Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-cpvbf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-23T20:10:18.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Paradox of God's Hiddenness and Accessibility in St Ephrem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Catholic Theological Association 2003 Conference Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Dominican Council/Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 I first explored this theme in ‘The Theory of Symbolism in St Ephrem's Theology’, Parole de l’Orient 6/7(Kaslik, Lebanon: 1975–6), 1–20. The best treatment of the theme is by Brock, S.P., The Luminous Eye: The Spiritual World Vision of Saint Ephrem the Syrian(Kalamazoo, Michigan: Cistercian PublicationsGoogle Scholar, 1992; ISBN [pbk] 0 87907 604 0), esp. chs. 1 and 2.

2 Taken up to good effect by Vatican II in Dei Verbum, 13.

3 R. Murray, ‘The Theory of Symbolism in St Ephrem's Theology’, p. 3.

4 In R. Murray, ‘St Ephrem's Dialogue of Reason and Love’, Sobornost, incorporating Eastern Churches Review 2, 2 (1980), 26–40; this contains a translation of a teaching song (Hymns on the Church 9) in the genre of a dramatic contest which Ephrem imagines he overheard in his head, between the apophatic way (Reason) and the cataphatic (Love), disputing which is the right way of speaking about God. Love wins, appropriately, as it is the way of poetry.