülteni.” http://www.calisma.gov.tr/basinbulte-ni/20O6_bulten/bulten20O6.htm.Google Scholar
TBMM Büyüksehir Belediyesi Kanunu, 2005.Google Scholar
TBMM “İl Özel İdaresi Kanunu.” http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/kanunlar/k5302.html.Google Scholar
Tendier, Judith. “Why Social Policy is Condemned to a Residual Category of Safety Nets and What to Do About It?” In Social Policy in a Development Context, edited by Mkandawire, Thandika, 119–142. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Geof. “Informal Security Regimes: The Strength of Relationships.” In Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America, edited by Gough, Ian and Wood, Geof, 49–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
World Bank World Development Report 1999/2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar