Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T01:11:10.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management of irregular migration: Syrians in Turkey as paradigm shifters for forced migration studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2016

Nergis Canefe
Nergis Canefe*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the context of the series of civil wars that have struck the Middle East since the 1980s, the politico-economic changes in the post-Soviet geography of Eastern Europe and the Russian states, and the continuous turmoil in those parts of Africa and Asia where access to Turkish soil has been possible, Turkey emerged as a regional hub for receiving continuous flows of forced migration. As suggested by ample evidence in recent work on migration flows into Turkey, many of these “irregular migrants,” “stateless peoples,” or “asylum seekers” eventually become continuously employed under very unstable circumstances, thus fitting into the definition of the “precariat” or precarious proletariat. This paper examines the context within which such pervasive precarity takes root, directly affecting vulnerable groups such as the Syrian forced migrants arriving in Turkey in successive waves. The marked qualities of the Syrian case in terms of social precarity, combined with the degrees of disenfranchisement and economically precarious conditions for survival, indicates an institutionalized paradigm shift in the Turkish state’s management of irregular migration.

Keywords

Precaritystatelessnessforced migrationillegal migrationirregular migrationrefugee regimelabor law.
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 54: Special Issue on Precarious Lives and Syrian Refugees in Turkey , May 2016 , pp. 9 - 32
Copyright
© New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agénor, Pierre-Richard, Nabli, Mustapha K., and Yousef, Tarik M.. “Public Infrastructure and Private Investment in the Middle East and North Africa.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3661 (July 2005).Google Scholar
Akbaş, Hamit. “Türkiye’de İltica ve Sığınma Amaçlı İnsan Hareketlerinin Yasadışı Göç Boyutu.” Kriminoloji 3, no. 1 (2011): 2–21.Google Scholar
Anderson, Bridget. “Migration, Immigration Controls and the Fashioning of Precarious Workers.” Work, Employment and Society 24, no. 2 (2010): 300–317.Google Scholar
Arrighi, Giovanni. “Spatial and Other ‘Fixes’ of Historical Capitalism.” In Global Social Change: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Edited by Christopher Chase-Dunn, and Salvatore J. Babones Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Beinin, Joel. “The Working Class and Peasantry in the Middle East: From Economic Nationalism to Neoliberalism.” Middle East Report 210 (Spring 1999): 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzing, Cynthia, Chu, Hung Manh, and Kara, Orhan. “Entrepreneurs in Turkey: A Factor Analysis of Motivations, Success Factors, and Problems.” Journal of Small Business Management 47, no. 1 (January 2009): 58–91.Google Scholar
Boratav, Korkut. “Inter-Class and Intra-Class Relations of Distribution under ‘Structural Adjustment’: Turkey during the 1980s.” In The Political Economy of Turkey: Debt, Adjustment and Sustainability. Edited by Tosun Arıcanlı, and Dani Rodrik, 199–229. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1990.Google Scholar
Bozkurt, Umut. “Neoliberalism with a Human Face: Making Sense of the Justice and Development Party’s Neoliberal Populism in Turkey.” Science & Society 77, no. 3 (2013): 372–396.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. and Soyaltin, Digdem. “Europeanization in Turkey: Stretching a Concept to its Limits?” KFG Working Paper Series, no. 36. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, February 2012.Google Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. “Labour, Capital, and Religion: Harmony and Conflict among the Constituency of Political Islam in Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 38, no. 2 (2002): 187–204.Google Scholar
Burke, Anthony. “Borderphobias: The Politics of Insecurity Post-9/11.” Borderlands 1, no. 1 (2002). http://www.borderlands.net.au/vol1no1_2002/burke_phobias.html. Accessed January 20, 2016.Google Scholar
Bürgin, Alexander. “European Commission’s Agency Meets Ankara’s Agenda: Why Turkey is Ready for a Readmission Agreement.” Journal of European Public Policy 19, no. 6 (2012): 88–92.Google Scholar
Carroll, Nick. “Non-standard Employment: A Note on Levels, Trends, and Some Implications.” Labour Market Bulletin (1999): 101–121.Google Scholar
