No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Twenty‐five Years On: A Catholic Commemoration of Karl Barth
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2024
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Karl Barth was bom in Basle in 1886, the descendant of a long line of Swiss Protestant pastors and burghers, who included in their ranks Jacob Burckhardt, the historian of the Italian Renaissance. His family were patricians and devotees of music and the arts, but they also had a simple devotion to Jesus. In the biography of Barth written, on the basis of his autobiographical essays and letters, by his last academic assistant, Eberhard Busch, we hear that Barth’s earliest theological formation came from religious nursery-rhymes in the Basle dialect. His subsequent theological pilgrimage can be seen as a flight from, and then return to, the religious assurance of these children’s songs - albeit in an infinitely more sophisticated manner. As he himself wrote, these songs
were the textbook from which I received my first theological instruction in a form which was appropriate for my immature years. What made an indelible impression on me was the homely self-assurance with which these unpretentious verses spoke of the events of Christmas, Palm Sunday, Good Friday, Easter, Ascension, Pentecost, as though they could have taken place that very morning in Basle or nearby, like any other exciting event. History? Doctrine? Dogma? Myth? No. It was all things actually taking place. You could see everything for yourself, listen to it, and take it to heart by hearing one of these songs sung in the language you were hearing elsewhere and beginning to speak. Holding your mother's hand, you went to the stable in Bethlehem, along the streets of Jerusalem into which the Saviour was making his entry. hailed by children of your own age. You climbed the grim hill of Golgotha and walked in Joseph’s garden at daybreak … Was it all rather naive? Indeed, it was very naive, but perhaps the deepest wisdom, with its fullest force, lies in naivety, and this kind of wisdom, once gained, can cany a man over whole oceans of historicism and anti-historicism, mysticism and rationalism, orthodoxy, liberalism, and existentialism. He certainly will not be spared trial and temptation, but in the end he will be brought back relatively unscathed to firm ground.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1993 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 Busch, E., Karl Barth. His Life from Letters and Autobiographical Texts (London 1976), pp. 8–9Google Scholar. Cited as ‘Busch’.
2 Ibid., p. 34.
3 In Schweizer Theologische Zeitschrift (1912), pp. 70–72.
4 Cited Busch, p. 68.
5 Cited ibid, p. 81.
6 Cited ibid., p. 99.
7 Hoskyns, E. C. (tr.), Karl Barth. The Epistle to the Romans (London 1933)Google Scholar.
8 The Humanity of God (Et. London 1956), p. 42Google Scholar.
9 Cited Busch, p. 142.
10 Cited ibid., p. 138.
11 Cited ibid., p. 150.
12 Die protestantische Theologie im 19. Jahrhundert. Ihre Vorgeschichte und ihre Geschichte (Zollikon 1947); Et Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century. Its Background and History (London 1972).
13 Cited Busch, p. 169.
14 A remark made in an autobiographical fragment, the 1964 Selbstdarstellung, preserved in the Barth Archives in Basle.
15 Die kirchliche Dogmatik (1932‐1967); Et. Church Dogmatics (Edinburgh 1936–1981)Google Scholar.
16 Dei Verbum, 10.
17 Fides quaerens intelleclum. Anselms Beweis dir Existent Gottes (Munich 1931)Google Scholar; Et. Anselm. Fides Quaerens Intellectum (Richmond, Virginia 1961)Google Scholar.
18 Godsey, J. D., ‘God‐Talk in Neo‐Orthodoxy’, American Ecclesiastical Review 167. 7 (1973), p.494Google Scholar.
19 From Selbstdarstellung (see n. 14 above).
20 From an unpublished (German) draft of a preface to the English edition of Dogmatik im Grundriss of 1947.
21 Ad limina apostolorum (Et. Edinburgh 1969), p. 9Google Scholar.
22 Ibid., p. 16.
23 Ibid., p. 27.
24 Ratzinger, J., Die letzte Sitzungsperiode des Konzils (Cologne 1966)Google Scholar; cf. Nichols, A. OP., The Theology of Joseph Ratzinger. An Introductory Study (Edinburgh 1988), pp. 99–103Google Scholar.
You have
Access