No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2024
Particular thinkers and their work seem to create significant intellectual waves at particular times and thus determine and define subsequent inquiry. We all know of the powerful consequences of Kant’s reading of Hume, but even more startling is the effect that Hegel had on the seventeen year old Ernst Bloch: ‘I read the Phenomenology of Spirit erotically—as I wrote at the time “the spiritual nightingale is singing within” in this park, this wilderness—and that is how I understood the Phenomenology as I have never understood it since’. One could respond to Bloch’s experience of the Phenomenology with the suggestion that he would have been better off reading Freud, but there is no doubting the excitement of an intellectual encounter that transforms our way of seeing the world. While Jean-Luc Marion’s book, God Without Being, cannot be placed in the same league as Hegel’s Phenomenology, it has nevertheless, in recent years, attracted much attention in English-speaking theological circles and for good reason. God Without Being, the first of Marion’s books to be translated into English, is a beautifully written book that blends a postmodern concern to overcome the impasse of ontotheology with a sensibility for things premodern—especially negative theology and the mystical tradition. This intellectual fusion of metaphysical and post-metaphysical themes is evident in one question which summarises Marion’s study: ‘Does God give himself to be known according to the horizon of Being or according to a more radical horizon?’ (xxiv) Thus the quest for a God without Being; a journey which Marion undertakes in order to expose that more radical horizon which is characterised by God’s ‘most theological name—charity’.
1 Gespräche mit Ernst Btoch. Hrsg. R. Traub u. H. Wieser. Frankfurt a. M. 1975. Quoted in Rosen, Michael, ‘The Spirit of Hegel Radical Philosophy, 22 (1979), 42–44.Google Scholar
2 Jean‐Luc, Marion, God Without Being trans. Thomas, A. Carlson (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991)Google Scholar. All subsequent references to God Without Being will be made parenthetically in the text.
3 Derrida, J., ‘How to Avoid Speaking: Denials Languages of the Unsayable: The Play of Negativity in Literature and Literary Theory (eds.) Budick, S. & Iser, W. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989), 64, n. 3.Google Scholar
4 By the ‘early’ Heidegger I am following Theodore Kisiel's periodization of Heidegger's career. Kisiel places the early Heidegger between 1919 and 1929. See, Kisiel, T., The Genesis of Heidegger's Being and Time (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), xiii.Google Scholar
5 Ward, G, ‘Introducing Jean‐Luc Marion New BUickfriars Vol. 76 No. 895 (1995), 319. My emphasis.Google Scholar
6 Nietzsche, F., The Gay Science trans. Kaufmann, W. (New York: Vintage Books, 1974), esp. 125.Google Scholar
7 John, D. Caputo, ‘How to Avoid Speaking of God: The Violence of Natural Theology Prospects for Natural Theology (ed.) Eugene, Long (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1992), 132.Google Scholar
8 Cf. Ibid. 128.
9 Martin, Heidegger, Geamtausgabe II. Abteilung: Vorlesungen 1919–1944. Band 60, Phenomenologie Des Religiösen Lebens (Frankfurt, A.M.: Klostermann, 1995).Google Scholar
10 van Buren, J., The Young Heidegger: Rumor of the Hidden King (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994), 157.Google Scholar
11 Ibid., 160.
12 Ibid., 157.
13 Ibid., 163.
14 Ibid., 189.
15 John, D. Caputo, ‘How to Avoid Speaking of God: The Violence of Natural Theology’, 140. Cf. Heidegger, M., The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic trans. Heim, M. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984), 173.Google Scholar
16 Kierkegaard, S., Training in Christianity trans. Lowrie, W. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972), 83.Google Scholar
17 Derrida, J., The Truth in Painting trans. Bennington, G. & MacCleod, I. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987), 326–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Quoted in John D. Caputo, ‘How to Avoid Speaking of God: The Violence of Natural Theology’, 130, n. 5.
18 John, D. Caputo, ‘How to Avoid Speaking of God: The Violence of Natural Theology’, 130.Google Scholar
19 Ibid., 135.
20 Ibid., 136.
21 Ibid.
22 Ibid., 145.
23 John, D. Caputo, Against Ethics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993), 222.Google Scholar
24 John, D. Caputo, ‘How to Avoid Speaking of God: The Violence of Natural Theology’, 147.Google Scholar
25 Ibid., 144. Cf. J‐L. Marion, God Without Being, 139–144.
26 Girard, R., Things Hidden Since the Foundation of the World in collaboration with J‐M Oughourlian and G. Lefort (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987), 274–275.Google Scholar
27 Andrew, Mckenna, ‘Biblical Structuralism: Testing the Victimary Hypothesis Helios 17:1 (1990), 79.Google Scholar
28 Ibid., 80.
29 Ibid., 82.
30 Ibid., 84.
31 McKenna, A., ‘Postmodernism: Its Future Perfect Postmodernism and Continental Philosophy (eds.) Silverman, H.J. & Welton, D. (Albany: SUNY Press, 1988), 238.Google Scholar
You have
Access