Chalfin, Brenda. “Global Customs Regimes and the Traffic in Sovereignty: Enlarging the Anthropology of the State.” Current Anthropology 47, no. 2 (April 2006): 243–276.Google Scholar
Çelik, Aziz. “Yeni İş Yasasının Anlamı.” Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi 48 (September/October 2003). http://www.kristalis.org.tr/aa_dokuman/yeni_is_yasasinin_anlami.pdf. Accessed January 30, 2016.Google Scholar
Demirdirek, Hülya. “New Modes of Capitalist Domination: Transnational Space Between Turkey and Moldova.” The Anthropology of East Europe Review 25, no. 1 (2007): 15–20.Google Scholar
Dereli, Toker. “Flexicurity and Turkey’s New Labor Act: Problems and Prospects.” Işık University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Working Paper Series, no. 2013-03 (2013). http://ilera2012.wharton.upenn.edu/RefereedPapers/DereliToker ILERA.pdf. Accessed January 30, 2016.Google Scholar
Eder, Mine. “Retreating State? Political Economy of Welfare Regime Change in Turkey.” Middle East Law and Governance 2, no. 2 (2010): 152–184.Google Scholar
Elitok, Secil Pacaci and Straubhaar, Thomas. “Turkey: Change from an Emigration to an Immigration and Now to a Transit Migration Country.” Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI) 3, no. 16 (2010).Google Scholar
“Europe Has a Deal with Turkey, But Migrants Will Keep Coming.” The Economist, November 30, 2015. http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21679333-refugees-misery-still-drives-them-leave-europe-has-deal-turkey-migrants-will-keep. Accessed January 30, 2016.Google Scholar
Faundez, Julio, “A View on International Labour Standards, Labour Law and MSEs.” Employment Sector Employment Working Paper 18 (2008). http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/documents/publication/wcms_110485.pdf. Accessed January 30, 2016.Google Scholar
Fumagalli, Andrea and Mezzadra, Sandro, eds. Crisis in the Global Economy: Financial Markets, Social Struggles, and New Political Scenarios. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Glassman, Jim. “Primitive Accumulation, Accumulation by Dispossession, Accumulation by ‘Extra-economic’ Means.” Progress in Human Geography 30, no. 5 (2006): 608–625.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. “Neo-Liberalism as Creative Destruction.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 88, no. 2 (2006): 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintjens, Helen. “‘Like Leaves in the Wind’: Desperately Seeking Asylum in the UK.” Race & Class 48, no. 1 (July 2006): 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyndman, Jennifer and Mountz, Alison. “Another Brick in the Wall? Neo-Refoulement and the Externalization of Asylum by Australia and Europe.” Government and Opposition 43, no. 2 (Spring 2008): 249–269.Google Scholar
İçduygu, Ahmet. “The Politics of International Migratory Regimes: Transit Migration Flows in Turkey.” International Social Science Journal 52, no. 165 (September 2000): 357–367.Google Scholar
İçduygu, Ahmet. Irregular Migration in Turkey. IOM International Organization for Migration, IOM Migration Research Series, No. 12 (February 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İçduygu, Ahmet. “Transit Migration in Turkey: Trends, Patterns and Issues.” European University Institute Research Report 4 (2005).Google Scholar
İçduygu, Ahmet. “EU-ization Matters: Changes in Immigration and Asylum Practises in Turkey.” In The Europeanization of National Policies and Politics of Immigration: Between Autonomy and the European Union. Edited by Thomas Faist, and Andreas Ette. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 201–222.Google Scholar
İçduygu, Ahmet. “Circular Migration in Turkey: An Overview of Past and Present: Some Demo-Economic Implications.” Consortium for Applied Research on International Migration (CARIM) Analytical & Synthetic Notes 10 (2008).Google Scholar
İçduygu, Ahmet. “The Politics of Demography and International Migration: Implications for the EU–Turkey Relationship.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 12, no. 1 (March 2010): 59–71.Google Scholar
İçduygu, Ahmet. “The Irregular Migration Corridor between the EU and Turkey: Is it Possible to Block it with a Readmission Agreement?” EU-US Immigration Systems, European University Institute, 2011/14.Google Scholar
İçduygu, Ahmet. “Syrian Refugees in Turkey: The Long Road Ahead.” Migration Policy Institute (April 2015).Google Scholar
