Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:36:35.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Once in Khartoum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are concatenations of events that prompt reflexion: such as a television programme on the evidence for Jesus; a hand-out in criticism thereof, composed at Cardinal Hume’s request by some biblical and theological scholars; public expressions of disbelief, some episcopal, preceding the consecration of the new Bishop of Durham; the fulmination of York Minster, if you like; and, again if you like, the remarkable scarcity of public expressions, whether of belief or disbelief, from our own hierarchy. New Blackfriars, where in past years articles have appeared expressing a variety of views upon biblical veracity, seems a suitable place for some prompted reflexions. All references are to the bibliography.

There is one reflexion I get out of the way before offering my own—I found it in the Universe for June 29 of last year. There it was said that one proper reaction of Catholics to the dissent exhibited in the Church of England is a ‘a sense of humble gratitude for the guidance we have in the Church for our Faith, as well as a deepening fidelity’ (Burridge, col. 4). Whatever else the disagreements in New Blackfriars have done, they at least forbid us to lay to our souls any such flattering unction as that nonsense. There is in the Roman Church much dissent in these matters, dissent that goes very deep and shews no sign of going away. Some years ago, two writers in this journal expressed the dissent with force and clarity, and it is from what they wrote that I begin the reflexions I have to offer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

Arnold, M. Irish Catholicism and British Liberalism’ in Mixed Essays. Smith Elder 1903, pp. 98142.Google Scholar
Burridge, W. What do Anglican Bishops believe? Universe 29 June 1984, p. 6.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. Biblical Exegesis and the resurrection’, New Blackfriars vol. 58 (1977), pp. 5672;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
German translation in Internationale katholische Zeitschrift “Communio”, Mai 1984, pp. 271283.Google Scholar
Dupré, L. Experience and Interpretation: a Philosophical Reflexion on Schillebeeckx's Jesus and Christ’, Theological Studies vol. 43 (1982), pp. 3051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, P.J. Fact and Fiat: One Theme in the Modernist Crisis’, Durham University Journal, vol. 65 (1973), pp. 151180.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, P.J. Infallibility: a Secular Assessment. Irish Theological Quarterly, vol. 41 (1974), pp. 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, P.J. Vestimenta Imperatoris’, New Blackfriars, vol. 63 (1982), pp. 160169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, F. Exegesis and Easter’, New Blackfriars, vol. 58 (1977), pp. 108121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, F. Paul's Experience: Sighting or Theophany’, New Blackfriars vol. 58 (1977), pp. 304313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RESPONSE “Jesus: The Evidence”–Catholic Response. Cathnews. 1984.Google Scholar
Turner, G. He was Raised and has Appeared: Evidence and Faith’, New Blackfriars vol. 58 (1977), pp. 160166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar