Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:06:56.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Shaping of Party Preferences in Turkey: Coping with the Post-Cold War Era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Ersin Kalaycıoğlu
Ersin Kalaycıoğlu*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Boğaziçi University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An overview of general elections and the party system from the beginning of multi-party politics in Turkey would indicate a proclivity towards an increasing number of major parties coupled with fragmentation of the party system. The predominant party system of the 1950s favored stability over representativeness (see Table 1). The 1961 Constitution established new electoral rules and a liberal political regime, which provided for more opportunity for representativeness. The 1965 and 1969 elections produced party governments, with a proportional representation formula that wasted almost no votes; even those parties with the smallest number of followers won some seats in the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TGNA) (see Table 1). For a while in the 1960s Turkey therefore appeared to have discovered the optimal ground of converging stable governments with consummate representativeness. The party governments of the 1960s, however, gave way to the unstable coalition governments of the 1970s, which coincided with a wave of terror and political instability. Coalition governments came to be equated with political instability and terror in the minds of not only the masses, but also the most powerful political forces in the country.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 20 , Spring 1999 , pp. 47 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadan-Unat, N. 1986. Women in the Developing World: Evidence from Turkey. Denver, Colorado: Graduate School of International Studies, University of Denver.Google Scholar
Arat, Y. 1989. The Patriarchal Paradox: Women Politicians in Turkey. Rutherford, Madison, Taeneck: Farleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
Barkey, Henri J. and Graham, E. F. 1998. Turkey's Kurdish Question. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Beck, Paul A. 1993. “A Socialization Theory of Partisan Realignment,” in Niemi, Richard G. and Weisberg, Herbert F. (eds.) Classics in Voting Behavior. Washington D. C.: CQ Press: 331-45.Google Scholar
Çarkoglu, A. 1998. “The Turkish Party System in Transition: Party Performance and Agenda Transformation,” Political Studies, XLVI: 544-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erder, N., Sezgin, T., Kardam, A., Kardam, F. 1995. Türkiye'de Siyasi Partilerin Seçmenleri ve Sosyal Demokrasinin Toplumsal Tabanı. Ankara, Cem Ofset.Google Scholar
Ergüder, Ü. 1980-1981. “Changing Patterns of Electoral behavior in Turkey,” Boğaziçi University Journal: Social Sciences, vol. 8-9: 45–69.Google Scholar
Ergüder, Ü. 1988. “The 1983 General Elections in Turkey: Continuity and Change in Voting Patterns,” in Heper, M. and Evin, A. (eds.) State, Democracy and the Military in Turkey in the 1980s. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 81–102.Google Scholar
Esmer, Y. 1995. “Parties and the Electorate: A Comparative Analysis of Voter Profiles of Turkish Political Parties,” in Ç., Balimet. al. (eds.) Turkey: Political, Social and Economie Challenges in the 1990s. Leiden, New York, Köln: E. J. Brill: 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinderink, J., and Mübeccel, C. 1970. Social Stratification as an Obstacle to Development: A Study of Four Turkish Villages. New York, Washington, London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hürriyet, April 27, 1999 (http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/sondakika.htm).Google Scholar
Kalaycioglu, E. 1983. Karşılaştırmalı Siyasal Katılma: Siyasal Eylemin Kökenleri Üzerine bir inceleme, Istanbul, Istanbul University Publications.Google Scholar
Kalaycıoğlu, E. and A. Y., Sarıbay 1991. “İlkokul Çocuklarının Parti Tutmasını Belirleyen Etkenler,” Toplum ve Ekonomi, no.1: 137-49.Google Scholar
Kalaycıoğlu, E. 1994. “Elections and Party Preferences in Turkey: Changes and Continuities in the 1990s,” Comparative Political Studies, 27: 3, 402–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalaycıoğlu, E. 1997. “Constitutional Viability and Political Institutions in Turkish Democracy.” in Baaklini, Abdo I. and Desfosses, Helen eds., Designs for Democratic Stability: Studies in Viable Constitutionalism. Armonk, N. Y. and London, England: M. E. Sharpe, 179–210.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, D. 1983. Political Science and Political Behavior. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kirişçi, K. and Winrow, , 1997. The Kurdish Question and Turkey: An Example of a Trans-state Ethnic Conflict. London, Portland, OR: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Mardin, Ş. 1975. “Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics,” in Engin D., Akarlı and Ben-Dor, G. eds., Political Participation in Turkey: Historical Background and Present Problems. Istanbul, Boğaziçi University Publications, 7–32.Google Scholar
Özbudun, E. 1976. Social Change and Political Participation in Turkey. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics 1997. Yearbook: 1996. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics Publications.Google Scholar
Tachau, F. 1984. Turkey: The Politics of Authority, Democracy, and Development. New York, Philadelphia: Praeger.Google Scholar
Yalman, N. 1973. “Some Observations on Secularism in Islam: The Cultural Revolution in Turkey,” Daedalus, 102, pp. 139–167.Google Scholar