İçduygu, Ahmet and Yükseker, Deniz. “Rethinking Transit Migration in Turkey: Reality and Re‐presentation in the Creation of a Migratory Phenomenon.” Population, Space and Place 18, no. 4 (July/August 2012): 441–456.Google Scholar
Kaya, Ayhan. Islam, Migration and Integration: The Age of Securitization. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Kaya, İbrahim. “Legal Aspects of Irregular Migration in Turkey.” Migration Policy Centre; CARIM-South; CARIM Analytic and Synthetic Notes 73 (2008). Accessed January 30, 2016. http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/10118.Google Scholar
Kayaoğlu, Barın. “Turkey Restricts Academic Research on Syrian Refugees.” Al-Monitor, May 27, 2015. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/05/turkey-syria-government-restricts-academic-research.html#ixzz3yn3ds0eW. Accessed January 30, 2016.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar. Türkiye’de Devlet ve Sınıflar. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1989.Google Scholar
Kirişci, Kemal. “Is Turkey Lifting the Geographical Limitation: The November 1994 Regulation on Asylum in Turkey.” International Journal of Refugee Law 8, no. 3 (1996): 293–318.Google Scholar
Kirişci, Kemal. “The Question of Asylum and Illegal Migration in European Union-Turkish Relations.” Turkish Studies 4, no. 1 (2003): 79–106.Google Scholar
Kirişci, Kemal. “Turkey: A Transformation from Emigration to Immigration.” Migration Policy Institute Profile (November 1, 2003). http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/turkey-transformation-emigration-immigration. Accessed May 7, 2015.Google Scholar
Kirişci, Kemal. “Managing Irregular Migration in Turkey: A Political-Bureaucratic Perspective.” Consortium for Applied Research on International Migration (CARIM) Analytical & Synthetic Notes 61 (2008).Google Scholar
Kirişci, Kemal. “Turkey’s Demonstrative Effect and the Transformation of the Middle East.” Insight Turkey 13, no. 2 (2011): 33–55.Google Scholar
Kliman, Andrew. Reclaiming Marx’s Capital: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Kliman, Andrew. The Failure of Capitalist Production: Underlying Causes of the Great Recession. London: Pluto Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Lagrand, Türkan Ertuna. Immigration Law and Policy: The EU Acquis and Its Impact on the Turkish Legal Order. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2010.Google Scholar
Lazzarato, Maurizio. “Neoliberalism in Action: Inequality, Insecurity and the Reconstitution of the Social.” Theory, Culture & Society 26, no. 6 (November 2009): 109–133.Google Scholar
Lucas, Robert E.B. International Migration and Economic Development: Lessons from Low-Income Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
MacInnes, John. “Spain: Continuity and Change in Precarious Employment.” In Gender and the Contours of Precarious Employment. Edited by Leah F. Vosko, Martha MacDonald, and Iain Campbell, 159–176. New York: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Mango, Andrew. “The Third Turkish Republic.” The World Today 39, no. 1 (January 1983): 30–38.Google Scholar
Marazzi, Christian. The Violence of Financial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Müftüler-Baç, Meltem. “Turkish Foreign Policy, its Domestic Determinants and the Role of the European Union.” South European Society and Politics 16, no. 2 (2011): 279–291.Google Scholar
Neilson, Brett and Rossiter, Ned. “Precarity as a Political Concept, or, Fordism as Exception.” Theory, Culture & Society 25, no. 7–8 (2008): 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. “Bogus Refugees? The Determinants of Asylum Migration to Western Europe.” International Studies Quarterly 49, no. 3 (September 2005): 389–410.Google Scholar
Nykänen, Johanna. “Turkey’s Middle East Policy.” In Hard Choices: The EU’s Options in a Changing Middle East. Edited by Timo Behr, FIIA Report 28, 13–14. Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs, 2011.Google Scholar
Öker, İbrahim. “Reform in Labor Code in Turkey: Changing the Nature of Labor Market?” Centre for Policy and Research on Turkey (Research Turkey) 3, no. 9, (London, ResearchTurkey): 16–43. http://researchturkey.org/?p=6831. Accessed May 7, 2015.Google Scholar
Öniş, Ziya. “The New Wave of Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey: Drifting away from Europeanization?” DIIS Report 2009:05 (Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, January 2009).Google Scholar
Öniş, Ziya and Rubin, Barry, eds. The Turkish Economy in Crisis. London: Frank Cass, 2003.Google Scholar
