Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:51:36.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eucharist and Hope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While the Eucharist has a focus on both the past (re-presenting the passion of Jesus) and the present (feeding and nurturing us with the Body and Blood of Christ), it also is a celebration of hope and renewal. This hope provides a vision for the future, challenges the status quo, and prevents the church from falling into despair when faced with a culture that no longer lives sacramentally.

Even though hope is one of the three theological virtues, it has taken a beating in recent years. In today's secularized culture hope is synonymous with mere optimism or even wishful thinking. For a large segment of Christianity, hope means little more than heaven when you die. Even our language betrays us. A sentence such as, “I hope it may come true,” structured in the subjunctive mood and filled with uncertainty, casts a pall of doubt.

The Christian concept of hope, however, is much richer. It implies expectation, even confidence, and is centered on the promises of God. In fact, the focus of hope is not only on its content but on the act of hoping as characteristic of the community of faith. Therefore, hope is closely connected with patience, because it speaks of future promises which are already authentically experienced now, even though partially and in a preliminary form.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Footnotes

1

This article is a revision of a speech delivered in May, 1996 at a symposium on Eastern Orthodox theology held in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A. I wish to acknowledge my debt to the writings of Jiirgen Moltmann and others in the “theology of hope” school. I still remember the wonderful sense of discovery I felt more than twenty years ago when I first read Moltmann's Theology of Hope. I remain convinced today that the concept of hope offers the best category for avoiding the extremes of both historical optimism and historical pessimism.

References

2 Jürgen, Moltmann, The Church in the Power of the Spirit, trans. Margaret, Kohl. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1977, p. 243.Google Scholar

3 Bloch, E., cited by Jürgen Moltmann, Theology of Hope, trans. James, W. Leitch. New York: Harper & Row, 1967, p. 16.Google Scholar

4 John, Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, IH.2.42.Google Scholar

5 Ibid.

6 Moltmann, , Theology of Hope, p. 21.Google Scholar

7 The phrase “sins against hope” comes from the 1994 Catechism of the Catholic Church, section 2091.