Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:51:08.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Neglected Virtue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Richard Finn OP
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the contemporary recovery of virtue ethics some virtues have fared better than others. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy has entries for justice, wisdom, courage, self-control and the good of friendship integral to the life of virtue as understood by Aristotle and Aquinas. Yet between Hume’s fork and Humour there is no mention of humility. Why so? Aquinas wrote that “after the theological virtues, after the intellectual virtues which regard the reason itself, and after justice, especially legal justice, humility stands before all others.”

The reasons for this eclipse of humility are several. One is the absence of humility from the Classical Greek and Roman account of virtue or excellence. Not only is it missing from that account, but for many in the Ancient world to be humble or lowly was to suffer evil. Humilitas meant first a lowly and despicable origin. It was to be born a nobody. In the Tusculan Disputations Cicero’s privileged interlocutor M, discussing that chestnut of ancient philosophy, whether happiness is a matter of virtue alone, or virtue in conjunction with good fortune, lists those evils, or apparent evils, which can afflict us and lie largely beyond our control, beyond the self-definition of character: “poverty, obscurity, insignificance, loneliness, loss of property, severe physical pain, ruined health, infirmity, blindness, fall of one’s country, exile and, to crown all, slavery.” The word ‘insignificance’ here translates the Latin humilitas.’ To some this humility was incompatible with virtue. If excellence is a matter of character, of who one is and not merely what one does, and if who one is in a patriarchal world is to be the son of this father, to claim these ancestors, to be a nobody is already to fail in excellence, to be base.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 77 , Issue 906 , July 1996 , pp. 348 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 Edited by Ted Honderich, OUP, 1995.

2 Summa Theologiae, 2a2ae, 161, 5. Quotations from the Summa are in the translation by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province, 1920.

3 Tusculan Disputations 5,10,29. The translation is from the Loeb edition by J.E. King, p.455.

4 Vide, Klaus Wengst, Humility: solidarity of the humiliated, Fortress Press, 1988, esp. pp.45‐52Google Scholar.

5 Dictionary of Ethics, Theology and Society, edited by Clarke, P.B. and Linzey, A., Routledge, 1996Google Scholar.

6 Vide, Christian Ethics, A Historical Introduction, by Wogaman, J.P., SPCK, 1994Google Scholar.

7 Maclntyre, Alasdair, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Duckworth, 1988, esp. pp. 1‐12Google Scholar.

8 S.T.2a2ae, 161.1‐2.

9 Casey, John, Pagan Virtue, An Essay in Ethics, Oxford, 1990, p.200Google Scholar.

10 S.T.2a2ae, 161.1.ad.3.

11 The particular guardians of this legend being Edmund Hill O.P. and Gerard Meath O.P.

12 S.T.2a2a, 161.1.ad.l.

13 S.T.2a2ae,161.1.ad5.

14 ST. 2a2ae, 162.3.

15 On the date, Banterle, vide Gabriele, I Doveri, Opere Omnia di Sunt' Ambrogio, Vol. 13, Milan, 1977, pp. 16‐17Google Scholar. On the relation of the preface to the rest of the treatise, Palanque, vide Jean‐Rémy. Saint Ambroise et ľEmpire Romain, Paris 1933, p. 225Google Scholar, n.151.

16 De Officiis, II, 27, 134.

17 Dan. 13:24 & 42‐43.

18 “Quid est virga nisi praeferendae potestatis insigne et ulciscendi instrumentum doloris? Ergo humilis domini –in humilitate enim iudicium eius sublatum est– humilis inquam domini praeceptum discipuli eius humilitatis officiis exsequuntur; eos enim misit ad seminandem fidem, qui non cogerent, sed docerent nee vim potestatis exsererent, sed doctrinam humilitatis adtollerent. Ev. Luc. VII, 59 Vol II, p. 134.

19 Brown, P., Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity, Wisconsin, 1992, p. 147Google Scholar.

20 Ep. 51, in the translation by Sr. Mary Melchior Beyenka O.P., in Saint Ambrose: Letters, The Fathers of the Church, Vol. XXVI., Letter 3, p.23.

21 P. Brown, op. cit., p.lll.

22 De Obitu Theodosii, 27‐28, in Le Orazioni Funebri, Opere Omnia di Sant' Ambrogio, Vol. 18, Milan, 1985, p.230Google Scholar,

23 Ev. Luc. Ill, 37, in Esposizione del Vangelo Secondo Luca (I), Opere Omnia di Sant' Ambrogio, Vol. II, Milan 1978, p.278.

24 Ep.2, in the translation by Sr. Mary Melchior Beyenka O.P., op. cit., Vol. XXVI., Letter 15, p.84.

25 De loseph 1,1, in the translation by Vasey, Vincent R. S.M. The Social Ideas in the Works of St. Ambrose: A study on De Nabuthe, Studia Ephemeridis ‘Augustinianum’ 17, I98, p.91Google Scholar.