Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:09:29.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Islamism, Feminism and Post-Modernism: Women's Movements in Islamic Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Nilüfer Göle*
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi University, Department of Sociology.

Extract

We thought “isms” were dead after our disillusionment with socialist utopian thinking in practice. But in the last two decades, new “isms,” Islamism, feminism and postmodernism, each very distinct, have changed our lives as much as our conceptions of ourselves and our societies. Feminism redefined woman's identity and, by the same token, changed the relations between man and woman; Islamism brought Muslim actors to modern politics, in which the veiling of women blurs habitual distinctions between public and private, traditional and modern; and post-modernism-by pursuing the critique initiated by new social movements for egalitarian, progressive, emancipatory values of enlightened modernity-challenged the central and hierarchical place occupied by the West as standard-bearer of modernity. Despite their differences, each movement—feminism as a social movement, Islamism as an anti-systemic movement, and postmodernism as a movement of ideas—changed definitions and perceptions of woman, Islam and modernity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arat, Yeşim. 1989. The Patriarchal Paradox (Women Politicians in Turkey). London and Toronto: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
Arat, Yeşim. 1994. “Women's Movement of the 1980s in Turkey: Radical Outcome of Liberal Kemalism?,” in Göçek, and Balaghi, (eds.), Reconstructing Gender in the Middle East: Tradition, Identity and Power. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Asad, Talai. 1993. Genealogies of Religion. London: The John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. La Noblesse d'Etat. Grands Ecoles et Esprit de Corps. Paris: Les editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L. and Arato, Andrew. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1978. The History of Manners: The Civilizing Process, vol. 1. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Göçek, Müge Fatma and Balaghi, Shiva (eds.). 1994. Reconstructing Gender in the Middle East: Tradition, Identity and Power. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Göle, Nilüfer. 1996. The Forbidden Modern. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham-Brown, Sarah. 1988. Images of Women: The Portrayal of Women in Photography of the Middle East, 1860-1950. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Yakup Kadri. 1934. Ankara.Google Scholar
Najmabadi, Afsaneh. 1991. “Hazards of Modernity and Morality: Women, State and Ideology in Contemporary Iran,” in Women, Islam and the State, Kandioti, D. (ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Mary P. 1993. “Gender and Public Access: Women's Politics in Nineteenth-Century America,” in Calhoun, Craig (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sirman, Nükhet, 1989. “Feminism in Turkey: A Short History,” in New Perspectives on Turkey, 3.Google Scholar
Tekeli, Şirin. 1986. “Emergence of the New Feminist Movement in Turkey,” in Dahlerup, Drude (ed.), The New Women's Movement: Feminism and Political Power in the USA. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain. 1981. The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movement. (Translated from the French, La voix et le regard. Ed. Seuil, Paris, 1978). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. 1994. Orientalism, Post-Modernism and Globalism. London and New York: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zürcher, Erik J. 1993. Turkey: A Modern History. London and New York: I.B. Taurus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Helen. 1994. “Women and the Veil: Personal Responses to Global Process,” in Ahmed, A. and Donnan, H. (eds.), Islam, Globalization and Postmodernity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar