Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:10:06.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The motherhood wage penalty in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2022

Hayriye Özgül Özkan Değirmenci
Hayriye Özgül Özkan Değirmenci*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Kötekli, Muğla, Turkey Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Women with children, on average, earn lower wages than those who do not have children. This is called the “motherhood wage penalty”. This study provides estimates of the wage penalty for working mothers in Turkey using the Turkish Household Labor Force Survey (HLFS), 2014–2018. The gross wage penalty is 21.3 percent, but it is entirely explained by human capital variables: education, marital status, and potential experience in the pooled cross-section. The bulk of the gross penalty is attributable to the higher educational attainment of the subsample of non-mothers compared to mothers. When the wage-setting mechanisms in the public versus private sectors, and differences in fertility exposure by age cohort conditional on education are accounted for, a clearer picture emerges. Empirical findings indicate that the wage penalty does not exist for mothers employed in the public sector but that there is a 3 percent penalty for mothers working in the private sector, with the highest value being 6.1 percent for university-educated young mothers. In addition, wage losses are higher for the younger age cohort, presumably due to leaves of absence from work for time spent caring for young children, which lead to skill erosion.

Keywords

Motherhood wage penaltydifferences by educationage cohortpublic-private sectorTurkey
Type
Article
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 66 , May 2022 , pp. 35 - 60
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aktuğ, E, Kuzubaş, TU and Torul, O (2021) Heterogeneity in labor income profiles: Evidence from Turkey. Empirical Economics 60, 2557–2587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01848-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, JW, Edin, PA, Sundstrom, M and Broman, SB (1999) Career interruptions and subsequent earnings: A re-examination using Swedish data. Journal of Human Resources 34, 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DJ, Binder, M and Krause, K (2002) The motherhood wage penalty: Which mothers pay it and why? American Economic Review 92 (2), 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320191606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arulampalam, W, Booth, AL and Bryan, ML (2007) Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? Exploring the gender pay gap across the wage distribution. ILR Review 60 (2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390706000201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, GS (1957) The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Becker, GS (1985) Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics 3, 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1086/298075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, FD and Kahn, LM (2003) Understanding international differences in the gender pay gap. Journal of Labor Economics 21 (1), 106–144. https://doi.org/10.1086/344125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, FD and Kahn, LM (2017) The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature 55 (3), 789–865. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20160995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonin, H, Dohmen, T, Falk, A, Huffman, D and Sunde, U (2007) Cross-sectional earnings risk and occupational sorting: The role of risk attitudes. Labour Economics 14 (6), 926–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2007.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budig, MJ and England, P (2001) The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review 66 (2), 204–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budig, MJ, Misra, J and Boeckmann, I (2012) The motherhood penalty in cross-national perspective: The importance of work-family policies and cultural attitudes. Social Politics 19 (2), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buligescu, B, Crombrugghe, DD, Menteşoğlu, G and Montizaan, R (2009) Panel estimates of the wage penalty for maternal leave. Oxford Economic Papers 61 (1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpn042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buurman, M, Delfgaauw, J, Dur, R and Bossche, SVD (2012) Public sector employees: Risk averse and altruistic? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83 (3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A and Postel-Vinay, F (2009) Job security and job protection. Oxford Economic Papers 61 (2), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpn017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correll, S, Stephen, B and In, P (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology 112 (5), 1297–1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/511799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cukrowska-Torzewska, E and Lovasz, A (2020) The role of parenthood in shaping the gender wage gap—a comparative analysis of 26 European countries. Social Science Research 85, 102355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dayıoğlu, M (2000) Labor market participation of women in Turkey. In Acar, F and Güneş-Ayata, A (eds), Gender and Identity Construction: Women in Central Asia, the Caucasus and Turkey. Köln: Brill, 44–73.Google Scholar
Dayıoğlu, M and Kırdar, MG (2010) Determinant of and trends in labor force participation of women in Turkey. State Planning Organization of the Republic of Turkey and World Bank, Welfare and Social Policy Analytical Work Program, Working Paper No. 5, Ankara. Available at https://doi.org/10.1596/27853 (accessed 30 January 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dedeoğlu, S (2012) Equality, protection or discrimination: Gender equality policies in Turkey. Social Politics 19 (2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duvier, C and Narcy, M (2015) The motherhood wage penalty and its determinants: A public-private comparison. Labour 29 (4), 415–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ejrnaes, M and Kunze, A (2013) Work and wage dynamics around childbirth. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 115 (3), 859–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangl, M and Ziefle, A (2009) Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography 46, 341–369. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gash, V (2009) Sacrificing their careers for their families? An analysis of the penalty to motherhood in Europe. Social Indicators Research 93 (3), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9429-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauber, R (2018) Trends in the motherhood wage penalty and fatherhood wage premium for low, middle and high earners. Demography 55, 1663–1680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0712-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greulich, A and Dasre, A (2017) The quality of periodic fertility measures in EU-SILC. Demographic Research 36 (17), 525–556. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, ND and Smith, N (2002) Children and career interruptions: The family gap in Denmark. Economica 69 (276), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0335.00303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gündüz-Hoşgör, A and Smits, J (2008) Variation in labor market participation of married women in Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum 31 (2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2008.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, S and Waldfogel, J (2003) The family gap in pay: Evidence from seven industrialized countries. Research in Labor Economics 22, 369–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9121(03)22012-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (2014) Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. Available at https://fs.hacettepe.edu.tr/hips/dosyalar/Ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rmalar%20-%20raporlar/2013%20tnsa/TDHS_2013_main.report_compressed.pdf (accessed 03 March 2022).Google Scholar
Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (2019) Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. Available at http://fs.hacettepe.edu.tr/hips/dosyalar/Ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rmalar%20-%20raporlar/2018%20TNSA/TDHS2018_mainReport_compressed.pdf (accessed 03 March 2022).Google Scholar
Hirsch, BT (2005) Why do part-time workers earn less? The role of worker and job skills. ILR Review 58 (4), 525–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390505800401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İlkkaracan, İ (2012) Why so few women in the labor market in Turkey? Feminist Economics 18 (1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.649358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İlkkaracan, İ and Selim, R (2007) The gender wage gap in the Turkish labor market. Labour 21 (3), 563–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9914.2007.00378.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Office (ILO) (2018) The Global Wage Report 2018–2019. Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available at https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_650553.pdf (accessed 03 March 2022).Google Scholar
Kaya Bahçe, SA and Memiş, E (2013) Estimating the impact of the 2008–09 economic crisis on working time in Turkey. Feminist Economics 19 (3), 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2013.786182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesment, M and Bavel, JV (2017) The reversal of the gender gap in education, motherhood, and women as main earners in Europe. European Sociological Review 33 (3), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw063.Google Scholar
Kleven, H, Landais, C and Sogaard, JE (2019) Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 11 (4), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180010.Google Scholar
Kongar, E and Memiş, E (2017) Gendered patterns of time use over the life cycle in Turkey. In Connelly, R and Kongar, E (eds), Gender and Time Use in a Global Context. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 373–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtulus, FA (2012) Affirmative action and the occupational advancement of minorities and women during 1973–2003. Industrial Relations 51 (2), 213–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2012.00675.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, S and Rose, E (2000) Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Labour Economics 7 (6), 689–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00020-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, H and Semyonov, M (2014) Gender pay gap and employment sector: Sources of earnings disparities in the United States, 1970–2010. Demography 51 (5), 1597–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0320-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, AR (2011) The effect of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics 24, 1071–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0296-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mincer, J (1974) Schooling, Experience and Earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Mincer, J and Ofek, H (1982) Interrupted work careers: Depreciation and restoration of human capital. Journal of Human Resources 17 (1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mincer, J and Polachek, S (1974) Family investments in human capital: Earning of women. Journal of Political Economy 82 (2), 76–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musick, K, Bea, MD and Gonalons-Pons, P (2020) His and her earnings following parenthood in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom. American Sociological Review 85 (4), 639–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420934430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, HS, Simonsen, M and Verner, M (2004) Does the gap in family-friendly policies drive the family gap? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 106 (4), 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00385.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. The American Economic Review 62 (4), 659–661.Google Scholar
Phipps, S, Burton, P and Latheridge, L (2001) In and out of the labour market: Long-term income consequences of child-related interruptions to women’s paid work. Canadian Journal of Economics 34 (2), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/0008-4085.00081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigle-Rushton, W and Waldfogel, J (2007) Motherhood and women’s earnings in Anglo-American, Continental European, and Nordic countries. Feminist Economics 13 (2), 55–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700601184849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smits, J and Gündüz-Hoşgör, A (2006) Effects of family background characteristics on educational participation in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development 26 (5), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2006.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansel, A (2005) Public-private employment choice, wage differentials, and gender in Turkey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 53 (2), 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1086/425374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunalı, İ (1997) To work or not to work: An examination of female labor force participation in urban Turkey. In Proceedings of the Economic Research Forum’s 5th Annual Conference “Regional Trade, Finance and Labor Markets in Transition”. Beirut: Economic Research Forum, 163–178.Google Scholar
Tunalı, İ, Kırdar, MG and Dayıoğlu, M (2021) Down and up the “U”. A synthetic cohort analysis of female labor force participation in Turkey, 1988–2013, World Development 146, 105609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldfogel, J (1997) The effect of children on women’s wages. American Sociological Review 62 (2), 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, ET, Batchelder, L and Ellwood, DT (2010) The mommy track divides: The impact of childbearing on wages of women of differing skill levels. NBER Working Paper No. 16582. Available at https://www.nber.org/papers/w16582 (accessed 03 March 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Özkan Değirmenci supplementary material

Özkan Değirmenci supplementary material

Download Özkan Değirmenci supplementary material(File)
File 105.2 KB