Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:20:42.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Iris Murdoch's ‘Good’: A Critical Analysis of its Nature and Relevance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Heather Widdows
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From the late 1950s to the early 1990s, Iris Murdoch produced her own unique brand of moral philosophy which offers commentary and insight into the current debate concerning the nature of moral values. Over the years, Murdoch criticised existentialism, behaviourism, linguistic analysis and utilitarianism on the grounds that they present distorted, and at best partial, depictions of the moral life. At the root of her criticisms is the conviction that these views are out of step with experience and are too narrow to account for the reality of moral value as it manifests itself in ordinary life. Today, as the debate regarding the nature of moral values—between the realists and non-cognitivists— becomes more polarised around what have come to be defining issues, such as whether there are moral facts (moral facts being assumed to be analogous to scientific facts), her criticisms and her opposing schema continue to have validity, and offer an alternative approach to moral values and the moral life. Moreover, her philosophy contains elements which could enliven the current debate in both theology and philosophy regarding the nature of moral value.

Type
Article
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 82 , Issue 960 , February 2001 , pp. 56 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

Anselm, St.. St. Anselm's Ontological Argument” in The Ontological Argument, Ed. Plantinga, Alvin, London: Macmillan Press, 1968, pp. 3–6.Google Scholar
Anselm, St.. St. Anselm's Reply to Gaunilo” in The Ontological Argument, Ed. Plantinga, Alvin, London: Macmillan Press, 1968, pp. 6–13.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. Review of Metaphysics us a Guide to Morals by Iris Murdoch. Times Literary Supplement, 1992, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
Burns, Elizabeth. Iris Murdach and the Nature of Good Religious Studies, 1997, Vol. 33, pp. 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cupitt, Don. The Long Legged Fly, London: SCM Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. Two Conceptions of Moral Realism Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society [Supplementary volume], 1986, Vol. 60, pp. 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. Moral Reasons, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. Can God's Existence Be Disproved?” in The Ontological Argument, Ed. Plantinga, Alvin, London: Macmillan Press, 1968, pp. 111–123.Google Scholar
Gaunilo, . In Behalf of the Fool” in The Ontological Argument, Ed. Plantinga, Alvin, London: Macmillan Press, 1968, pp. 13–27.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, Charles. The Necessarily Existent” in The Ontological Argument. Ed. Plantinga, Alvin, London: Macmillan Press, 1968, pp. 123–135.Google Scholar
Hepburn, R. W. Christianity and Paradox: Critical Studies in Twentieth Century Theology, New York: Pegasus, 1958.Google Scholar
Hepburn, R. W. Vision and Choice in Morality” in Christian Ethics and Contemporary Philosophy, Ed. Ramsey, I., London: S.C.M., 1966, pp. 181–194.Google Scholar
Jones, Gregory. Review of Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals by Iris Murdoch The Thomist, 1993, Vol. 57, pp. 687–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaalikoski, Katri. Replacing God: Reflections on Iris Murdoch's Metaphysics Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 1997, Vol. 11, pp. 143–160.Google Scholar
Kerr, Fergus. Immortal Longings: Versions of Transcending Humanity, London: SPCK, 1997.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, London: Penguin Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. The Subjectivity of Values” in Contemporary Ethics: Selected Readings, Ed. Sterba, James P., New Jersey: Prentice‐Hall, 1989.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Norman. Malcolm's Statement of Anselm's Ontological Arguments” in The Ontological Argument, Ed. Plantinga, Alvin, London: Macmillan Press, 1968, pp. 136–159.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques. Creative Intuition in Art and Poetry, New York: Meridian Books, 1974.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1978, Vol. 52, pp. 13–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. Aesthetic Value, Objectivity and the Fabric of the World” in Pleasure Preference and Value: Studies in Philosophical Aesthetics, Ed. Schaper, Eva, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. Values and Secondary Qualities” in Morality and Objectivity: A Tribute to J L Mackie, Ed. Honderich, Ted, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985, pp. 110–129.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. The Sovereignty of Good, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1970.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. The Fire and the Sun: Why Plato Banished the Artists, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Irk. Nuns and Soldiers, London: Chatto and Windus, 1980.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. Acastos: Two Platonic Dialogues, London: Penguin Books Ltd., 1987.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals, London: Chatto and Windus, 1992.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. The Sublime and the Beautiful Revisited” in Existentialists and Mystics Writings on Philosophy and Literature, London: Chatto and Windus, 1997, pp. 261–286.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Kai. Some Remarks on the Independence of Morality from Religion” in Christian Ethics and Contemporary Philosophy, Ed. Ramsey, I., London: S.C.M., 1966, pp. 140–151.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Kai. God and the Basis of Morality Journal of Religious Ethics, 1982, Vol. 10, pp. 335–350.Google Scholar
Nowell‐Smith, P. Morality: Religious and Secular” in Christian Ethics and Contemporary Philosophy, Ed Ramsey, I., London: S.C.M., 1966, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
O'Conner, Patricia J. To Love the Good The Moral Philosophy of Iris Murdoch, New York: Peter Lang Publishers: Part of American University Studies, 1996.Google Scholar
Plato, . Phaedrus” in The Dialogues of Pluto: Vol. 1, 2nd ed., Translated into English with Analysis and Introductions by Jowett, B., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1892, pp. 432–489.Google Scholar
Plato, . The Republic” in The Dialogues of Plato: Vol. 3, 2nd ed., Translated into English with Analysis and Introductions by Jowett, B., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1892, pp. 1–338.Google Scholar