Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2024
I have called this paper ‘The involvement of God’ because I want to take part in a discussion about such questions as whether God suffers with the sufferings of his creatures, in order to ask how far God is involved in his world. I shall first try to defend what I take to be the classical doctrine of God derived from Augustine and Aquinas: that it is not in the nature of God to be involved in the suffering of the world as spectator, sympathiser or victim, but that it is in God’s nature nonetheless to be involved with his creatures more intimately than any creature could be involved with any other. Secondly I shall argue that the Christology of Chalcedon does make sense of the notion that God suffers and indeed was tortured to death; indeed, in large part it just is this notion. Thirdly, and a bit more tentatively, I shall suggest that a sacramental interpretation of Chalcedonian christology yields the whole of the doctrine of the Trinity.
The subject of God’s suffering is so popular amongst theologians today that I am quite incapable of even beginning to give a survey of recent literature—this is partly because I haven’t read enough and partly because I don’t want to misrepresent authors by isolated quotation. I shall quote very little; I am concerned with certain ideas, how they hang together and how they fall apart.
1 J. Moltmann, The Trinity and the Kingdom of God (London 1981) p. 12; cf. Aquinas, Summa Theologiae la. 2. 3.
2 S.T. la. 12. 13. ad 1.
3 Jesus: An Experiment in Christology (London 1979) p. 12.
4 See my discussions: ‘God: II Freedom’ and ‘God: I11 Evil’, in New Blackfriars, Nov. 1980 and Jan. 1981.
5 J. Mackey, The Christian Experience of God as Trinity (London 1983) p. 182.
6 In Peri Hermenias I. Lect. 14. 197.
7 S.T. la. 8. 1.c
8 I have argued this more fully in ‘The Myth of God Incarnate’, New Blackfriars Aug, 1977.
9 The Community of the Beloved Disciple (London 1979).
10 The Anchor Bible, vols 29, 29A, 30.