Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:35:20.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rahner Retrospective III Transcendence or Finitude

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Karl Rahner’s Foundations of Christian Faith, published in 1978, which is no doubt a masterpiece, nevertheless relies fundamentally on a very controversial picture of man as the being who transcends his finitude just by recognizing it — and this transcendence is something pretty substantial even if difficult to put a finger on. It enables Rahner to make the idea of God intelligible and even quite obvious and natural. The speed with which Rahner draws the reader into .his “system”, and the immense rewards in theological assurance and in spiritual stimulus if one goes with the tide, dissipate the difficulties about the initial move. The text is in any case very hard to understand in detail, or else the Anglo-Saxon reader, putting it all down to the foreign idiom, gives it the benefit of the doubt. This paper is a preliminary exploration of the basic epistemological problems in Rahner’s philosophy of man, with the tentative proposal that a quite different starting-point needs to be accepted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 Cf Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature by Richard Rorty, Oxford 1980.

2 In his review of Wittgenstein's Remarks on Colour in the October 1978 issue of Philosophy, p 566.

3 In a footnote to Vom Wesen des Grundes (1929) Heidegger writes: “The ontological interpretation of being human as being‐in‐the‐world tells neither for nor against the possible existence of God. One must first gain an adequate concept of being human by illuminating transcendence. Then, by considering being human, one can ask how the relationship Of being human to God is ontologieally constituted.

4 Cf Must We Mean What We Say? by Stanley Cavell, New York 1969 the references are to p 84 and p 239.

5 Cf The Claim of Reason, Oxford 1979, p 493.

6 Cavell again, Claim, p 430: “The crucified human body is our best picture of the unacknowledged human soul.

7 Cf Christ: The Christian Experience in the Modern World by Edward Schillebeeckx, London 1980, pp 731 to 743.