Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T17:06:07.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ottoman institution of petitioning when the sultan no longer reigned: a view from post-1908 Ottoman Palestine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2017

Yuval Ben-Bassat
Yuval Ben-Bassat*
Affiliation:
Department of Middle Eastern History, University of Haifa, 3498838, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Young Turk Revolution of 1908 helped transform the time-honored Ottoman petitioning system. The reinstatement of parliamentary life, the reintroduction of the suspended constitution of 1876, and the lifting of the ban on the press and political action all generated profound political and social changes. Subjects’ petitions reflected these changes vividly and in often surprising detail. As the sultan became a figurehead with little actual power, petitions which hitherto had been addressed to the sultan either directly or through the grand vizier and had requested his benevolence and mercy, while also granting him much needed legitimacy, now began to be sent instead to the Council of State (Şura-yı Devlet), the parliament, and various government ministries. Their content changed as well, as will be shown in this article through an analysis of dozens of petitions from Ottoman Palestine. Petitions now sought to obtain political rights and ensure civil equity and constitutional rights. In focusing on rights, the rule of law, and the deficiencies of the former system, the petitions echoed changes in popular discourse and mirrored the transformation from justice as a sultanic prerogative to constitutional and civil law.

Keywords

Grand vizierOttoman constitutionOttoman ministriesOttoman PalestineOttoman parliamentOttoman petitionsYoung Turk Revolution.
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 56 , May 2017 , pp. 87 - 103
Copyright
© New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Primary SourcesGoogle Scholar
Prime Ministry Ottoman ArchivesGoogle Scholar
( Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi , BOA, İstanbul) Google Scholar
BEO (Bâb-ı Âlî Evrak Odası)Google Scholar
DH.EUM.EMN (Dahiliye Nezareti Emniyet-i Umumiye Müdiriyeti Emniyet Şubesi)Google Scholar
DH.H (Dahiliye Nezareti Hukuk)Google Scholar
DH.MKT (Dahiliye Nezareti Mektubi Kalemi)Google Scholar
DH.MUI (Dahiliye Nezareti Muhaberat-ı Umumiye)Google Scholar
DH.ŞFR. (Dahiliye Nezareti Şifre Kalemi)Google Scholar
HR.TO (Hariciye Nezareti Tercüme Odası Evrakı)Google Scholar
I.MBH. (İrade Mabeyn-i Hümayun)Google Scholar
Newspapers Google Scholar
Filastin Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Agmon, Iris. “Recording Procedures and Legal Culture in the Late Ottoman Shariʽa Court of Jaffa, 1865–1890.” Islamic Law and Society 11, no. 3 (2004): 333–377.Google Scholar
Akın, Yiğit. “War, Women, and the State: The Politics of Sacrifice in the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.” Journal of Women’s History 26, no. 3 (2014): 12–35.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James E. “Petitioning the Sultan in Ottoman Egypt.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 75, no. 3 (2012): 499–524.Google Scholar
Ben-Bassat, Yuval. Petitioning the Sultan: Protests and Justice in Late Ottoman Palestine. London: I.B. Tauris, 2013.Google Scholar
Chalcraft, John. “Engaging the State: Peasants and Petitions in Egypt on the Eve of Colonial Rule.” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 37, no. 3 (2005): 303–325.Google Scholar
Darling, Linda T. A History of Social Justice and Political Power in the Middle East: The Circle of Justice from Mesopotamia to Globalization. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Der-Matossian, Bedross. Shattered Dreams of Revolution: From Liberty to Violence in the Late Ottoman Empire. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Doumani, Beshara. Rediscovering Palestine: Merchants and Peasants in Jabal Nablus, 1700–1900. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Faroqhi, Suraiya. “Political Initiatives ‘From the Bottom Up’ in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Ottoman Empire: Some Evidence for Their Existence.” In Coping with the State: Political Conflict and Crime in the Ottoman Empire, 1550–1720. Edited by Suraiya Faroqhi. İstanbul: Isis, 1995. 1–11.Google Scholar
Faroqhi, Suraiya “Political Activity among Ottoman Taxpayers and the Problem of Sultanic Legitimation (1570–1650).” In Coping with the State: Political Conflict and Crime in the Ottoman Empire, 1550–1720. Edited by Suraiya Faroqhi. İstanbul: Isis, 1995. 131–141.Google Scholar
Fishman, Louis. “Understanding the 1911 Ottoman Parliament Debate on Zionism in Light of the Emergence of a ‘Jewish Question’.” In Late Ottoman Palestine: The Period of Young Turk Rule. Edited by Yuval Ben-Bassat, and Eyal Ginio. London and New York: I.B. Tauris, 2011. 103–123.Google Scholar
Gerber, Haim. Ottoman Rule in Jerusalem, 1890–1914. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
Ginio, Eyal. “Coping with the State’s Agents ‘from below’: Petitions, Legal Appeal, and the Sultan’s Justice in Ottoman Legal Practice.” In Popular Protest and Political Participation in the Ottoman Empire: Studies in Honor of Suraiya Faroqhi. Edited by Eleni Gara, M. Erdem Kabadayı, and Christoph K. Neumann. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2011. 41–56.Google Scholar
Hämmerle, Christa. “Requests, Complaints, Demands: Preliminary Thoughts on the Petitioning Letters of Lower-Class Austrian Women, 1865–1918.” In Gender and Politics in the Age of Letter-Writing, 1750–2000 . Edited by Caroline Bland, and Máire Cross. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2004. 115–134.Google Scholar
Khalidi, Rashid. Palestinian Identity: The Construction of Modern National Consciousness. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Landen, R.G. The Emergence of the Modern Middle East. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1970.Google Scholar
Minkov, Anton. Conversions to Islam in the Balkans: Kisve Bahası Petitions and Ottoman Social Life, 1670–1730. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Ӧzok-Gündoğan, Nilay. “A ‘Peripheral’ Approach to the 1908 Revolution in the Ottoman Empire: Land Disputes in Peasant Petitions in Post-Revolution Dıyarbekir.” In Social Relations in Ottoman Diyarbekir, 1870–1915 . Edited by Joost Jongerden, and Jelle Verheij. Leiden: Brill, 2012. 179–216.Google Scholar
Rubin, Avi. “Legal Borrowing and its Impact on Ottoman Legal Culture in the Late Nineteenth Century.” Continuity and Change 22, no. 2 (2007): 279–303.Google Scholar
Ursinus, Michael. Grievance Administration (Şikâyet) in an Ottoman Province: The Kaymakam of Rumelia’s ‘Record Book of Complaints’ of 1781–1783. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Zachs, Fruma and Ben-Bassat, Yuval. “Visibility of Women in Petitions during the Late Ottoman Period.” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 47, no. 4 (2015): 765–781.Google Scholar
Zarinebaf-Shahr, Fariba. “Women, Law, and Imperial Justice in Ottoman İstanbul in the Late Seventeenth Century.” In Women, the Family, and Divorce Laws in Islamic History. Edited by Amira El-Azhary Sonbol. Syracuse and New York: Syracuse University Press, 1996. 81–96.Google Scholar