Öz, Özlem and Eder, Mine. “Rendering Istanbul’s Periodic Bazaars Invisible: Reflections on Urban Transformation and Contested Space.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36, no. 2 (March 2012): 297–314.Google Scholar
Özden, Şenay. “Syrian Refugees in Turkey.” Migration Policy Centre Research Report 05 (2013).Google Scholar
Özler, Şule and Taymaz, Erol. “Does Foreign Ownership Matter for Survival and Growth? Dynamics of Competition and Foreign Direct Investment.” Economic Research Center, ERC Working Paper in Economics, No. 04/06 (Middle East Technical University, March 2004).Google Scholar
Papademetriou, Demetrios G. and Martin, Philip L., eds. The Unsettled Relationship: Labor Migration and Economic Development. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1991.Google Scholar
Piacentini, Teresa. “Missing from the Picture? Migrant and Refugee Community Organizations’ Responses to Poverty and Destitution in Glasgow.” Community Development Journal 50, no. 3 (2014): 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuveny, Rafael X. and Thompson, William R.. “Introduction: The North–South Divide and International Studies: A Symposium.” International Studies Review 9, no. 4 (Winter 2007): 556–564.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani, “The Turkish Economy after the Crisis.” Turkish Economic Association Discussion Paper 2009/9 (December 2009). http://www.tek.org.tr/dosyalar/RODRIK-TEK.paper.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2016.Google Scholar
Schuster, Liza. “Common Sense or Racism? The Treatment of Asylum-seekers in Europe.” Patterns of Prejudice 37, no. 3 (2003): 233–256.Google Scholar
Sever, Murat, Demir, Oğuzhan Ömer, and Kahya, Yavuz. Assessing the Identification Processes of Trafficked Persons in Turkey. Ankara: Turkish National Police Academy’s International Center for Terrorism and Transnational Crime (UTSAM), October 2012.Google Scholar
Şenses, Fikret. “Labour Market Response to Structural Adjustment and Institutional Pressures: The Turkish Case.” METU Studies in Development 21, no. 3 (1994): 405–448.Google Scholar
Smith, Adrian, Stenning, Alison, and Willis, Katie, eds. Social Justice and Neoliberalism: Global Perspectives. London: Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
Standing, Guy. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011.Google Scholar
Stratton, Jon. “Borderline Anxieties: What Whitening the Irish Has to Do with Keeping out Asylum Seekers.” In Whitening Race: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism. Edited by Aileen Moreton-Robinson, 222–238. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Tansel, Aysit. “Effects of Privatization on Labor in Turkey.” METU Economic Research Center Working Paper No. 2002-5 (March 2002).Google Scholar
Terzi, Özlem. The Influence of the European Union on Turkish Foreign Policy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Thérien, Jean-Philippe. “Beyond the North-South Divide: The Two Tales of World Poverty.” Third World Quarterly 20, no. 4 (August 1999): 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolay, Juliette. “Turkey’s ‘Critical Europeanization’: Evidence from Turkey’s Immigration Policies.” In Turkey, Migration and the EU: Potentials, Challenges and Opportunities. Edited by Seçil Paçacı Elitok, and Thomas Straubhaar, 39–62. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tucker, Deborah. “Precarious” Non-standard Employment: A Review of the Literature. Labour Market Policy Group, Department of Labour, 1999.Google Scholar
Tuncay, A. Can. “Brief History and Flexibilisation Efforts of Turkish Labour Law.” Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 15 (2013): 341–367.Google Scholar
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. UNHCR Statistical Yearbook 2011: Trends in Displacement, Protection and Solutions. UNHCR, 2012.Google Scholar
Vosko, Leah F. Managing the Margins: Gender, Citizenship, and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Vukašinovic, Janja. “Illegal Migration in Turkey-EU Relations: An Issue of Political Bargaining or Political Cooperation?” Journal on European Perspectives of the Western Balkans 32, no. 5 (2011): 147–166.Google Scholar
Waite, Louise. “A Place and Space for a Critical Geography of Precarity?” Geography Compass 3, no. 1 (2009): 412–433.Google Scholar
World Bank. Turkey Labor Market Study. Report No. 33254-TR. World Bank: Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region, April 14, 2006.Google Scholar