No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Not the Whole Story: Another Response to John Milbank's Theology and Social Theory: Part II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This paper is an attempt to respond to John Milbank’s Theology and Social Theory from a perspective informed by hermeneutical phenomenology. In the first part, the ‘classical’ distinction of explanation and understanding was defended against Milbank’s critique by reference to Paul Ricoeur’s account of the distanciation/appropriation polarity. It was argued that Milbank’s account does not sufficiently grasp identity as a hierarchical synthesis of ‘ironic’ identities which reflect different degrees and kinds of distanciation from the paramount reality of everyday life (see Schutz 1962a, 1975). The explanation/understanding binary therefore retains a validity insofar as it draws attention to the way in which different readings variously manifest the moments of distanciation and appropriation.
With this groundwork in view, the second part of the paper sets out to examine Milbank’s understanding of the role of Christian theology vis-á-vis other accounts of being and the adequacy of the category of narration.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2001 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
Ayres, L., 1995, ‘Representation, theology and faith’ in Rethinking Metaphysics, eds
Jones, L. G. &
Fowl, S. E., pp. 23–46. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Daniels, J., 1997, ‘Religion, religious studies and the life‐world’, Scottish Journal of Religious Studies
18: 35–50.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W., 1979, Dilthey: Selected Writings, trans. & ed.
Rickman, H. P.. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G., 1989, Truth and Method, trans. Weinsheimer, J. & Marshall, D. G.. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1962, Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, J. &
Robinson, E.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1966, ‘Conversation on a country path about thinking’ in Discourse on Thinking, trans. Anderson, J. M. &
Freund, E. H., pp. 58–90. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1993, ‘Letter on humanism’ in Basic Writings, ed.
Krell, D. Farrell, pp. 217–65. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1993, ‘On the essence of truth’ in Basic Writings, ed.
Krell, D. Farrell, pp. 115–38. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kepnes, S. D., 1986, ‘Bridging the gap between understanding and explanation approaches to the study of religion’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
25: 504–12.10.2307/1385914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lash, N., 1992, ‘Not exactly politics or power’, Modern Theology
8: 354–64.10.1111/j.1468-0025.1992.tb00287.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeuw, G. van der, 1986, Religion in Essence and Manifestation, trans. Turner, J. E.. Princeton: University Press.10.1515/9781400858026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, G., 1992, ‘Christianity at the end of the story or the return of the master narrative’, Modern Theology
8: 365–84.10.1111/j.1468-0025.1992.tb00288.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, G., 1999, Telling God's Story: Bible, Church and Narrative Theology Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Lyon, D., 1992, ‘Against secular reason: Milbank on Augustine and postmodernism’, Crux
28: 42–5.Google Scholar
Milbank, J., 1990, Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milbank, J., 1997, The Word Made Strange: Theology, Language, Culture Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1971, ‘The model of the text: meaningful action considered as text’, Social Research
38: 529–563.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1978, ‘The hermeneutical function of distanciation’ in Exegesis, eds
Antoine, G. et al, pp. 297–319. Pittsburgh: Pickwick Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1981, ‘Phenomenology and hermeneutics’ in Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, trans. Thomson, J. B., pp. 101–28. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1984, Time and Narrative, Vol. I, trans. McLaughlin, K. & Pcllaucr, D.. London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1988, Time and Narrative, Vol. III, trans. Blamey, K. &
Pellauer, D.. London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1992, Oneself as Another, trans. Blamey, K.. London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. H., 1993, ‘Transcendental sociology? A critique of John Milbank's Theology and Social Theory’, Scottish Journal of Theology
46: 523–35.10.1017/S0036930600045282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A., 1962, ‘On multiple realities’ in Collected Papers I: the Problem of Social Reality, pp. 207–59. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A., 1962, ‘Symbol reality and society’ in Collected Papers I: the Problem of Social Reality, pp. 287–356. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A., 1975, ‘Some structures of the life‐world’ in Collected Papers III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy, pp. 116–32. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-1700-8_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, R. A., 1990, ‘Misconceptions of the social sciences’, Zygon
25: 263–78.10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00792.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access