No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
On 6 January 2002, the Boston Globe revealed that the Archdiocese of Boston (since 1980) and its archbishop Cardinal Bernard F. Law (since 1984) had repeatedly reassigned the priest John J. Geoghan from parish to parish, in spite of numerous complaints and reports and repeated psychological treatment for sexually abusing children.1 This essay invites theological reflection on the themes of sexuality and power as they pertain to the ecclesiastical crisis that this story represents and on resurrection preaching at a time of ecclesiastical implausibility.
Sexuality, Power, and a Crisis of Plausibility
As clear as we must be that paedophilia and ephebophilia are about power (“power over”) at least as much as they are about sex, we must also be clear that the crisis of plausibility on the part of the Catholic bishops in the United States, as they presently are perceived by both civil society and the believing church, is also about power. For some twenty years, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has surrendered its internal authority to the controlling authority of the Roman Curia over a wide spectrum of issues ranging from liturgical practice, to the role of women and laity in Church governance and ministerial practice, to a Catholic understanding of sexual anthropology and theology. What twenty years ago could be characterized as a collegial relationship of priests and people with bishops might often be described today as an adversarial relationship.
1. See the Boston Globe archives at http://www. boston.com/globe/spotlight/abuse, the book by the Boston Globe Investigative Staff, Betrayal: The Crisis in the Catholic Church (New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2002), and documentation from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops at http://www.nccbuscc.org/comm/restoretrust.htm.
2. Charles Curran, “Catholic Ethics in Tension: Sexuality and Social Justice,” keynote address at the Tenth Anniversary Conference of Chicago Call to Action, 7 November 1987.
3. Dennis D. Cali, “The Posture of Presumption in John Paul II’s Veritatis Splendor,” 52, in The Journal of Communication and Religion 21: 1 (March 1998): 47-66.
4. See John, Mahoney, The Making of Moral Theology: A Study of the Roman Catholic Tradition (London: Clarendon Press, 1987), 266Google Scholar.
5. André, Guindon, Sexual Creators: An Ethical Proposal for Concerned Christians (London: University Press of America, 1986), 4–5Google Scholar.
6. Guindon, 7.
7. Guindon, 23.
8. Guindon, 26–27.
9. Guindon, 67–68, 72, 74, 78.
10. James, Alison, “Theology amid the Stones and Dust,” in Faith beyond Resentment: Fragments Catholic and Gay (New York: Crossroad, 2001): 27–55Google Scholar.
11. See James, G. Williams, ed., The Girard Reader (New York: Crossroad, 1996)Google Scholar, or Gil, Bailie, Violence Unveiled: Humanity at the Crossroads (New York: Crossroad, 1995)Google Scholar.
12. Bailie, 44.
13. Alison, 44.
14. Alison, 46–47.
15. Richard, R. Gaillardetz, Transforming Our Days: Spirituality, Community and Liturgy in a Technological Culture (New York Crossroad, 2000), 92Google Scholar.
16. See Miroslav, Volf, Exclusion and Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation (Nashville: Abingdon, 1996)Google Scholar.
17. Mark Searle, “Serving the Lord with Justice,” unpublished lecture at Dominican Chapel/Marywood, Grand Rapids, MI (19 April 1986).
You have
Access